re: Muslim Immigrant Objective in Europe

It definitely used to be that way, but in many respects, the recent years have dramatically changed that.

quote:

---

These globalist think they will continue to be in power but the muslims will eventually start voting themselves into office and I bet they won't be so kind and tolerant to the natives.

---

You mean if 20 or 30% or more of Congress were Keith Ellisons that wouldn't usher in paradise on earth?

Their objective in Europe is to get away from their shitehole countries and squat in a country that gives them free shite and a better quality of life...

But they don't want to assimilate...just use the system and backward thinking generosity by idiotic liberal Europeans.

Muslims want a better quality of life but they don't want to have to build it themselves...like a flea hopping on a rat, they race to Europe and infect the countries with their plague, backward ideologies, terrorism and hatred for their own hosts who are supporting them.

quote:

---

To be honest, I don't know what to think. Some of the claims/predictions whatever seem to be corroborated, but others seem like reaches and/or fantasy.

---

Same. Some of the way he words things don't hit the ear right to people with experience in the federal government/military, it just isn't the way a person involved in these things would use terms.

I'm also curious about certain things that he isn't saying or has refrained from saying. Certain people, groups, etc.

But whatever it is it has seeds of truth, is well done, and is resonating. I asked because from reading some of your stuff I can see we sort of think alike.

Losing their Country without a shot fired, well just a few

Kind of crazy how white people will just allow other races to come in and take their shite without a fight. Most are actually in support of giving it to them.

quote:

---

That works wonderfully up until the point of true global interaction and the idea of all of humanity as part of the community, at which point it is able to be taken advantage of, both from above and below

---

Exactly.

At a certain level it's almost just game theory. You live in a town and everyone agrees not to lock their front door because nobody will steal. You agree to this because you're not going to steal - your conception of morals forbids this. This works out great in a town where everyone shares those morals, that is, until new neighbors move in who don't think like you and you get robbed blind.

This concept can be applied to many of our relationships with other groups and you quickly see how badly we get fricked because of our naivety. See China; we agree to reducing tariffs while increasing trade and outsourcing our production there while at the same time thinking they'll respect our intellectual property and retain our standards of quality...which of course they don't because they don't share those ideals. We trust too much.

quote:

---

It's really hard to tell what's actually going on in Sweden because of obfuscation by their media.

---

It's mostly a gang war between native Swedish gangs (now sort of integrated, except for one prison gang), gangs made from immigrants from the Balkans (hence why grenade attacks occur, as the supply is usually from Balkan War-era stockpiles), and new immigrant gangs. That's what drives a lot of violence.