- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Liz Harris releases independent canvassing results from Arizona .... cheaters cheat!
Posted on 9/8/21 at 5:57 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 9/8/21 at 5:57 pm to mmcgrath
quote:You have something to contribute?
Keep digging Tigah.
1
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:13 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:26 pm to Asusundevil23
quote:Indeed
Start the video at the 28:30 mark:
LINK to interview with Liz
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:36 pm to Lightning
quote:
I've done just some very preliminary research and there is a home showing on Google Maps and the Maricopa tax records show the address registered to a David & Natalie Barnes. I don't know if there is some secret meaning behind this but choosing this photo as the cover shot of the report and stating it is a vacant lot, when that can be checked within seconds seems odd.
What you've witnessed may very well have been someone failing a leak test.
Here's the cover page of the report that you get when you complete the canvass survey, direct from Canvass50:
The address in question is on a version of the report dated Sept. 7.
This one is Sept 8. Different pic, different address.
Someone leaked a copy of a known flubbed cover.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Do you have a point to make, or are you into random questions?
He serves no purpose on this board other than to harangue people he perceives himself as being smarter than. A rhetorical giant among mere mortals. Ask him, he'll tell you.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:42 pm to VoxDawg
This intentional “mistake” will make the liberals give all kinds of free press to the canvass since they will latch on to the “we got them now” fervor hook line and sinker, whereas otherwise they would have ignored the story.
The patriots used this same ruse earlier this year to the same successful effect although I can’t recall the details.
The patriots used this same ruse earlier this year to the same successful effect although I can’t recall the details.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:44 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
He serves no purpose on this board other than to harangue people he perceives himself as being smarter than. A rhetorical giant among mere mortals. Ask him, he'll tell you.
Vs you and the other guys that show up to agree with each other on how much you love trump / hate democrats?
Atleast he has a unique perspective even if we don't agree on everything.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 6:45 pm to oklahogjr
That's a lot of words to say he's a contrarian fig.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 7:25 pm to VoxDawg
Don’t get mad at me because you’ve been LARPing for the better part of four years with nothing to show for it.
You just don’t have admin cover in the echo chamber anymore.
You just don’t have admin cover in the echo chamber anymore.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 7:29 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
This intentional “mistake” will make the liberals give all kinds of free press to the canvass since they will latch on to the “we got them now” fervor hook line and sinker, whereas otherwise they would have ignored the story.
The patriots used this same ruse earlier this year to the same successful effect although I can’t recall the details.
To do what? Say there are five red bikes in my neighborhood therefore there must be five million red bikes in my state?
That’s like 3rd grade multiplication- not any sort of statistical proof of anything.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 7:35 pm to boosiebadazz
This is the same approach as polling, perhaps you’ve heard of it.
The independent partial canvass should provide justification for an official full canvass. The extra publicity will make that happen.
The independent partial canvass should provide justification for an official full canvass. The extra publicity will make that happen.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 8:14 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
This is the same approach as polling, perhaps you’ve heard of it.
So polling information is accurate now? we should trust this type of extapolation carte blanche with no details on the data collected?
Some of the first things taught in statistics is how many different bias's can be in things. That's why you see most credible statisticians make their data available and let others review in detail their findings.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 8:40 pm to oklahogjr
Man hang on oklatoolbag.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 10:31 pm to Jbird
Polls / canvas extrapolations would have a margin of error. With frickery numbers as high as 176K / 96K and the races all decided by margins of only 12K to ~ 500 voted the results blow way past any reasonable margin of error.
1/3 of all responses showed missing / discarded votes!
Official full canvas more than justified by independent partial canvas results.
1/3 of all responses showed missing / discarded votes!
Official full canvas more than justified by independent partial canvas results.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 10:39 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Polls / canvas extrapolations would have a margin of error. With frickery numbers as high as 176K / 96K and the races all decided by margins of only 12K to ~ 500 voted the results blow way past any reasonable margin of error.
1/3 of all responses showed missing / discarded votes!
Official full canvas more than justified by independent partial canvas results.
Nate silver has polls and a data model from 2016 that all say hilldawg would be president. Doesn't make it true.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 10:45 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Polls / canvas extrapolations would have a margin of error. With frickery numbers as high as 176K / 96K and the races all decided by margins of only 12K to ~ 500 voted the results blow way past any reasonable margin of error.
1/3 of all responses showed missing / discarded votes!
Official full canvas more than justified by independent partial canvas results.
Polls / canvas extrapolations would have a margin of error. With frickery numbers as high as 176K / 96K and the races all decided by margins of only 12K to ~ 500 voted the results blow way past any reasonable margin of error.
1/3 of all responses showed missing / discarded votes!
Official full canvas more than justified by independent partial canvas results.
If this is going to be the standard, “independent canvassers” just need to find two people who have differing answers and extrapolate out that 50% of the larger population must also therefore be in the same position.
Posted on 9/8/21 at 10:55 pm to Jrv2damac
quote:
Funny how anyone with common sense knew they cheated when it was called way too early. 10 months ago.
For the umpteenth time, Arizona was called early because there was an error reporting the uncounted votes making it appear that there were fewer votes outstanding than there actually were.
It's unbelievable how uninformed you Trumpers are.
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:14 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
In Maricopa Co alone. i.e., >20X the Biden-Trump differential statewide.
You think we should just add those votes on top of what the Cyber Ninja posse comes up with?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:27 am to VoxDawg
I'm amazed that you haven't given up this gig.. have you ever been correct on any of these "facts" you are always talking about?
How have you survived this long in the real world?
How have you survived this long in the real world?
Posted on 9/9/21 at 12:29 am to NC_Tigah
Who is Liz Harris and how do we know she is trustworthy?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News