- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's all re-focus on the "Real" election meddling, shall we?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:23 pm to Bass Tiger
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:23 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
Focus, the OP states, Let's all re-focus on the "Real" election meddling, shall we.
No mention of Russians, unless you want to include HRC's questionable uranium deal in exchange for millions of dollars into the Clinton Crime Foundation from a Russian mining company. But frick that shite, just stick with the MSM and DNC getting debate questions ready for HRC.
I am pretty certain you brought up the Russians just now...I know I didn't....
1
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:23 pm to Bass Tiger
Wasn't it the NSA that tried to hack certain States during the election, like Georgia?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:25 pm to germandawg
Did you see where I said "frick that shite"? I knew it would distract you, back to the OP, refute any or all of it, or stick your fingers in your ears and start spouting lalalalalala!
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:26 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
And the $ 2 billion in free press was 90% negative, I don't think the MSM wanted Trump.
Which is exactly what an anti-establishment candidate needed more than a hog needs slop....
And someone had already mentioned Bernie...
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:30 pm to germandawg
quote:
Which is exactly what an anti-establishment candidate needed more than a hog needs slop....
And someone had already mentioned Bernie...
I think you're having some concentration issues, refute the OP. As of today the aforementioned OP describes the only verifiable "election meddling".
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:39 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I think you're having some concentration issues, refute the OP. As of today the aforementioned OP describes the only verifiable "election meddling".
Im agreeing with you my frinend...the MSM meddled on behalf of Trump
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:44 pm to germandawg
quote:
Im agreeing with you my frinend...the MSM meddled on behalf of Trump
In your pretzel logic world I'm going to agree with you on the MSM costing HRC the GE. The MSM miscalculated how far they could go pimping for HRC and it backfired, there were too many people who still possessed free thought that saw through the MSM BS.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:21 pm to Bass Tiger
TigerDev needs to be reminded on occasion, that the only verifiable collusion during the election, was the MSM doing all they could to get Hilldawg elected including passing debate questions to the chosen one. 
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:24 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:R-R-R-Response thread?
Tigerdev?
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:25 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:What if the establishment, understanding how angry the general public was, decided to put Trump in the general to quell the tide, and all the "negative" coverage was part of the game to sell the public on Trump being anti-establishment?
You can go into full deflection and denial mode but this is historical facts. Over 90% of the MSM coverage of Trump was negative whether warranted or not.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:27 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
What if the establishment, understanding how angry the general public was, decided to put Trump in the general to quell the tide, and all the "negative" coverage was part of the game to sell the public on Trump being anti-establishment?
That actually crossed my mind one time but I said "they aint that damn clever"!
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:28 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:They wouldn't be the establishment if they weren't that clever. They'd be you and me.
What if the establishment, understanding how angry the general public was, decided to put Trump in the general to quell the tide, and all the "negative" coverage was part of the game to sell the public on Trump being anti-establishment?
That actually crossed my mind one time but I said "they aint that damn clever"!
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:36 pm to Bass Tiger
Funny how that's never talked about.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:43 pm to Pussykat
quote:
Funny how that's never talked about.
It is! Isn't it? That's why when a dude like Tigerdeviant starts a thread about Trump and Russian collusion they have to be reminded of the "Real" election meddling.
We can't let these Prog/Dims spread their false narratives and memes.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:46 pm to Bass Tiger
Russian influence in our election isn't something that's still debatable, is it?
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:52 pm to Argonaut
quote:
Russian influence in our election isn't something that's still debatable, is it?
If you mean the wikileaks stuff sure, but HRC was colluding with the MSM/DNC right in front of the whole damn country and you goobers were ok with it.
This post was edited on 4/14/17 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 4/14/17 at 5:57 pm to Bass Tiger
I have challenged all the resident PT progs to refute the OP and the crickets have been chirping so long they went hoarse.
Posted on 4/14/17 at 6:07 pm to Bass Tiger
I didn't vote for her and I wasn't OK with it. Not sure why you're cool with Russian influence.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News