- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Newsom signs the California pedophile bill
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:24 pm to Keltic Tiger
Posted on 9/12/20 at 8:24 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Speaking only for myself, I'd feel no remorse in enacting vigilante justice on behalf of any child of mine who was abused & the animal walked away with minimal time served.
I’d rather take the law into my own hands. Prison would be a walk on the beach compared to what me, my family, and friends could come up with.
Since there are doctors and nurses in my family we could keep them alive for awhile
0
Posted on 9/12/20 at 10:40 pm to AggieHank86
So you trust judges in Calif. to use discretion in applying this new law? CALIFORNIA judges? Before Trump changed the judicial landscape out there with his appointments, the Third Circuit was by far the most liberal appeals court in the country. And the lower courts were as bad if not more liberal. I trust no judge in this country anymore, especially when it comes to criminals. It's pretty much accepted that pedophiles are very seldom if ever "cured". You continue to support the judges, I'll continue to support the children of this country.
Posted on 9/12/20 at 10:48 pm to SEC7070
I hope they burn their whole state down.
This post was edited on 9/12/20 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 9/12/20 at 11:32 pm to Spasweezy
Newsom looks like a pervert.
Posted on 9/12/20 at 11:42 pm to clhawkins19
quote:
And that’s why god is burning their state to a crisp.
Posted on 9/12/20 at 11:46 pm to SEC7070
Judgement is coming.
Posted on 9/13/20 at 12:07 am to Chrome
quote:for what?
Judgement is coming.
Posted on 9/13/20 at 12:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Valid arguments certainly exist as to the length of the 10-year difference. It certainly seems long, as compared to the Romeo/Juliet statutes in most states.
Thanks. Yeah I agree that feels long for both
Posted on 9/13/20 at 1:42 am to TexasRiddler
quote:
This bill just gives judges the same discretion in both same-sex and opposite-sex cases. It is that simple.
quote:
This is wrong. Sexual orientation was not a factor in the old law. Can you site were the old law specified the orientation (in the mind) of the perpetrator?
Since you seem to have trouble grasping things no matter how many times a subject is explained to you, I'll try this.
The old law referred to vaginal sexual intercourse.
The new law adds oral and anal sex to be treated the same as vaginal sex.
The law affected only pertains to sex offender registration.
Posted on 9/13/20 at 3:24 am to texridder
quote:
oral and anal sex to be treated the same as vaginal sex.
Only one of these is actually sex.
Posted on 9/13/20 at 3:42 am to TrueTiger
LINK
The bill reduces penalties for having sex with children 14-17 and does not require they be registered as sexual offenders.
Technically a pedophile is somebody attracted to children age 10-12.
The last thing we need is more sex between adults and teenagers and more teenage pregnancy.
The bill reduces penalties for having sex with children 14-17 and does not require they be registered as sexual offenders.
Technically a pedophile is somebody attracted to children age 10-12.
The last thing we need is more sex between adults and teenagers and more teenage pregnancy.
This post was edited on 9/13/20 at 3:43 am
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News