Natalie Harp

quote:

---

Trump’s Blonde Companion, 34, Steals Oval Office Spotlight

---

LINK

This article is a disgusting example of journalism by insinuation.

Instead of reporting Natalie Harp’s role in a straightforward way, it repeatedly emphasizes her age, blond hair, devotion to Trump, and proximity to him, while using loaded phrases such as “blonde companion,” “fawns over,” “smiling furiously,” and “thirst aide.”

It then highlights lurid comparisons to horror film characters and includes personal details in a way clearly designed to suggest something romantic or sexual without having the evidence or the courage to make that accusation directly.

The writer can always retreat behind the defense that no affair was explicitly alleged, but the implication is unmistakable. This is tabloid character assassination posing as political journalism.

There was a time when presidential administrations were routinely criticized for failing to hire, promote, and trust enough women in important positions.

Yet when Trump employs numerous women and places them close to the center of power, their presence is treated as suspicious, personal, or somehow nefarious.

Instead of evaluating Harp on her responsibilities, competence, or conduct, this article reduces her to her appearance, her age, and speculation about her relationship with an older male employer.

That is not only unfair to Trump; it is profoundly demeaning to the woman involved. A female aide should be able to work closely with a president without journalists turning her into a sexualized caricature simply because they dislike the administration she serves.

I’m sure the National Organization for Women will come out soon and condemn this article. Oh wait…..these women work for Trump! Never mind, these type of women aren’t worthy of being defended by NOW.