- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NO COLLUSION and NO OBSTRUCTION!
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:46 pm to bmy
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:46 pm to bmy
quote:
Mueller says there is substantial evidence of the intent.
The element requires corrupt intent. Mueller knows that. Yet he declined to use that term. It is a very important distinction...especially when it comes to using the McGahn testimony. That is the one instance that comes closest to obstruction, IMO. However, if you rely on the testimony for the basis of the allegation, you must also accept the testimony for the intent. And The testimony shows it was clearly not corrupt intent. Mueller knows this. Congress knows this. The hope is that the public doesn’t know this.
quote:
AG says there is not
Since Mueller declined to prosecute, the sole discretion and jurisdiction lies with the AG.
quote:
It's really not that crazy and it should be painfully obvious that it's political.. because every single one of them is a politician
Agreed. Which is why what you support is a political investigation. And That’s fine.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:49 pm
0
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:46 pm to TOSOV
Having a special prosecutor means that's all he did. The matter was completely focused on.
Bitching about the findings of a special prosecutor is moronic.
I'd love to see a special prosecutor appointed for Benghazi.
Bitching about the findings of a special prosecutor is moronic.
I'd love to see a special prosecutor appointed for Benghazi.
This post was edited on 5/21/19 at 8:47 pm
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:49 pm to TGFN57
Did Benghazi have a Special Prosecutor made up of 13 angry Republicans?
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:53 pm to Tiguar
But muh toofless Trey Gowdy!!!!
Posted on 5/21/19 at 8:57 pm to Ollieoxenfree99
Gowdy is a charlatan.
Posted on 5/21/19 at 10:16 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
56m56 minutes ago
John Brennan on the Mueller probe, “I don’t know if I received bad information, but I THINK I SUSPECTED THAT THERE WAS MORE THAN THERE ACTUALLY WAS.” Wow, he admits he was wrong! Congress should go back to work on drug prices etc.
This is Brennan's story now? WOW!!! He is admitting that nothing is there.
Is he trying to get a lighter sentence? You spied on presidential campaign, and now say, oops! I was wrong. It does not work that way. It better NOT work that way.
LOCK EVERYONE OF THEM UP!!!
Posted on 5/22/19 at 4:56 am to VoxDawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/22 at 6:41 am
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:17 am to jivy26
quote:
Someone having an opposing view to yours is bad?
Having opposing views is totally fine. Part of what makes the world go round.
The problem comes in when that opposing view is almost entirely crafted by the talking points of a core of eminently uninformed (or worse, deliberately MISINFORMED) luminaries with Verified status.
Again, when the #Resist crowd doesn't know what the outrage du jour is until some blue check tells them, that's a problem.
This week it's cauliflower. The week before that it was dog walking.
It's exhausting and an indictment in our society.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:29 am to TGFN57
quote:
And how many times did Congress investigate Benghazi?
Once??
oh - and Benghazi actually happened - and it didn't have to happen - and the OBAMA administration lied their asses off about WHY it happened.
If EVER there was a reason for an OVERSIGHT committee of Congress to investigate WHY this absurd ATROCITY of governmental FAILURE happened, this was IT.
you must be a 'tard
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:32 am to jivy26
quote:
You a twitter bot?
Always the go to.
I got accused of being a Bot on a mobile game because of my name (Trump2020) and because “no one in real life openly supports that racist”
Posted on 5/22/19 at 5:46 am to bmy
quote:
and a sitting president cannot be indicted.
Where in Mueller's report did he say that is why he didn't decide to indict on obstruction???
AG Barr specifically ASKED Mueller "did this have ANY influence on your decision to not indict on Obstruction?' = and Mueller said NO. The conclusion was there was NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE to substantiate an incitement for obstruction under ANY circumstance - the PRIMARY fact being there was NO CORRUPT INTENT.
If you disagree with that you are a moron.
quote:
Mueller says there is substantial evidence of the intent
Whee exactly is that word found found in the report? I have not read it - but I do not recall anyone quoting from the report itself that Mueller described it as "substantial"
I recall that he said there were 'avenues' that he investigated that "could be considered" as obstruction - but he found NO EVIDENCE that any ACTIONs were taken by Trump.
SUBSTANTIAL is a word used by Shiff and Nadler and the rest of the DEMOCRAT retards.
I may be wrong - please correct me if I am because you seem to have pored thru the report more than I have. I am only interested in the FINAL CONCLUSION.
But I do hate to be wrong - please correct me - and I will give you praise - and promise to read more of your posts for the next 3 months.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 6:10 am to ApexTiger
quote:
Trump keeps bumping those numbers up
he is beginning to factor in the salaries of Congress since they have done nothing else since the mid-terms.
Posted on 5/22/19 at 11:44 am to VoxDawg
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/22 at 1:37 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News