- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LOL, Candace goes there…moon landing.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:26 pm to Gimme back that fish
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:26 pm to Gimme back that fish
quote:
IPIIHB
I hate online acronyms that force me to do a web search. Not a true acronym, but my irritation stands.
0
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:27 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Its amazing that for over 4 billion dollars Artemis II will fly around the moon, take some pictures and come back with just the Orion capsule left to show for it.
What the hell are you talking about.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:28 pm to SirWinston
quote:
The only reason I believe we went to the moon is because Elon says we did.
I don't need Elon to tell me we went to the moon to know that we went to the moon. The "moon landing was faked" are as loony as the "earth is flat" crowd.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:29 pm to Radio One
quote:
What the hell are you talking about.
The Artemis II mission 2026
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:30 pm to GumboPot
I find this Moon skepticism odd (though somewhat interesting). While I'm here, I'll exploit opportunity to recommend late 70s film Capricorn One. Good film, and Moon-doubters might especially enjoy.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:30 pm to GumboPot
I love Candace but we went to the moon.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:33 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
No it doesn't. You can give one piece of technology, that they say they used, to be able to accomplish what they said.
Yes I can. Every piece of technology they used.
What piece of technology do you take issue with?
quote:
We can't get a couple of stranded astronauts home right now
Russia and SpaceX can
quote:
and they are 10 xs closer and we have computing power thousands of times stronger than in the 60s.
Computational power is not the issue. The issue is with Boeing's DEI capsule that NASA was going to use
quote:
Yet idiots today think we had an uneventful flawless trip, AND BACK, over 50 years ago?
We didn't have DEI companies acting as contractors to NASA back then
This post was edited on 12/19/24 at 9:08 pm
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:37 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The good news is, the Artemis program will prove once and for all that we can put a man on the moon as soon as they stop pushing the schedule back.
The irony. Lol.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:37 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I’m interested in the temperature data because the moon surface can get up to 260 degrees on the sunny side and -280 degrees on the dark side. Some of these missions they spent 33 hours on the lunar surface.
There’s no atmosphere
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:38 pm to OBReb6
quote:They're all like that, especially the flat earthers. Although, that group was recently owned when a crew livestreamed 24 straight hours of sunlight in Antarctica.
but if you’ve ever listened to Bart Sibrel and you have any sense it’s pretty easy to pick up on how full of shite he is.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:41 pm to Jack Carter
quote:
Russia and SpaceX can
He said “we” can’t dude not that Russian can’t
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:43 pm to GumboPot
We went to the moon.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:45 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
I don't need Elon to tell me we went to the moon to know that we went to the moon. The "moon landing was faked" are as loony as the "earth is flat" crowd.
Same level of silliness, one just has a better PR department.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:46 pm to blueboy
quote:
a crew livestreamed 24 straight hours of sunlight in Antarctica.
This would be literally impossible to fake
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:52 pm to Auburn80
quote:
I even attended the 69 moon launch. Even back then they could easily track things
This is the issue. People think that because they witnessed the launch and it gives them the feel-goods remembering it, and it feels like they were a part of history, they can't imagine the govt perpetuating a lie about the moon landing because they don't want that memory destroyed. Probably because life in this country was so much better then than now. Everything is shittier. College football hadnt been ruined by NIL and the portal.. Chicks didn't have dicks. Cokes were a nickel. Now... it's all shite, so you ARE NOT taking the moon landing from me, dammit!! LoL
The govt tells 2 immutable truths. Just two.
We landed on the moon, and
6 million joos died in the Holocaust.
Unbelievably these two events are also linked to the only two examples of de-evolution in modern technology. In 1969, we had the ability to go to the moon and today we don't.
In the 1940s, crematoriums were MUCH more efficient than they are today.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:54 pm to Radio One
Is there footage that is fake? A resounding yes. Did we go? Yes. Why is the evidence of a fake trip? In case we failed.
There is video of the dune buggy kicking up dust and it doesn't appear to be in earth strength gravity.
There is video of the dune buggy kicking up dust and it doesn't appear to be in earth strength gravity.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:56 pm to omegaman66
quote:
omegaman66
Is there footage that is fake? A resounding yes. Did we go? Yes. Why is the evidence of a fake trip? In case we failed.
They made an entire movie with that exact plot.
Posted on 12/19/24 at 8:58 pm to omegaman66
quote:
Is there footage that is fake? A resounding yes. Did we go? Yes. Why is the evidence of a fake trip? In case we failed. There is video of the dune buggy kicking up dust and it doesn't appear to be in earth strength gravity.
Interesting
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:01 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She’s right about the Jews!
Posted on 12/19/24 at 9:06 pm to 4LSU2
quote:
The movie says it was Apollo 11
You're already disqualified from any rational discussion on this issue. You cited a "movie" instead of "NASA"
quote:
How did the lunar module and camera crew make it to the moon?
The lunar module made it to he moon via detaching from the command module.
There was no "camera crew". The fact that you think there was a "camera crew" is absurd.
quote:
How was this broadcasted live in 1969 when Americans in 2024 lose cell service during a major storm event
Non-sequitur. You are comparing near the speed of light with poor reception.
quote:
and the FBI can’t tell us to whom the cocaine belonged to found in the White House?
You just proved that we landed on the moon. The FBI can tell us but they simply wont
quote:
Everything since the JFK assassination in 63 your government has told you has been a blatant lie
We're talking about the moon landings, not "everything"
quote:
I’m almost 47 years old and still laugh at my Dad for saying he saw us land on the moon.
Why did you laugh? Your evidence to debunk it is "Muh FBI cocaine!" and "Muh cell service has only muh 2 bars!"
Do you realize that you provided no rebuttal to debunk the moon landings? Not one!
Do you realize that?
Page 3 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News