Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Judge rules in favor of Trump Administration vs. California over federal land sales

Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:08 pm
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31084 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:08 pm
LINK

quote:

A federal judge in California ruled in favor of the Trump Administration on Thursday, blocking a bill that gave the state the right to thwart the sale of federal lands to private interests, including loggers, oil drillers and developers, reports said.

U.S. District Judge William Shubb ruled against the state’s Senate Bill 50, which gave the State Lands Commission the first right of refusal of the sale of federal lands in California, the Sacramento Bee reported. The bill was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown in October 2017, according to the Sacramento Bee. State Sen. Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica had sponsored the law, the San Francisco Chronicle reported.

The judge’s ruling said the bill is unconstitutional because it “trespasses on the federal government’s ability to convey land to whomever it wants,” the Bee reported.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
15511 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:09 pm to
I don't know if I like this, feds land grabbed a bunch of shite out west and should at least give the states first opportunity to purchase it back.
Posted by RIPMachoMan
Member since Jun 2011
5943 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:11 pm to
I have mixed emotions on the topic.

Is selling federal land under the executive branch's umbrella only? Does Congress get a say?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67115 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I don't know if I like this, feds land grabbed a bunch of shite out west and should at least give the states first opportunity to purchase it back.


I agree that the states shouldn't be allowed to block the feds from selling land, but I think it would only be fair to offer the states the opportunity to purchase it first.
Posted by TROLA
BATON ROUGE
Member since Apr 2004
12348 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:16 pm to
Not a fan of this ruling.. States should have first right of refusal or atleast matching rights.. This seems to double down on Obama’s land grab albeit for opposite reasons
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18005 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I don't know if I like this, feds land grabbed a bunch of shite out west and should at least give the states first opportunity to purchase it back.


You think trump would turn down a best offer from the state just to sell it to a company?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18005 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:20 pm to
Either way I would not be excited with States owning more land either.

Government owning land isn't a good thing.
This post was edited on 11/8/18 at 12:21 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67115 posts
Posted on 11/8/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

You think trump would turn down a best offer from the state just to sell it to a company?


No, but a process that notifies the state and gives them so many days to match said offer seems fair and appropriate, but something that should be done by Congressional statute, not judicial decree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram