Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Michelle Bachmann: Live from Geneva for the W.H.O. Assembly Universal HealthCare Treaty

Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:52 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:52 pm
Former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann joins Steve Bannon’s War Room live from Geneva for the World Health Assembly at the United Nations. Bachmann reports that parties are agreeing that both the pandemic treaty and the 300 amendments that have been put forward for international health rules are going to be presented in documents in 2024 and then voted on in a years time. These provisions which are being integrated into rules are centered around pandemic lockdowns and medical tyranny. The rules push a globalist economic standard with one world health care.

Scroll Down Video Clip

They spoke seriously of doing a simulation of the medical tyranny pandemic this fall. They will soften it up in the USA and maybe call it an accord versus a treaty.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 9:04 pm
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26540 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:03 pm to
UN healthcare coming soon if we let it.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:04 pm to
Disclaimer: It doesn't matter who the messenger is. It is real, they have plans for global tyranny, medical tyranny, control in pandemics, and they aren't shy about it.

But save the, 'Michelle Bachman is a ditz' garbage.

She called out the muslim brotherhood in DC and got smeared like she is a crazy ditz so they could run her out of town-like they fired Tucker. She is an astute attorney.

I would bet the WHO has full videos they are no longer hiding it.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8690 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:06 pm to
We need to distance ourselves from the rest of the world as quickly as possible by any means necessary
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:43 pm to
DC will try to camo it and call it an Accord. So Congress is unaccountable as always with a treaty voted on and ratified as it should be.

Look at DC's healthcare compared to non DC critters. It is the best of the best. So they will tell us we will all be equal. When it is unsustainable.

They can't even handle over run E.R.'s with illegals right now. It is global marxism via healthcare. And you will eat bugs and like it.

The only way they can accomplish this is making America weak and not exceptional.
This post was edited on 5/22/23 at 7:46 pm
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21027 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:33 pm to
Heard Michele Bachmann on a panel discussion recently. Nothing ditzy at all.
Posted by Captain Poopie Pants
Pag Island
Member since Jun 2020
487 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:39 pm to
Michelle Bachman is no ditz. She’s a brilliant lady. I think she’s an economic/math expert of some sort.

She’s criticized because she comes across as a cheeseball. Our society has grown to be pretty shallow unfortunately.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 8:48 pm to
Most of Europe and definitely Canada will be onboard with this garbage. Canada is fully onboard with whatever the WEF and China tell them to do. Canada needs regime change, badly.

UN / WHO / WEF - all in on this and leading the charge.

Other parts of the world are hit or miss, but most of them will be steamrolled if it comes down to it.

China will gladly embrace this for others while doing what they want inside their borders because they know this will weaken other nations.

It's interesting how China is always left out of the globalist stuff. WEF will impose things on Dutch farmers, they won't dare touch anything in China. Gosh, I wonder why.

Russia has not embraced this globalism stuff that I've seen.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 9:07 pm to
We should be petitioning DC critters to stop this and not sneak it in something at 2AM that is 8764 pages long.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 3:08 am to
FactCheck.Orgs appear on net searches and say that no nation will lose sovereignty. Biden already committed to it in some powers he signed, nothing to see here move the frick along.

quote:

LINK

FIRST ON FOX – Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., announced Monday he will be chairing a congressional hearing on the Biden administration’s "push to enter an international pandemic treaty that could cede American sovereignty to the World Health Organization (WHO)."

Smith, who chairs a subcommittee concerned with global health and human rights organizations, first raised concerns last May when the White House offered amendments to the WHO’s international health regulations, which the congressman said would grant new unilateral authority to the director-general of the WHO to declare a public health crisis in the United States and/or other sovereign nations without any consultation with the U.S. or any other WHO member states.

Specifically, Smith said, the Biden amendment would strike the current regulation that requires the WHO to "consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring in," an action he says would be ceding the United States’ ability to declare and respond to an infectious disease outbreak within the U.S. and be dependent on the judgment of the United Nations.

Smith said top officials from the Biden administration will be invited to testify, but it's not yet clear who those officials will be.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 5:03 am to
quote:

We should be petitioning DC critters to stop this and not sneak it in something at 2AM that is 8764 pages long.


Couple days ago I released another campaign video in my series on Evil and Government. Here are some things that more people need to become aware of:

Federalist Paper No78, in discussing the hierarchy of authority and power in our country.
If there should be an irreconcilable
variance between the [Constitution and a
statute], that which has the superior
obligation and validity ought, of course, to
be preferred; or, in other words, the
Constitution ought to be preferred to the
statute, the intention of the people to the
intention of their agents
.


Just because Congress passes something does not make it legitimate. We need the courts to begin taking notice of this as well. The 4100 page Omnibus for example, has no weight in actuality. We're going to have to start challenging these things.

Federalist Paper No49, affirming the power and authority of the People:
As the people are the only legitimate
fountain of power, and it is from them that
the constitutional charter, under which the
several branches of government hold their
power is derived…


Finally, from Chief Justice Marshall:
The government of the Union, then . . . is,
emphatically and truly, a government of
the people. In form, and in substance, it
emanates from them. Its powers are
granted by them, and are to be directly
exercised on them, and for their benefit.


Anything less is illegitimate.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 5:04 am to
quote:

FactCheck.Orgs appear on net searches and say that no nation will lose sovereignty. Biden already committed to it in some powers he signed, nothing to see here move the frick along.


There will definitely be a loss in sovereignty and any agreement made on behalf of the US People is void.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23831 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 5:43 am to
Please, correct me if I am wrong here .... seems I recall
Trump wasn't very fond of the UN. We need our leaders to stand against all this shite. If taxpayers can't vote in it, our leaders shouldn't sign off on a damn thing connected to "World" or "Nation" anything.
We need to going a different direction, toward more self sufficiency.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63430 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 6:04 am to


This post was edited on 5/23/23 at 10:10 am
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110968 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 6:26 am to
Why would we ever possibly need anything like an “international accord” for “healthcare”? What would that possibly entail that would in any way be if any benefit to you and me?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167593 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 7:22 am to
Very much like the 5eyes used to spy for the USA. We do their dirty political, spying they do ours-- to leave a giant loophole making it okay & unpunishable.

Uncle Brandon, Uncle Newsome, or Aunt Big Mike don't have to worry about no stinkin constitution. The U.N. and WHO will order no buying or selling or leaving your home unless you get vaxed by an AI outside of CVS.
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Michelle Bachmann
Still hot after all these years.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15770 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 8:22 am to
Is she taking tardasil again? Most underperforming congress critter there was.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63430 posts
Posted on 5/23/23 at 10:08 am to
quote:

What would that possibly entail that would in any way be if any benefit to you and me?


Nothing...at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram