- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge Hannah Dugan sentenced to no jail time, $5,000 fine..
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:17 pm to GooseSix
Two tiered justice system. We are being shown that our government will not do what’s right over and over again.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:18 pm to GooseSix
Sending that Lesbian to Lesbian Sex Prison would be a reward for her, not punishment.

Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:19 pm to GooseSix
Did you guys think she was going to do hard time for that? 
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:19 pm to GooseSix
At least she’s off the bench. Probably disbarred as well.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:22 pm to Godfather1
Only some can break the law without punishment.
Most of the tax payers that keep these systems intact don’t have that luxury. Another example of a long list of examples where the judicial fails law abiding taxpayers.
Most of the tax payers that keep these systems intact don’t have that luxury. Another example of a long list of examples where the judicial fails law abiding taxpayers.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:25 pm to GooseSix
That’s absolute fricking bullshite
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:27 pm to GooseSix
quote:Wait what?
This is a situation where an otherwise good person upset by immigration enforcement in this country, a sentiment widely shared, made a bad decision in the moment,” Judge Adelman said in court.
This is how judges base their decisions?
How is this not clearly a liberal af judge letting off an ally?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:27 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
Only some can break the law without punishment.
Almost no one who breaks the law goes to jail for a first offense. That includes basically all non-violent felonies.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:28 pm to GooseSix
frick this worthless count.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:31 pm to Indefatigable
So the courts will allow me leeway on things I disagree with as I’m an otherwise good person?
Yes?
Cuz, the only thing keeping me in line on some things is jail time.
Yes?
Cuz, the only thing keeping me in line on some things is jail time.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:33 pm to Godfather1
Probably disbarred? Just like the convicted FBI general counsel who was originally disbarred? And got community service? And then reinstated? That guy? Klein-something or the other?
Two tier justice system. No doubt.
Two tier justice system. No doubt.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:34 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
So the courts will allow me leeway on things I disagree with as I’m an otherwise good person? Yes? Cuz, the only thing keeping me in line on some things is jail time.
Yes. Most people get very lenient sentences for first time, non violent offense, or they plea and end up on probation.
Very few non-violent first time offenders get prison sentences in state or federal systems. Large drug charges or RICO type stuff would be another exception.
No one is going to serve a prison sentence for the first time offense of obstruction lol.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:34 pm to GooseSix
Judges should be held to a higher standard. That'll never happen.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:35 pm to Indefatigable
Oh, because I keep hearing too many get incarcerated for dindu nuffin…good to know.
Guess all is well for lawbreakers.
Guess all is well for lawbreakers.
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:37 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
Oh, because I keep hearing too many get incarcerated for dindu nuffin…good to know. Guess all is well for lawbreakers.
We agree on the point you’re making btw.
I’m just telling you how it is. A 70 year old with no record was never getting prison in this case for obstruction even if she wasn’t a judge.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:37 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
Probably disbarred?
Yeah well, I had to add the qualifier. There was a time when a felony conviction meant automatic disbarment, but with the state of the legal/judicial system today, who really knows?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:39 pm to Indefatigable
Disbarment is appropriate, yes?
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:41 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
Disbarment is appropriate, yes?
Most places it would be practically automatic. Admittedly idk how Wisconsin is set up.
The LASC would yank her shite for life immediately considering her felony conviction came while she was literally on the bench. There may even be a physical race between the disciplinary board and the judicial commission to see who could have axed her first. But maybe not there. No way to know unless there’s a Badger lawyer on here
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:42 pm
Popular
Back to top

18






