Started By
Message
locked post

Latest, greatest minority. Zoophiles!

Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:10 am
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58049 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:10 am
CNSNEWS


quote:

The recently crowned Best Picture is about a woman getting freaky with a fish-man hybrid thing. And the fantasy seems to have created a stir among a certain segment of the alt-left. Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate. But the Huffington Post’s Ashley Feinberg has no time for mere baubles of unfulfilled aquatic fantasy. She found a fish fornication expert to review “The Shape of Water." Malcolm J. Brenner sleeps with the fishes. Or, he did, back in the 1970s. And it was an aquatic mammal, not a fish. But the fact is, according to Feinberg, Brenner “fell in love with and ultimately made love to a dolphin named Dolly.” On porpoise! (Sorry.) Brenner later wrote a book about the fling, and was the subject of a documentary (trailor below). He calls himself a “zoophile,” but he’s no love ‘em and leave ‘em playboy. Feinberg tells us Brenner “draws a careful distinction between zoophiles and mere bestialists … the latter “might just have sex with an animal and walk away,” while the former “is someone who has tender or caring emotions for their animal partner.” You know where this is going, right? Feinberg notes that “‘The Shape of Water’ ... frames its interspecies romance in social-justice terms.” Yep. Brenner and other zoophiles are a repressed minority, misunderstood by hidebound traditionalist society. Brenner says he’s had bigots “threatening to go Lorena Bobbitt on me because I made love with a Feedback “I’m hoping that in a more enlightened future,” he tells Feinberg, “zoophilia will be no more regarded as controversial or harmful than interracial sex is today.” Love wins!



quote:

I would like to think that society will become less religious, because the prohibitions in Leviticus are the only conceivable basis for any laws against bestiality. I can’t see that my boffing my dog has any effect on society, good or ill, as long as I’m not hurting her or abusing her. Laws against animal cruelty ought to be sufficient without criminalizing the act of interspecies sex, which organizations like PETA are trying to do.”
This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 6:37 am
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:16 am to
Ya know. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds but that said, I am not exactly willing to go to political war for these freaks

And i damned sure am never going to frame them as being oppressed or their critics as bigots for rightly calling them freaks.

Sorry dude. You fricked a dolphin. I may not want you in jail, but you are still a fricking weirdo i want nowhere near me.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58049 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:20 am to
quote:

. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds


That's a broad definition of Liberty!
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58812 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate. Since the markets abhor a vacuum, Shape of Water-inspired dildos are earning rave reviews at places like Slate.


So good they had to say it twice?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:33 am to
quote:



That's a broad definition of Liberty


I know.

I have a very broad definition of the word. I think it's the only feasible definition

But frick these freaks if they think they're going to avoid social consequences
Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:34 am to
This whole mess started when we gave women and blacks the vote.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:34 am to
hahahahahaha

I knew it

I am telling you, in 10,15,20 years they will push for legal fricking of little kids.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
22348 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:38 am to
quote:

Ya know. I oppose bestiality laws on pure liberty grounds



Can animals give consent? It's kind of rape by definition.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58049 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:41 am to
quote:

I am telling you, in 10,15,20 years they will push for legal fricking of little kids.


I think the idea of nothing being taboo is closer to reality every day.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 6:58 am to
In western law, the prohibitions against homosexuality, incest, and bestiality all originate in the same place. You cannot toss one without undermining them all.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79199 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:00 am to
So no shame in Hollywood then???? No way!

They continue to creep out everyone but themselves
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71170 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:04 am to
They're a majority in Tuscaloosa.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:09 am to
quote:

, the prohibitions against homosexuality, incest, and bestiality all originate in the same place. You cannot toss one without undermining them all.


silliness:

Homosex - two CONSENTING people. For marriage - ADULTS

Incest - fear of genetic abnormalities (whether some or all are factual..I'll leave to science)

Bestiality - Cannot have "consent" from an animal




I'm not taking a position in this response. I am simply saying it is quite easy to "accept" homosex and "reject" the others

This post was edited on 3/27/18 at 7:10 am
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:19 am to
quote:


Incest - fear of genetic abnormalities (whether some or all are factual..I'll leave to science)

Bestiality - Cannot have "consent" from an animal


What's silly is your low information counter argument. What is your opposition to incest if the parties involved agree not to have children? As far as consent, it is very easy to say that for an animal the act constitutes consent, or that consent is only relevant when Homo sapiens is involved.

Again, the restrictions against these deviant behaviors all originate in the same place,mans you cannot overturn the authority of one without overturning them all.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:20 am to
quote:


Can animals give consent? It's kind of rape by definition


Look. I'm not defending the scum that's into this shite. But language has meaning and if you are going to use the word rape here then you have to use the word slavery for pets cattle horses Etc.

You can speak about these people with plenty of disdain without bastardizing the language
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:21 am to
quote:


I'm not taking a position in this response. I am simply saying it is quite easy to "accept" homosex and "reject" the others

Truth
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:21 am to
quote:

a certain segment of the alt-left.


bullshite! Everyone on the Left is alt-Left.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:22 am to
quote:

you are going to use the word rape here then you have to use the word slavery for pets cattle horse


PETA and their philosophical counterparts already do.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:24 am to
quote:

What is your opposition to incest if the parties involved agree not to have children?


ugh....

1) I said it was not MY position. Only, easily made

2) We do not make exceptions to general laws based upon a "promise" by others to not do a thing.


quote:

or that consent is only relevant when Homo sapiens is involved.


Exactly. No homo SAPIENS...no consent



Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58049 posts
Posted on 3/27/18 at 7:25 am to
quote:

Again, the restrictions against these deviant behaviors all originate in the same place,mans you cannot overturn the authority of one without overturning them all.


But the law already makes a distinction. Right or wrongly, it does.
Are you saying that beastiality could be challenged in court and the law changed on the basis that homosexuality is currently legal?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram