Started By
Message

re: Net Neutrality People Have Convinced Me

Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:00 am to
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22001 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:00 am to
quote:

$56/month
About 44.00 cheaper than what I pay now, give me that price and 1TB cap and SOLD.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22001 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

NN paves the way for Govt control of the internet. Anti NN lets unchecked capitalism and monopolies reign.

If anyone needs a summation of whats going on, this is it.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
14400 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

"Net Neutrality" was intentionally mislabeled to confuse people. It is the Swamp's way of controlling the internet so the Swamp controls what you see and what you post. The internet thrived with total freedom until 2015 when Obama's Swamp took control. Repealing NN brings us back to freedom from the Swamp. Something to be Thankful for today


Honest question: Does it cause you physical pain to be this stupid?
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27129 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:14 am to
quote:

This is the type of argument most often employed by pro-NN people.


No it isn't, you are willfully being ignorant.
Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:17 am to
Something else that gets over looked in this argument is the fact that ISPs will now have the power to kill the Cord Cutter movement.

They can sell tiered internet service, effectively making cord cutting an expensive alternative. The result is more subscribers to their cable television packages.

They can also cut access to things like torrent and streaming, using the claim that it is used to view illegal content.

Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16968 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:18 am to
I somewhat agree with your position.

NN supporters are so incessantly for it, they don't even remotely consider the drawbacks of having gov't regulated internet.

I guess it's similar with most topics that people are emotional about, but I've never seen such hate and condescension spewed over a product.

I've admitted I'm torn on the issue. I see the pros and cons of both sides, but the pro NN people are awfully unnerving. They're so quick to promote this tiered internet Boogeyman it leads me to believe we've all.been duped and the answer may ly on the other side.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28240 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:20 am to
Logic in Trumps America
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25886 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Something else that gets over looked in this argument is the fact that ISPs will now have the power to kill the Cord Cutter movement


They already have this power

quote:

They can sell tiered internet service, effectively making cord cutting an expensive alternative. The result is more subscribers to their cable television packages.


already do this with service bundles.

quote:

They can also cut access to things like torrent and streaming, using the claim that it is used to view illegal content.


They are used to view illegal content.




Posted by Ccslimm
DC
Member since Nov 2016
736 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:22 am to
Dumb asses Verizon and att put it out there they are going to censor what they deem “alt right “ hate speech once this is repealed because it’s bad for business

Corporations should not be able to censor information from anyone

Dec 14 let them know what’s up
Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:28 am to
quote:

They are used to view illegal content.


Are all torrents and streams are used to view illegal content?

No, so why should we shut it down because some are used in this way?

Sounds analogus to...

Are all Guns used to kill people?

No, so why should we ban Guns because some are used to kill people?
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25886 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

Dumb asses Verizon and att put it out there they are going to censor what they deem “alt right “ hate speech once this is repealed because it’s bad for business Corporations should not be able to censor information from anyone Dec 14 let them know what’s up


So don’t use those providers? You think the FCC has your best interest at heart?
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16968 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Dumb asses Verizon and att put it out there they are going to censor what they deem “alt right “ hate speech once this is repealed because it’s bad for business 


You need to provide a link for such a claim.

Plus Google, FB, Twitter already do this.

And why couldn't they do that already? Tell me the regulations NN has in place to keep that from happening.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25886 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Are all torrents and streams are used to view illegal content? No, so why should we shut it down because some are used in this way?


No. I didn’t say it should be shut down. It should be up to the ISP to decide. It’s their network. It’s their business to succeed or fail. If most want to use it in one way and they block it they will fail.

quote:


Are all Guns used to kill people?

No, so why should we ban Guns because some are used to kill people?


It’s not analogous at all. ISPs aren’t govt entities, atleast not yet..but that’s where net neutrality will take us..
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
39904 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Kafka


What you discribed is exactly what people wanted in cable for ages.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25140 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:38 am to
quote:

support for NN by entities like Google

As much as I normally hate Google’s politics, theh have good reason to be pro-NN. Most tech companies should be in favor of it.

If internet service providers decide to charge extra for access to Google or Gmail, the ISP isnt going to be sharing a cut of that extra fee with Google and Google will end up with fewer users because a lot of people wont pay extra for it.

If people had to pay an extra $5 a month on their internet bill to access certain social media websites, those sites would lose a ton of users because a lot of people wouldnt pay for it. So of course Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat would be in favor of NN
Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:39 am to
I think it’s ironic that the people that seem to believe in a George Soros Liberal Elite Mainstream Media Cabal support repeal of NN.

I mean if the MSM is controlled by this group which in turn owns the ISPs and content, what do you think happens to “alternative media sources”?

Posted by IllegalPete
Front Range
Member since Oct 2017
7182 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:39 am to
Did you get this from a chain email from your mee maw?

quote:

$19.99/month* basic service package including routers, modems, infrastructure, technical support, connection services, and basic news/email websites. Basic service package includes download speeds up to 30 mbps with a data cap of 1000 gigs. Click here for more details on our premium packages.

Already happens

$5.99/month for your most popular social media sites like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

Good, these sites rot people's brains and are the downfall of society

$5.99/month for your favorite aggregation sites like Reddit.

bullshite. Reddit uses next to zero bandwith. Have you ever seen their UI?

$5.99/month for "fast streaming pathways!" services to access the most popular streaming services like Netflix, HBO Go, etc.

This will happen with our without NN/Repeal

$5.99/month for commerce services and websites like Amazon, Ebay, and Craigslist.

bullshite. Any site you spend money on will continue to be free. Amazon isn't stupid.

$5.99/month for miscellaneous** news services like Infowars, Breitbart, and Rush Limbaugh.

Good. As long as they do the same for Salon, HuffPo, Vox, etc. And most likely ad revenue from the company would be used to offset this and they would continue to be free, these sites don't want to lose eyeballs.

$5.99/month for miscellaneous message board services like TigerDroppings.

Worth it. I'd pay $20/mo for TD. Is there a paypal I can send it to now?

Sign up now for a two year contract*** on all services to get a $19.99/month discount**** on our new and improved "Speedster Pathways."

Already happens.

$56/month for EVERYTHING!

Already happens.

*$19.99/month basic package price is for 6 months as part of sign up promotional. $29.99/month for remainder of two year contract.

Already happens.

**ISP Provider retains the right to throttle, cancel, or block any sites identified as promoting hate speech, racist views, or other views detrimental to the reputation of ISP Provider.

Already happens.

***Cancelation of contract prior to the end of the two year agreement will require a $20/month fee for each remaining months of contract. Contract automatically renews 2 months prior to end of two year contract for an additional two years.

Already happens.

****Speedster Pathways discount only available for first 6 months of contract. Total cost of package after promotional materials expire is $86.

Already happens.

(credit to StringedInstruments)



I am officially convinced that the people losing their minds over NN are absolute idiots. They are easily brainwashed by whatever Reddit and Facebook tell them they should think. These people deserve to pay more for internet or have limited access. Their brains are already rotten.

Posted by Remote Controlled
Member since Apr 2013
6859 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:44 am to
quote:

ISPs aren’t govt entities, atleast not yet..but that’s where net neutrality will take us..


What makes you think that the government would want to get into the ISP business?

Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
25886 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:45 am to
quote:

What makes you think that the government would want to get into the ISP business?


Net neutrality...aka the govt telling ISPs how to structure their business model.

Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16968 posts
Posted on 11/23/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

think it’s ironic that the people that seem to believe in a George Soros Liberal Elite Mainstream Media Cabal support repeal of NN. 

I mean if the MSM is controlled by this group which in turn owns the ISPs and content, what do you think happens to “alternative media sources”? 


Well to be fair those same people also typically don't trust gov't regulation.

That's actually the bigger conflict of interest IMO. Your typical free market champions are now kicking and screaming for gov't regs.

This whole issue is perplexing to me.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram