- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Late night breaking story: another person ford names comes out and denies knowledge
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:27 pm
quote:
BREAKING: One of the other two guys that Ford identified as being present at the party comes forward. He says he has "no knowledge of the party in question; nor do I have any knowledge of the allegations of improper conduct she has leveled against Brett Kavanaugh"
LINK
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:29 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Well, we have to look at each of these witnesses on their own merit
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:30 pm to ehidal1
The frick we do...vote takes place Monday when she is a no show
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:36 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Though Smyth states Ford has named him in connection with the party, she did not publicly identify him when she provided her account of what happened to the Washington Post earlier this week. Ford did not immediately respond to a request for comment through her attorneys, nor did the White House.
She’s going down. And it’s not going to be pretty.
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:42 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
CNN headline:
Former classmate of Kavanaugh's denies being at party in sexual assault allegation
There was no party. This story is going to drag on far longer than it should because it’s all a fairy tale.
Its like trying to prove King Arthur never groped a chambermaid in his teens. What’s the first step? Because Camelot didn’t really exist.
Former classmate of Kavanaugh's denies being at party in sexual assault allegation
There was no party. This story is going to drag on far longer than it should because it’s all a fairy tale.
Its like trying to prove King Arthur never groped a chambermaid in his teens. What’s the first step? Because Camelot didn’t really exist.
This post was edited on 9/18/18 at 11:51 pm
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:44 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
So now it's three against one??
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:45 pm to Volkosoby
quote:
The frick we do...vote takes place Monday when she is a no show
That was a sarcastic play on Hillary’s comment to Rocky Maddow bruh
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
She better get in her bunker now with all these fibs. Toddy’s arse gonna be raw
Posted on 9/18/18 at 11:58 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Three down, one dude to go.
Were there supposedly two other or one other chick(s) there?
Were there supposedly two other or one other chick(s) there?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:06 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Here's the thing. How does he know that he has no knowledge of the party in question when he doesn't know where the party was, or when the party occurred.
The only way his statement can be correct is if he has never been to a party, anywhere.
The only way his statement can be correct is if he has never been to a party, anywhere.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:08 am to texridder
DO YOU HEAR YOURSELF?
You cannot be this dumb!
You cannot be this dumb!
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:08 am to texridder
No. That’s not true.
He can know pretty quickly if he was ever at a party of 6 or 7 people where three of them were Judge, Kavanaugh and Blasey.
Unless you’re arguing that Blasey has her story completely wrong. That would be a novel tack.
He can know pretty quickly if he was ever at a party of 6 or 7 people where three of them were Judge, Kavanaugh and Blasey.
Unless you’re arguing that Blasey has her story completely wrong. That would be a novel tack.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:11 am to the808bass
I think he’s taking a literal on a quote someone else recorded. Hence the quotation marks in the OP. So in other words “Tex put on Robot face and reed words no context needed”
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:18 am to texridder
quote:
Here's the thing. How does he know that he has no knowledge of the party in question when he doesn't know where the party was, or when the party occurred. The only way his statement can be correct is if he has never been to a party, anywhere.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:19 am to texridder
You stupid fricking piece of shite.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:27 am to texridder
quote:
Here's the thing. How does he know that he has no knowledge of the party in question when he doesn't know where the party was, or when the party occurred.
The only way his statement can be correct is if he has never been to a party, anywhere.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:39 am to texridder
quote:
Here's the thing. How does he know that he has no knowledge of the party in question when he doesn't know where the party was, or when the party occurred. The only way his statement can be correct is if he has never been to a party, anywhere.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 12:40 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
i hope this woman got her money up front for this performance. Because hell hath no fury like a scorned Democrat party!
my god what an epic fail
my god what an epic fail
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News