Started By
Message

re: Justice Steven's proposed 6 amendments to the constitution

Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25716 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:14 pm to
A 12 year old kid got in an argument with another kid on his bus today. When the first one got off the bus, he grabbed his gun and sprayed the bus down with bullets because he didn't like the outcome of the words spoken.

What do you think that kid would have done if he'd had a bunker buster?
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
20194 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

are there limits to the type of weapons an average Joe citizen should be able to own?


2nd Amendment says right if the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Limits are the very definition of an infringement.
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
20194 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

What do you think that kid would have done if he'd had a bunker buster?


Haha on that kid. He did not have a bunker buster because I bought the last one at Walmart.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41011 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:17 pm to
I'm not saying we should get rid of states. However, the unnecessary duplication of government is stupid. Example: We have a state deptartment of environmental quality, and we have a federal EPA. I don't see why we need both.
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

A 12 year old kid got in an argument with another kid on his bus today. When the first one got off the bus, he grabbed his gun and sprayed the bus down with bullets because he didn't like the outcome of the words spoken.
Obama got a bunch of drones and started bombing the hell out of a bunch of people in the Middle East. What would happen if he got re-elected?

This also happens when the government gets to decide who can use weapons:

Iraq: A Decade of Hell
This post was edited on 5/2/14 at 11:24 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79416 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:23 pm to
quote:

Just to clarify, are there limits to the type of weapons an average Joe citizen should be able to own?


I think the limits will take care of themselves.

People can't afford nukes can they? Nor tanks really.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298834 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

He wants to end gerrymandering



Bye bye Republican party.



This board is good for a few laughs every now and then.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25716 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

Obama got a bunch of drones and started bombing the hell out of a bunch of people in the Middle East. What would happen if he got re-elected? This also happens when the government gets to decide who can use weapons:


So you have a problem with the way one idiot uses weapons, but you want 300 million to have them?

How many times do you want Washington to be bombed, or any state or municipality for that matter, when some political nut job decides he will hold any number of people hostage to extort some untold mean?

What do you think Election Day would be like in this country?

You'd need a bomb shelter to survive when some Falcon's fan goes berserk when Brees passes for 800 yards if you lived in New Orleans.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25716 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:30 pm to
quote:

People can't afford nukes can they? Nor tanks really.


Mass produce them for the masses and they'll get cheap enough for someone to buy them.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85566 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:32 pm to
But at least there would be no statist authoritarianism. That's really all Gmorgan cares about. What seems to be the absurd consequences to us are really just the collateral damage of ideological purity to him.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25716 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

are really just the collateral damage of ideological purity to him.


Damn, that's well stated.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298834 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:34 pm to
quote:


People can't afford nukes can they?


Iran can't get them, Jim Bob certainly has no shot.

We have limits reasonable limits on arms. We don't need any more limits.
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:35 pm to
quote:

So you have a problem with the way one idiot uses weapons, but you want 300 million to have them?
I'm of the opinion that less gun laws/restrictions = less crime and more gun laws/restrictions = more crime. I also do not believe that a violent, criminal entity like government can ever come up with the perfect amount of gun laws/restrictions to stop crimes.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85566 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

criminal entity like government




Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

What seems to be the absurd consequences to us are really just the collateral damage of ideological purity to him.
Seriously?

20th Century Democide
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

Damn, that's well stated.
Not even close.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25716 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:37 pm to
What you're saying works for guns. You can't have Cold Wars and detentes at neighborhood civic associations because neighbors that despise each other have WMDs.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:37 pm to
CFBR, I may find no moral objection to anarcho-capitalism and what they desire but they fail to realize humans are not as smart, trustorthy and capable as they think humans are. Humans still are goung to find some way to frick people over using whatever tools there are.

My only problem with anarcho-capitalism are purely practical.
Posted by Gmorgan4982
Member since May 2005
101750 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:38 pm to
How is it not a criminal entity? Governments are violence and base their existence on theft and acquiring land in ways that most of us are not able to acquire land.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

What seems to be the absurd consequences to us are really just the collateral damage of ideological purity to him.


Well done slim thug.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram