re: My biggest question about Sandy Hook

quote:

---

Here is the thing with this forum. It is no longer completely full of (though there are still more than enough) conspiracy theory douchebags

---

Somewhere along the line there has to be balance. Your recent posts that I have read indicate a bit of vitriol which makes you toss the baby out with the bathwater and there is no balance. Not everyone who questions media and government narratives belong in the category of conspiracy nut. You spend a copious amount of time doing what you request a few sentences later to not have done to you...

quote:

---

And many of you actually question if someone is a conservative if they don’t believe in things like this OP’s fantasy?

---

You wish to not be generalized into a group or be labeled a non-conservative yet you are more than willing to do that with those who may or may not be as you describe them. Many of us who question narratives absolutely don't believe everything is a conspiracy. I for one try to weigh each event on their own merits. I have found myself questioning most everything of significance now based upon the utter dishonesty of the media and government for the past several years and longer...time after time, lie and political agenda manipulation after another.

I would say one is rather foolish to not immediately question what these two groups float out for public consumption, the government and media that is, or you are just setting yourself up to be dead wrong. If you're tired, you SHOULD be tired of the lies necessitating skepticism from others that we get daily from the usual suspects. THAT is what is tired and worn out unfortunately. The public should demand better at this point.

quote:

---

"Here's a conspiracy theory that isn't supported by any facts."

"Show us your evidence."

"Herp. Derp. Don't mock us!"

---

Name one bit of your evidence that doesn't come from the government or the MSM (splitting hairs, I know)?

It's easy to explain away things. That doesn't mean that the explanation disproves them. Yeah we can all say from this photo "OK someone mixed up the photos"... but what are the odds? Then you have to multiply the odds of one by the odds of another and another... eventually it's crazy to think it was all coincidence.

That's an interesting side by side...what is the story behind it? Obviously this woman is supposed to be involved in two separate events but which ones for example? Thanks in advance!

BOOM

quote:

---

FIFY

---

Lazy and predictable.

That's "Dawn" the Sandy Hook principal who supposedly died in Dec, 2012.
Then she's "Donna" the eyewitness to the Boston Bombing 4 months later.

Monster evidence.

In the interest of truth, you're doing work here, baw.

+1000

but a very "interesting coincidence", none the less

GE capitol is an even better rabbit hole

guess who owns the vast majority of superfund sites, that don't really get cleaned up?

GE buys a company who owns their property,

then sells the building they are in back to them,

financed thru GE capitol, when they sell the actual company, they keep the building, and finance it to the next schmuck

that is why GE buys companies, they want the physical assetts with no debt, to burden that company with debt, train wreck them, ruin customer base, and fire sale whats left.

and write off the fail on taxes

how many empty GE building you know of? (plenty of them)

(went thru 5 buyouts and GE was second to Danahar for F'kg everything up

quote:

---

Lazy and predictable.

---

Projection and self-delusion on a monumental scale. Atta boy!

You asked for evidence...and you got it from VT. IN SPADES.

And now all you can do from your lounge chair is wave it all off and yawn in front of a bucket of stale Cheetos and mound of Schlitz empties?

quote:

---

When the "real" moments don't match the storyline...to me that is more telling than anything else that might be thrown out such as an opinion or theory as to what happened.

---

Nutshell.

Comes down to this:

Eyewitness Testimony-in-Real Time + Preserved Docs vs The Gaslit Narrative + Revised "history" (and lazy / ZERO Research)