- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kari Lake gets busted again
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:29 pm to John Barron
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:29 pm to John Barron
quote:
Ron Paul and Trump was the only 2 people I have ever voted for.
Ok...
They either are the only 2 people you have ever voted for or they were the only 2 people you have ever voted for.
They are not, however, was the only 2 people you have ever voted for.
Grammar matters.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 3:34 pm
0
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:30 pm to dgnx6
quote:
bidenx6
Is this what you're going to do now? Follow me around, whining because I'm critical of Trump?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:32 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
Earlier this month, the Trump administration moved to defund the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM), an independent federal agency that oversees the Voice of America (VoA), the US’s largest and oldest international broadcaster, and provides grants to Radio Free Asia, Radio Free Europe and other news agencies.
Oh and look, your taxes went to fund radio in europe and asia.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:36 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Oh and look, your taxes went to fund radio in europe and asia.
Yeah, because that's exactly what Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia are. Just another radio station in either Europe or Asia.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:37 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Is this what you're going to do now? Follow me around, whining because I'm critical of Trump?
Lol. Like you haven't been responding to me in threads.
You are doing it again.... but but Trump. Maga did this.
Bitch shut the frick up, maga hasnt even been around that long. But you neoliberal cocksuckers have been.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:39 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
But Biden raping kids in his own family is ok
Biden didn’t rape anyone that we know of. He showered with his 13 (?) year old daughter, which is creepy as hell, but it’s not rape.
Also, even if Biden raped 20 nuns it would not excuse Kari Lake if the rebuttal above is true. Your logic excuses all things except the very worse one - the Holocaust I guess. Saddam Hussein killed Kurds with poison gas? Well, what about what Hitler did?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:39 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Yeah, because that's exactly what Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia are. Just another radio station in either Europe or Asia.
Broadcasts radio in eruope and in asia.
Why are we paying to broadcast radio in different languages across Asia?
Looking up the europe one, says its headquarters are in prague.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 3:41 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:40 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I don't like Kari Lake very much. That said, the rebuttal isn't really a direct rebuttal, it's saying "actually it's a pretty good deal."
Whether it is or isn't is unclear, but I suspect one could reasonably conclude that the US Agency for Global Media, something 99% of Americans don't know exists - doesn't need the HQ it has, regardless of whether it's a good deal or whether it's a better situation than it had previously.
Now this is an opinion I can get behind.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:44 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Broadcasts radio in eruope and in asia.
What are they broadcasting?
quote:
Why are we paying to broadcast radio in different languages across Asia?
Again... what are they broadcasting?
Or is it bad simply because it's... in Europe?
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:45 pm to dgnx6
quote:
But where is the lie in this?
Being dishonest includes presenting facts in a way as such to distort the truth.
We didn't pay for them, this whole move to this place saved taxpayer dollars from the previous setup
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:46 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Lol. Like you haven't been responding to me in threads.
When you reply to me, sure. Any others are situational. I certainly haven't spent time following you around the board, whining about what you're posting.
It's weird.
quote:
Bitch shut the frick up, maga hasnt even been around that long. But you neoliberal cocksuckers have been.
See what I mean?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:47 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
They are trying to justify why its costing the tax payers $16 million a year with a "Hey I got a really really good deal" argument, but at the end of the day, its still costing the tax payer $16 million a year for what the author themselves painted as a shite hole.
Plus $27 million in incentives? So the building owner is losing $10 million a year for 15 years? None of this makes sense.
It made sense to me. But then again, I’ve been a part of quite a few office lease negotiations. It’s common to get free rent for a period at the beginning of the lease, and it’s common to get building allowances. I’m told that this is because the rent per foot is a very important number to the building owners and they’d rather concede all kinds of things than to lower that.
I saw $16 million per year for 12 years (3 years free); that’s $192 million in rent. If you subtract the $27 million in incentives you still have $165 million in rent. How did you figure the building management was losing $10 million per year?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:48 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
We didn't pay for them, this whole move to this place saved taxpayer dollars from the previous setup
We absolutely paid for it. And going from being ripped off by 4x to being ripped off by 2x is still being ripped off.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:49 pm to Penrod
quote:
Now this is an opinion I can get behind.
Same.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:56 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
We didn't pay for them, this whole move to this place saved taxpayer dollars from the previous setup
In the same way that not raising the budget by as much as you have raised it in prior years, but still raising it, is considered cutting the budget to a democrat?
You have math... and then you have Washington Math. The two are not the same.
This post was edited on 3/24/25 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 3/24/25 at 3:59 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:I take it you didn't make it far in business finance....
You have math... and then you have Washington Math. The two are not the same.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:00 pm to oklahogjr
He’s a product of Memphis, a cat is smarter than him.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:26 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
I take it you didn't make it far in business finance....
I ain't never even got no schooling. Ain't got one of them there high school diplomas, ain't got enough book learnin' to get a college degree and shore ain't got enuf smarts to get one of them there fancy master degrees. Nope. Too dumb for all of that.
Although I suspect you know exactly what I meant, don't you?
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:28 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
He’s a product of Memphis, a cat is smarter than him.
Cats are smarter than all of us. They've figured out how to get us to fish their poop out of a box of clay and sand and throw it away while they look on disapprovingly.
Posted on 3/24/25 at 4:30 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Although I suspect you know exactly what I meant, don't you?
You'll have to be more explicit. Currently my understanding is that you don't understand how finances are done in business at all since you've only seen this math in washington
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News