Started By
Message

re: New phenomenon caused by climate change

Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:39 am to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:39 am to
quote:

Yes or no.
Yer or no, what? Go ahead, quantify it.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 1:40 am
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:42 am to
quote:

Yer or no, what? Go ahead, quantify it.



You have had over 24 hours to ponder, research, and come up with a yes or no answer to this simple question.

So lets go TA. Yes or No?





Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:54 am to
quote:

You have had over 24 hours to ponder, research, and come up with a yes or no answer to this simple question.
You haven't asked anything.

quote:

Yes or No?
Until you quantify something, anything, no one could possibly give you an rational answer. It's a bit like asking: "Do you believe Darrius Guice is a better?"

By the way, where is your heat balance for the "extra" Harvey rain?
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 1:56 am to
Don't play dumber then you already are TA, its a bad look.

quote:

do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?


Very simple yes or no question that you have crawfished, danced around, and now played dumb answering for over 24 hours now.

Yes or no.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:13 am to
quote:

Don't play dumber then you already are TA, its a bad look.
I love how you keep trying to make this about me.

quote:

do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?
Consensus is not a substitute for evidence. This is like asking if I believe in god because of the ironclad consensus of priests believe god exists. It's silly.

quote:

Very simple yes or no question that you have crawfished, danced around, and now played dumb answering for over 24 hours now.
Asking you to provide some sort of scientific assessment to what you want me to agree/disagree to isn't playing dumb. It's how science works. Actually, it's you avoiding quantifying any terms. I'm beginning to think you wouldn't even know what type of units one would use to describe an AGW effect.
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 2:15 am
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:30 am to
do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?

Yes or No?



Do I need to give you 48 hours to figure this simple question out? If you have questions about what the greenhouse effect is, you are on the internet. The entire body of human knowledge is basically at your fingertips... Though if you are that clueless about what I am asking you, you might want to think long and hard about why you jump into conversations you are this ignorant on the basic underlying facts anchoring it

This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 2:35 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:34 am to
quote:

do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?
Already answered. Re-read my previous post.

quote:

If you have questions about what the greenhouse effect is, you are on the internet. The entire body of human knowledge is basically at your fingertips... Though if you are that clueless about what I am asking you, you might want to think long and hard about why you jump into conversations you are this ignorant on the basic underlying facts anchoring the issue.
Still trying to make it about me. I'm flattered.
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:35 am to
quote:

Already answered. Re-read my previous post.



Once again:


do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?

Yes or No?


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:40 am to
Sqwaaaaaaaak. Sorry I don't have any crackers for you.
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:44 am to
quote:

Sqwaaaaaaaak. Sorry I don't have any crackers for you.




You don't have any self respect either it seems...


do you or do you not accept the ironclad scientific consensus on how the greenhouse effect works?

Yes or No?



Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:49 am to
quote:

You don't have any self respect either it seems.
Posted by bonhoeffer45
Member since Jul 2016
4367 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 3:03 am to
You have the power to end the cycle TA.

A one syllable response in the affirmative or the negative ends it.

If you need some more time to try and understand the question, feel free. If you need directions to Google, just ask.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57120 posts
Posted on 9/8/17 at 7:36 am to
quote:

You have the power to end the cycle TA.
So did you. But this is my last post on it.

quote:

If you need some more time to try and understand the question,
Undrstand it perfectly. Told you it's silly. The end.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram