- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mike Lindell - Absolute Proof
Posted on 2/5/21 at 4:51 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
Posted on 2/5/21 at 4:51 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Dominion has been very clear the lawsuits against Sidney and Rudy were not the last ones.
So what? What, exactly, was lied about? They will need to PROVE that. It's not enough to merely prove that demonstrable facts about their systems are unpopular, and therefore caused them damages. They need to be demonstrably false.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:00 pm to BiteMe2020
If dominion is innocent I expect them to sue the hell out of Lindell and prove their innocence. Haven’t seen them do that yet because they know he has the goods.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:17 pm to GhostOfFreedom
shite is about to go down.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:23 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:
If dominion is innocent I expect them to sue the hell out of Lindell and prove their innocence. Haven’t seen them do that yet because they know he has the goods.
Or it could be they are taking the time to build their case. It took seventeen days after Dominion sued Sidney before they sued Rudy.
I think Lin Wood will next, then who knows.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:24 pm to Langland
It’s gone from his webpage now so I’m guessing it will be scrubbed completely before to long
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:24 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Or it could be they are taking the time to build their case. It took seventeen days after Dominion sued Sidney before they sued Rudy.
I think Lin Wood will next, then who knows.
So fricking what?
All that is is intimidation horseshite.
Maybe they can get a current judge like that piece of shite Sullivan, that is what they are angling for.
How come you never talk about what biden is doing?
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:26 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:
It’s gone from his webpage now so I’m guessing it will be scrubbed completely before to long
I can’t watch it anywhere
Can anyone give a summary? Is this a nothingburger?
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:29 pm to beebefootballfan
Posted on 2/5/21 at 5:32 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I can’t watch it anywhere
Can anyone give a summary? Is this a nothingburger?
It's worth watching the whole thing, but the Absolute Proof part starts at the 1:36:00 mark.
https://michaeljlindell.com/
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:06 pm to beebefootballfan
quote:No it's not.
It’s gone from his webpage
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:07 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
I can’t watch it anywhere
It's on his personal website, Rumble and Gab.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:13 pm to cwill
quote:
So he just rehashes all the bullshite from the kraken (crackyn?) cases?
Why would Maricopa county not cooperate with Auditors?
From my experience, people who don't want external auditors around are hiding something.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:15 pm to Langland
Ehh that link sucks, on my phone at least. Trying to fast forward and just goes back to the beginning.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:19 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
In a public letter, 59 top specialists called the president’s fraud assertions “unsubstantiated” and “technically incoherent.”
I'm not going to get into the nuts-and-bolts of this thread and the R vs. D aspects of arguing legitimate points...
I'm just going to point out that it's a proven fact that you can't trust these kind of statements from anyone, ANY source. There's piles and piles of literature and articles out there about the "paid-for opinion" proliferation in journalism and reporting, so much so that it's actually become a systemic problem - especially in the environmental movement.
Basically, even the most professional and wealthy "experts" can be paid to express opinions that they're pushed to express by those with the money. Everything and everyONE is for sale, for the right price.
There have been many polls, expert opinions, reports, studies, and scientific papers that were proven to be considered "fact" by the masses but mostly influenced by what the highest bidder wanted it to say.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:31 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Fifty-nine of the country’s top computer scientists and election security experts rebuked President Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud and hacking on Monday, writing that such assertions are “unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.”
They spouted this nonsense shortly after the election.
None of these 'experts' have done anything close to being a forensic investigation.
This post was edited on 2/5/21 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:34 pm to RazorBroncs
Giuliani in Public: ‘It’s a Fraud.’ Giuliani in Court: ‘This Is Not a Fraud Case.’
Keep an eye on what President Trump’s lawyers say about supposed voter fraud while they’re in an actual courtroom.
NY Times
Keep an eye on what President Trump’s lawyers say about supposed voter fraud while they’re in an actual courtroom.
quote:
Keep an eye on what President Trump’s lawyers say about supposed voter fraud while they’re in an actual courtroom.
NY Times
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:44 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
quote:
Keep an eye on what President Trump’s lawyers say about supposed voter fraud while they’re in an actual courtroom.
NY Times
Quoting the fricking NY times. Dude get the frick out of here with that shite. You have become pathetic with your constant drivel.
Hell Mickey Goodwill has more substance than the shite you put out and that is saying something.
Posted on 2/5/21 at 6:56 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Ehh that link sucks, on my phone at least. Trying to fast forward and just goes back to the beginning.
This is on rumble. Go to the 1:36:00 mark.
https://rumble.com/vdlbl7-absolute-proof-mike-lindell-election-documentary-full.html
Posted on 2/5/21 at 7:57 pm to Porky
quote:
None of these 'experts' have done anything close being to a forensic investigation.
Any one of them have better credentials than the “cyber experts” presented by Trumps legal team. There are many firms that do forensic data analysis, and provide expert testimony in fraud cases for major corporations, and even challenges in elections. I wonder why Trump’s team did not hire one of these legitimate firms instead of the clowns they tried to pass off as experts?
Posted on 2/5/21 at 8:03 pm to EA6B
Where is the detailed and expert analysis of these superior experts demonstrating the security and foolproof nature of the election infrastructure and that explains the reason all 6 swing states stopped counting at the same time and the various other statistical anomalies? I’d love to see a report.
Popular
Back to top


1








