- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy officer applies to become the first ever woman to join the elite SEALs
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:19 pm to TigerBait1971
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:19 pm to TigerBait1971
quote:
You really suck at succinctly communicating your position with clarity.
Probably true.
0
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:20 pm to Argonaut
quote:Yes.
Come on. You repeatedly stated that I was "finally coming around," did you not?
Because your arguments seemed to vacillate away from my synopsis above.
Hell, why are you arguing anyway if you acknowledge that in the real world, no woman should ever be selected to attend one of these prestigious schools?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:20 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
The best woman boxer in the world would lose to the top 100,000 men available who had no boxing training. Just basic stud athlete types. And, I'm probably being kind there.
There are hundreds of YouTube videos of men, many who were trained fighters getting their arse beat by women who are boxers, MMA, UFC types. While I agree with your basic viewpoint you will make a better argument by not puling stuff out of thin air.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:21 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
she is a female octopussy with many tentacles of complete contrarian bullshite. I wonder if Cuckeye will join her?
Don't lump in Buckeye with her. He's a better poster by orders of magnitude.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:21 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Hell, why are you arguing anyway if
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:22 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:I honestly think it's applicable to both.
Eh, I honestly think this whole issue is more detrimental to the conventional forces than it is the SOF forces anyway. Let them be SEALs if they want to, just don't let them in the infantry.
It's the same problem.
Every woman in any of these organizations is taking the slot of a more physically gifted male who has MUCH more upside to boot.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:24 pm to EA6B
quote:There are billions of men.
There are hundreds of YouTube videos of men,
I said 100K of them would beat the shite out of the best female boxer in the world.
And, they would. I'm probably being kind about it.
That some morons who got in the ring with some girls fell into the other 3.5 million of men is not exactly informative.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
Hell, why are you arguing anyway if you acknowledge that in the real world, no woman should ever be selected to attend one of these prestigious schools?
I didn't acknowledge that. You found a bit of common ground by asking for clarification on my position here. If they outperform men, they should be open for selection.
You say that will never happen. Maybe you're right, and this will all go down as a bad idea. Maybe you're wrong, and we'll see a female SEAL in a few years and this won't be the apocalypse you all say it will be.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:24 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I'm fine with that. Women's sports are generally boring to watch and are only kept afloat by revenue from men's sports.
And why are women's sports "boring to watch"? You aren't suggesting that they're inferior athletes, are you?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:24 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
I honestly think it's applicable to both. It's the same problem. Every woman in any of these organizations is taking the slot of a more physically gifted male who has MUCH more upside to boot.
and regardless of SOF or conventional someone is going to frick her
it happens in the rear with the gear
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:26 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:For some reason, this sounds like a description of the actual sex act.
it happens in the rear with the gear
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:28 pm to Argonaut
quote:But they don't and they never will. The best non-select males are STILL better than the best females.
I didn't acknowledge that. You found a bit of common ground by asking for clarification on my position here. If they outperform men, they should be open for selection.
quote:Well, short of drug induced equality, yeah, I'm right.
You say that will never happen. Maybe you're right
quote:This wouldn't actually prove me wrong. There may well be females who CAN pass the course. They STILL will have been selected to attend the course over men who outperformed them.
Maybe you're wrong, and we'll see a female SEAL in a few years
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:30 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
And why are women's sports "boring to watch"?
The same reason golf is boring to watch. I'm not interested in it.
quote:
You aren't suggesting that they're inferior athletes, are you?
Have I suggested otherwise?
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:31 pm to Argonaut
quote:
I didn't need to. Someone else already posted it.
No. Nobody posted portion you claimed was omitted. You are lying again. When you have to lie this often in an attempt to make a point you don't have a very good point.
Please post the omitted results like you said you would or stop lying about it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:31 pm to Janky
I'm pretty sure that's a ballscaster alter.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:32 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
No. Nobody posted portion you claimed was omitted. You are lying again. When you have to lie this often in an attempt to make a point you don't have a very good point.
Please post the omitted results like you said you would or stop lying about it.
Someone posted the report in its entirety. It shouldn't be difficult to find it.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:33 pm to DumbCollegeKid
quote:Ya know, that's the similarity!
I'm pretty sure that's a ballscaster alter.
The whole, "well, it is" approach to argument while running in circles.
Yeah. OK.
Enough of playing with that troll for the day.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:34 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
But they don't and they never will.
Maybe. I don't really feel like going in circles on this.
quote:
They STILL will have been selected to attend the course over men who outperformed them.
Then that's on the instructors and other cadre.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:38 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Then that's on the instructors and other cadre.
The cadre and instructors don't select who attend their courses.
They are the ones who make sure people finish or not
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Posted on 7/24/17 at 1:39 pm to StraightCashHomey21
How are the attendees selected?
I asked this a while back...
I asked this a while back...
Page 33 of 38
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News