Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Looks Like the CF Whistleblowers Will Testify at 1:00 PM CST.......

Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:48 am
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:48 am
....or shortly thereafter on CSPAN 3.

CSPAN 3? Are they trying to minimize the audience for this?

Here's some general info (not a link for the hearing):


CF Hearing
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
131281 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:52 am to
Don’t get too excited.

I hope I’m wrong. But I doubt this amounts to anything.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146570 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:53 am to
Great find. No one thought this was going to be LIVE. Thanks for the link. I think it is Tom from Judicial Watch and others. I don't think Huber or any whistle blowers will be there. Unless the names listed on the committee web page are whistle blowers?

Isn't it unusual for whistle blowers to go public?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94877 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:53 am to
Did she hire Antonio Montana to take them out in front of the capitol?
Posted by Gnar Cat21
Piña Coladaburg
Member since Sep 2009
16836 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 9:55 am to
quote:

CSPAN 3? Are they trying to minimize the audience for this?



It’s probably that. Or, you know, because nothing of significance will come from it
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146570 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:01 am to
There had better be something significant from Huber's investigations or this country is in a world of hell not trusting the DOJ/FBI..
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11804 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:04 am to
Letdown Part 52 for the Poli Board.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64208 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:04 am to
If charges were to be filed would they really be doing this?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:12 am to
quote:


Isn't it unusual for whistle blowers to go public?


It's unusual for Clinton whistleblowers to live long enough to go public.

My understanding is that Huber will not be there (was he a decoy?), but that a couple of whistleblowers will be. I'm hoping that the former Clinton Foundation CFO (Kessel?) will be there.

I'm a huge Tom Fitton & Judicial Watch fan, but I want more from today than just him. The MSM can easily spin both him & JW as Trump partisans.


Meanwhile, Queen Hillary & Lurch are dancing the night away in Mumbai.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:14 am to
quote:

If charges were to be filed would they really be doing this?


John Dean was a whistleblower, and he testified. Didn't stop them from getting Nixon.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73284 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:17 am to
The great nothingburger continues

Was this a tick tock from that fool Hannity?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:20 am to
quote:

CSPAN 3? Are they trying to minimize the audience for this?




It’s probably that. Or, you know, because nothing of significance will come from it


And please tell me, how would they know AHEAD OF TIME that nothing of consequence was going to come out of this?
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:22 am to
quote:

There had better be something significant from Huber's investigations or this country is in a world of hell not trusting the DOJ/FBI..


Agreed. There will be only so many opportunities.....
Posted by Gnar Cat21
Piña Coladaburg
Member since Sep 2009
16836 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:23 am to
quote:

And please tell me, how would they know AHEAD OF TIME that nothing of consequence was going to come out of this?


Because same as it ever was
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146570 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:33 am to
Sadly, It looks like the subcommittee is not whistle blowers; but a overall general discussion of facts of foundations that are political losing their tax exempt status...



LINK
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 10:49 am to
quote:

If charges were to be filed would they really be doing this?



if they have finished with investigators and Grand Jury, it's fire a will.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29906 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 11:14 am to
quote:

There had better be something significant from Huber's investigations


he is as deep state as they come, this is a full blown coverup operation, not an investigation.

he had to be embarrassed into interviewing the main frickin witnesses because he wasnt even interested in asking them any questions so thats the kind of investigation he is running

he is jeff sessions 2.0
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I'm a huge Tom Fitton & Judicial Watch fan, but I want more from today than just him. The MSM can easily spin both him & JW as Trump partisans.
Yeah, no doubt, because it would have to be spin if Fitton and JW were cast as partisans, yes?
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2127 posts
Posted on 12/13/18 at 12:25 pm to
Interesting note...panel one speaker Philip Hackney is an LSU law grad. Class of 2001.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram