- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: judges side with Trump on ending union bargaining for federal workers
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:15 am to BuckI
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:15 am to BuckI
quote:correct. So public sector unions should be outlawed because it's basically government bargaining with itself and there are zero market forces involved
quote:
Which counts more? A vote or millions in union contributions?
Money.
0
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:15 am to BuckI
quote:I lived in Ohio, you morons sure love your unions even though they are a complete disaster for Ohio and a large majority of the people I knew up there spent half the time either laid off or not working due to strikes
No one should have the power to keep any worker from unionizing.
This post was edited on 8/2/25 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:16 am to narddogg81
Glad my home state is a right to work state.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:18 am to TrueTiger
quote:exactly this. And giving unelected unions and government employees the right to basically dictate how government works is unconstitutional
Unlike private sector unions where both sides have 'skin in the game', both the employer (government) and public sector union are playing with other people's money.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:18 am to BuckI
quote:
No one should have the power to keep any worker from unionizing.
Um, giving federal employees, many of whom work for the dept of defense, the power to strike and collectively bargain as a unit is not the wisest move.
Imagine going to war and then having to settle some union issue.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:19 am to NYNolaguy1
quote:No can do. The union guys cannot strike at DOD installations, at least the ones I have been around.
the power to strike
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:28 am to narddogg81
quote:To say they are always laid off or striking is an exaggeration.
I lived in Ohio, you morond sure love your unions even though they are a complete disaster for Ohio and a large majority of the people I knew up there spent half the time either laid off or not working due to strikes
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:31 am to Jbird
Collective bargaining is legalized extortion.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:35 am to BuckI
We carried baseball bats in our trucks. Not to protect the union line. To destroy those preventing us from going to work.
No one should have the power to prevent a worker from CROSSING THE LINE.
No one should have the power to prevent a worker from CROSSING THE LINE.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 12:41 pm to bluedragon
Factory and mine owners massacred striking workers and their families in the past. Often with government support. So while I do support your right to defend yourself and denounce violence, labor has suffered far worse.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 12:50 pm to BuckI
quote:Yeah, has nothing to do with the bed partners of Fed Gov and shitty unions.
Factory and mine owners massacred striking workers and their families in the past.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 12:58 pm to BuckI
quote:. I said half the time. I didn't know anybody in a union that was fully employed all year, it was just accepted as normal
say they are always laid off or striking is an exaggeration.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:24 pm to Jbird
quote:Why attack the unions and not the shitty owners who massacred the workers before the unions even came into existence? Was it OK for them to kill innocent men, women, and children over a few dollars more?
Yeah, has nothing to do with the bed partners of Fed Gov and shitty unions.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:26 pm to BuckI
quote:
Why attack the unions and not the shitty owners who massacred the workers before the unions even came into existence?
Because one was a problem a 150 years ago and one is a problem today?
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:31 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:It's 'rescinded', for future reference.
That FSLMRS law needs to be recended by Congress.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:34 pm to shinerfan
quote:Funny how that changed when the workers came together. Is it because the unions asked nicely for the owners to play fair?
Because one was a problem a 150 years ago
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:43 pm to BuckI
quote:
They bargain when they vote.
We voted for OMB.
He is bargaining for the voter now.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:51 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:Which proves my point.
We voted for OMB.
He is bargaining for the voter now.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 1:53 pm to BuckI
quote:
BuckI
cant even acknowledge the issues with FedGov employee unions and the broader implications with that "negotiating" dynamic.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 2:16 pm to kilo
quote:because he knows it's a losing argument
issues with FedGov employee unions and the broader implications with that "negotiating" dynamic.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News