- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Maybe someone here can answer Clint’s question about the folks lying about Massie
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:33 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:33 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Where are the names?
He named the one he knew.
However, I have to wonder why you believe it's all on Massie to give the names, and why you don't ask the same of the other members of congress.
It makes me think you don't really give a frick about the topic other than to attack Massie.
1
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:35 pm to the808bass
quote:
He’s been purposefully antagonistic of some of Trump’s legislative attempts for personal reasons, IMO.
wrong
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:40 pm to EphesianArmor
It really is Massie's fault. He assumed Trump was telling the truth when he said he'd release the Epstein files when DT was campaigning.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:40 pm to EphesianArmor
dgnx6 is an evil piece of shite who pretends to be a Christian
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:41 pm to 3down10
quote:Sorry.
He named the one he knew.
The backbench motormouth has access to everything ... unredacted.
Where are the names!
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:44 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Massie voted NO on moving the SAVE act forward because it wasn't a perfect bill. This is always his MO. He will only vote yes if it is a perfect bill or the bill includes provisions for redactions which he can then complain about.
Massie voted no on moving it forward because dishonest riders to help steal our tax dollars were hidden in it.
You fricking idiot.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:45 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:Massie has access to every file, every document, every picture all unredacted.
He assumed Trump was telling the truth when he said he'd release the Epstein files
He said he'd name, names. He cannot say he doesn't have the names. He has access to everything. Who is he covering for?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Sorry.
The backbench motormouth has access to everything ... unredacted.
Where are the names!
Why don't you call your congressman and ask for them? They all had the same access as Massie.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:47 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Massie has access to every file, every document, every picture all unredacted.
He said he'd name, names. He cannot say he doesn't have the names. He has access to everything. Who is he covering for?
Everyone in congress has access to them.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:47 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:That's what Massie said after he caught absolute Hell for letting TDS drive his vote. He also says he'd name names.
Massie voted no on moving it forward because dishonest riders to help steal our tax dollars were hidden in it.
Well .... ? We're Waiting.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:48 pm to 3down10
quote:Correct.
Everyone in congress has access to them.
But not everyone in Congress said they'd name names.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:49 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
That's what Massie said after he caught absolute Hell for letting TDS drive his vote. He also says he'd name names.
Why does it bother you so bad that Massie is trying to get the DOJ to do their stinking job?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:51 pm to 3down10
quote:
The public knowing a foreign nation kidnapped American children to be raped by powerful people as part of a massive effort to control our politics and foreign policy and that these types of things are common place is a pretty big step in the right direction.
+2
Fully explains the all-out effort from the tippy-top of goobermint power to circle wagons around those perpetrating the most satanic acts of mankind. (now that the files are seen by a nauseous Congress, how many will be immediately threatened to shut their mouths?)
Serious question: Should we now expect a FF event soon?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:51 pm to 3down10
quote:He's busy with other things. This is Massie's project.
Why don't you call your congressman and ask for them?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:51 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
Massie voted against the rule to move the SAVE Act forward. It's great he finally voted yes on something his constituents want, but all this does it highlight the problem with Massie that his followers can't comprehend.
Massie voted NO on moving the SAVE act forward because it wasn't a perfect bill. This is always his MO. He will only vote yes if it is a perfect bill or the bill includes provisions for redactions which he can then complain about.
You're not defending Massie well. It's just another example where Massie has to go against every other Republican just so he can tell us how awesome he is. And some people just gobble it up. They can't see through the show.
And that's all Massie is, a performer. He might have been genuine at one point, but now he goes against the grain just to stand out and needle Trump. Massie has no power because he is unable to persuade or build coalitions, with Republicans I mean, so this little show is all he can do. He is much more aggressive towards his own party than he is the party of abortion, open borders, and DEI.
Be sure to donate, though. The show must go on.
There is no "perfect bill" because they hide things inside bills behind things like this bill that contains the Save Act so they can pretend anyone who votes against it was voting against the named issue, and that anyone who voted in favor did so for that reason.
It's why they refuse to have single issue bills.
And people like you who not only excuse it, but also go and attack anyone who didn't participate in the fraud are the reason why it's allowed to continue.
You know what happens if it failed? They would just have to redo it without the provision.
Or have you always been a big supporter of the Nancy Pelosi speaker days where they were given bills and made to vote on them in less than 24 hours?
Do you think that's a good trade? And why is it that with a republican majority such a rule needs to be slide in to start with?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:53 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He's busy with other things. This is Massie's project.
Make Orwell Fiction Again under your name must be ironic.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:54 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Correct.
But not everyone in Congress said they'd name names.
So you're happy with the people doing less because they never said they would do more to begin with?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:54 pm to LittleJerrySeinfield
quote:It wouldn't, if that was what the POS actually was about. It isn't. The DOJ has released everything to Congress. Massie has the names. Where are they?
Why does it bother you so bad that Massie is trying to get the DOJ to do their stinking job?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:56 pm to 3down10
quote:No.
So you're happy with the people doing less
I'm happy with folks working different projects with different focus (e.g., election security) simultaneously.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 2:58 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He has access to everything. Who is he covering for?
Who are YOU covering for?
In your opinion ARE the 'Epstein' Files a "hoax"?
Was a "hoax" sitting on Pam's desk months ago?
How can 3 million files and graphic emails described as "unspeakable crimes" be considered a "hoax"?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News