Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

More good news for Hunter Biden

Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:18 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:18 pm
The Fifth Circuit ruled the federal law prohibiting possession of guns by habitual drugs users is unconstitutional in light of Bruen.

LINK

Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141889 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:20 pm to
Posted by Cajun Abundance
Member since Jan 2023
141 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:22 pm to
They can eat a bag of dicks. Wouldn't be shocked if he has also. Coke is a hell of a drug
Posted by Nosevens
Member since Apr 2019
10290 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:22 pm to
Is it that he owned it or that he lied about on the federal form in the application of ?
Posted by NoHoTiger
So many to kill, so little time
Member since Nov 2006
45736 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Is it that he owned it or that he lied about on the federal form in the application of ?

I thought it was because he lied on the form. Pretty sure it says “under penalty of perjury.” At least it did on the last one I filled out.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:25 pm
Posted by SingleMalt1973
Member since Feb 2022
11913 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:25 pm to
quote:

that he lied about on the federal form in the application


Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:26 pm to
Good question. But I actually don’t care about Hunter Biden. That was just the hook to get you to click

But in our post-Bruen world, can you point me to any Founding-era registration requirement? Doesn’t that entire scheme go out the window?
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:27 pm
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:28 pm to
I expect to see a lot of conservatives cheering on this win for the Second Amendment.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48298 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:29 pm to
Absolutely. Why wouldn’t conservatives cheer this?
Posted by rhar61
Member since Nov 2022
5109 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

I expect to see a lot of conservatives cheering on this win for the Second Amendment.



YOU expect consistency from anybody else?

Why? You do not follow it yourself.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:32 pm to
I found it interesting the underlying law was passed in 1968 at the height of the counterculture movement/ law and order response.

That actually played a part in the analysis. There were few historical analogues from before then to justify it.

I actually don’t mind this one being struck down, especially in light of our evolving views of marijuana.

I’m more curious to where the line is on this historical analogue world we now live in.

Higginson’s concurrence touches on that and that Rahimi has been granted cert and hopefully we get a little further clarification from it about where the guideposts are.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:56 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:34 pm to
What is the basis for gun registration? Why do we need gun registration?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

Why wouldn’t conservatives cheer this?


If they have brainworms.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48298 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

If they have brainworms.


You keep using this phrase. Is it all the rage at the home?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80227 posts
Posted on 8/9/23 at 9:37 pm to
Generally to keep guns out of the hands of invalids, children and the insane, but if you can’t give me a historical analogue to the same then we’re shite out of luck.
This post was edited on 8/9/23 at 9:37 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram