re: Mueller Day In Game Thread

quote:

---

'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...


Isn't that kind of important?

Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question

---

No collusion

No Obstruction

A lot of butt hurt

Who was the guy on the left of Barr in the PC?
Rosenstein looked drugged.

quote:

---

'it doesn't exonerate him.' Highlighting it, saying it over and over...

---

quote:

---

Isn't that kind of important?

---

quote:

---

Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question

---

The basis of our justice system is that people have to be proven guilty there is no need to be proven innocent or "exonerated". It is binary, you either committed a criminal act or you didn't.

quote:

---

The basis of our justice system is that people have to be proven guilty

---

I did find it interesting that the definitions/ideals/requirements were changed/altered for the report so that his failure to be deposed is somehow tantamount to obstruction...

quote:

---

Isn't that kind of important? Also, it doesn't really say there is "no evidence" as to the larger question

---

I agree. I’ve read the pertinent parts of the report. Barr is full of shite and acting like a lackey hack. There was no conspiracy, but there’s no fricking way a rational person can conclude that there was “no collusion”. And on top of that, there is probable obstruction, which Mueller lays out quite succinctly. It’s more than obvious that Muller intended congress to take action on multiple fronts, including obstruction. Trump said he’s fricked. And he is. Now it just depends on how everybody handles it. If he’s impeached, then Pence would just pardon him. frick that noise. I want this fricker to rot in prison. I don’t want him impeached. I want to beat him at the ballot box and watch him perp-walked away from everything.
However, even if he is impeached and pardoned for federal crimes, the SDNY is there to take care of business later. So, I’m torn.

quote:

---

there is probable obstruction

---

quote:

---

Trump said he’s fricked

---

You forgot the rest of the statement. Ignorance or dishonesty on Your part?

quote:

---

the SDNY is there to take care of business later.

---

I bet you don’t even know what the allegations in the SDNY investigation are


Keep dreaming. It’s going to be a tough 6 years for you.

I DGAF what you think, Trumpist.

quote:

---

So stop being a fricking partisan hack

---

That's special. Yes, I read your partisan melt.

quote:

---

You’re supposed to be a lawyer. So stop being a fricking partisan hack. All you want to do is mince words and dissect semantics.

---

If by semantics you mean applying specific acts to elements of a crime, yes. That is the discussion I want. It is quite telling you neither provided any specifics, nor are willing to discuss them.

quote:

---

You’re just as compromised as Barr is

---

Are you saying Barr is basically Trump’s wingman?


Oh and I noticed you didn’t rebut my allegation that you are ignorant as to what the SDNY is investigating. Yet you assert they will gain a conviction. Perhaps you aren’t the right person to be calling anyone partisan. Hack.

quote:

---

Rebut, or go the frick away.

---

Your lack of self awareness is staggering

quote:

---

Such as is your lack of observance and objectivity. I find your opinions lack regard and are unworthy of response given your allegiance. Good day, sir.

---

Still waiting on a single specific so we can engage in an objective discussion. You either aren’t capable or are unwilling. Your projection is pathetically obvious.