re: MORNING JOE: "In a 2nd term, Trump will imprison, he will execute whoever he is allowed to

quote:

---

I like how for his entire term in service and then now, all they want to do is harass him with the legal system. But if he’s in charge, he’s not supposed to do shite to them.

---

Again, SOP.

How many people remember that the Democratic Party filed a lawsuit alleging that the election had been stolen in 2016? Hillary Clinton went on every talk show in the country claiming that Trump was an illegitimate president who stole the election and nobody said beans.

Then Trump questions the 2020 election and everyone who is suspicious is a "dangerous election denier."

It's what they do.

You are insane. So let me get this straight, you’re in favor of potentially murdering perceived enemies of Trump that are Americans?

Why don’t they ever talk about the girl that her husband killed?

Nice whataboutism. So you’re ok with unlawful murder of Americans to appease the ego of a narcissist. Got it.

As for J6 defendants, the stakes were much higher given the intent to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power… but you already know that.

quote:

---

intent to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power

---

So Trump will treat the Dems just like they treat J6 protestors? Sounds fair to me.

The left’s lack of self awareness is astounding.

Or maybe they are aware.

quote:

---

So you’re ok with unlawful murder of Americans to appease the ego of a narcissist. Got it.

---

NOT to appease the ego of anyone - to enforce criminal law and the massive degenerate intent to set up what you decry against innocent Americans.

Stop fighting for evil.

quote:

---

Same thing with the Comey investigation. "We found no evidence that he did anything, but that doesn't mean he's not guilty! He almost certainly is."

---

Remember what became the Left's slogan in talk shows in the early stages of the contrived fantasy:

"We haven't seen any fire yet, but there's smoke, lots of smoke."

Was surprised that they didn't get so desperate that they would accuse him of merely "thinking" about colluding with the Ruskies.

It's been a Leftist ploy going all the way back to the Authoritarian Personality study.

Which is, when something can't be proven due to a lack of evidence available, attempt to convince any and all who might actually listen and believe that there is enough "evidence" to accuse the target of having "thought" about doing it solely because of who he is and the group he represents.

quote:

---

This is revisionist history and you know it. So where is this evidence that proves J6 was a hoax or fraud or whatever delusion/conspiracy you’re currently charmed by?

---

This is a bit of a strawman. There is no revisionist history on my part. Just a setting the record straight. The evidence is all over the place that this event was not an insurrection, but a few bad actors and a whole bunch of people just walking around. What kind of insurrectionists calmly walk around a building unarmed and then leave completely on their own. They weren’t ushered out or arrested. They simply walked out and went home.

Have you not seen the video? Do you think it’s AI or something? The clips that CNN and the J6 commission play over and over again was a tiny part of what happened. The breach of the building took place before the crowd left Trump’s speech. By the time they got there the doors were wide open with no barriers or security to stop them.

If all you do is ignore the noise from the right and the left, look at all the video that’s out there of both bad behavior and benevolent behavior it’s clear this is not what was represented by the left, wether you think feds were involved or not.