Started By
Message

re: Lois Lerner tries to bust into her neighbor's house

Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:02 am to
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:02 am to

so once again mut, you think simply proclaiming something "a lie" will negate the truth of it... and once again the only one being fooled = you.



Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Maybe she was scared? It appeared to me that she was.

She wasn't scared. She was pissed.
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:06 am to
quote:

He'd have kept following her and she just wants to walk her dog in peace.


she deserves to be in jail for the rest of her life, not walking her dog in peace.

watching a state-fascist get what they actually deserve for a change, and the bitter tears of the little dnc trollbots here,, such sweet sweet irony.


This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 10:09 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Take a bottle of xanax and wipe the spittle off your lips.



Take a bottle of mouthwash and wipe Obama's cum from your lips.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

she deserves to be in jail for the rest of her life, not walking her dog in peace.

That was sort of my point. I feel no sympathy for her.
Posted by Lobo Apple Sauce
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:33 am to
Mister, and some of you other guys, are treading on very thin ice.

There's such a thing as being a party to a violation in the USAM Tile 9 CRM 1628. It reads:
. . .all employees of all branches, departments, and "agencies" of the United States Government, are covered under §1114. Family members are protected by §115 (a)(1). Threats to intimidate Feds covered under §115 (a)(2); and, all is expanded in Title 18, to include "former" Feds.

The last I heard, The Treasury officially designates all of their employees as National Treasures.

The upshot is, avoid wishing harm and harassment on Ms. Lerner's person; lest, you have some legal
This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 10:35 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Mister, and some of you other guys, are treading on very thin ice.



Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79620 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Mister, and some of you other guys, are treading on very thin ice. There's such a thing as being a party to a violation in the USAM Tile 9 CRM 1628. It reads: . . .all employees of all branches, departments, and "agencies" of the United States Government, are covered under §1114. Family members are protected by §115 (a)(1). Threats to intimidate Feds covered under §115 (a)(2); and, all is expanded in Title 18, to include "former" Feds. The last I heard, The Treasur officially designates all of their employees as National Treasures. The upshot is, avoid wishing harm and harassment on Ms. Lerner's person; lest, you have some legal


WTF are you even talking about?

Is this supposed to be some kind of a threat or something?
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:


WTF are you even talking about?

Is this supposed to be some kind of a threat or something?


lol, that's what I was wondering.

apparently the trollbot thinks being a state fascist overlord grants immutable rights from ever being questioned,, our rulers are beyond reproach eh?


quote:

The Treasury officially designates all of their employees as National Treasures





no doubt,,, I'm sure THEY do.
This post was edited on 10/8/14 at 10:40 am
Posted by Lobo Apple Sauce
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:40 am to
It was only an effort to educate you.
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:42 am to
quote:

It was only an effort to educate you.


YOU!


"educate"...


Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28794 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Lobo Apple Sauce
Who's alter is this shinny pants whiny bitch?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58554 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Mister, and some of you other guys, are treading on very thin ice.

There's such a thing as being a party to a violation in the USAM Tile 9 CRM 1628. It reads:
. . .all employees of all branches, departments, and "agencies" of the United States Government, are covered under §1114. Family members are protected by §115 (a)(1). Threats to intimidate Feds covered under §115 (a)(2); and, all is expanded in Title 18, to include "former" Feds.

The last I heard, The Treasury officially designates all of their employees as National Treasures.

The upshot is, avoid wishing harm and harassment on Ms. Lerner's person; lest, you have some legal


Get the frick out. She's a public figure now, and was being followed by a reporter in public.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52765 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 11:01 am to
quote:

mmcgrath


Does anyone here believe Lerner deserves any sort of sympathy?

I hope she is harassed every single day until she is brought to trial for targeting political opponents and willfully destroying would be criminal evidence.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10809 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 11:06 am to
quote:

watching a state-fascist get what they actually deserve for a change, and the bitter tears of the little dnc trollbots here,, such sweet sweet irony.

Posted by Lobo Apple Sauce
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 7:09 pm to
?????????????????????????????quote:
Mister, and some of you other guys, are treading on very thin ice. 

There's such a thing as being a party to a violation in the USAM Tile 9 CRM 1628. It reads: 
. . .all employees of all branches, departments, and "agencies" of the United States Government, are covered under §1114. Family members are protected by §115 (a)(1). Threats to intimidate Feds covered under §115 (a)(2); and, all is expanded in Title 18, to include "former" Feds. 

The last I heard, The Treasury officially designates all of their employees as National Treasures. 

The upshot is, avoid wishing harm and harassment on Ms. Lerner's person; lest, you have some legal

Get the frick out. She's a public figure now, and was being followed by a reporter in public. 
?????????????????????????????


Come on, you have to call that physical entrapment. She was trying to call the police, as any reasonable person would do, when threatened.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 7:17 pm to
You are so full of shite you are forcing reasonable people to agree with vols&shaft. Do you know how fricked up you have to be to make that happen?

Lobo Apple Sauce, you officially lose the internet today.
Posted by Lobo Apple Sauce
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 7:22 pm to
I watched the video. Did you, cave?

If anyone invaded my personal space that much, I'd feel threatened.
Posted by Me4Heisman
Landmass
Member since Aug 2004
5509 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

I watched the video. Did you, cave? If anyone invaded my personal space that much, I'd feel threatened.


Well then, I guess you are also a giant twat.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

You are so full of shite you are forcing reasonable people to agree with vols&shaft. Do you know how fricked up you have to be to make that happen?



WTF?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram