Started By
Message

Judge Hannah Dugan sentenced to no jail time, $5,000 fine..

Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted by GooseSix
Member since Jun 2012
22704 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:16 pm
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
18094 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:17 pm to
Two tiered justice system. We are being shown that our government will not do what’s right over and over again.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
55840 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:18 pm to
Sending that Lesbian to Lesbian Sex Prison would be a reward for her, not punishment.

Posted by lsuguy84
Madisonville
Member since Feb 2009
27951 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38189 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:19 pm to
Did you guys think she was going to do hard time for that?
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89554 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:19 pm to
At least she’s off the bench. Probably disbarred as well.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8303 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:22 pm to
Only some can break the law without punishment.

Most of the tax payers that keep these systems intact don’t have that luxury. Another example of a long list of examples where the judicial fails law abiding taxpayers.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92096 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:25 pm to
That’s absolute fricking bullshite
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92096 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

This is a situation where an otherwise good person upset by immigration enforcement in this country, a sentiment widely shared, made a bad decision in the moment,” Judge Adelman said in court.
Wait what?

This is how judges base their decisions?

How is this not clearly a liberal af judge letting off an ally?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38189 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:27 pm to
quote:

Only some can break the law without punishment.

Almost no one who breaks the law goes to jail for a first offense. That includes basically all non-violent felonies.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:31 pm
Posted by Houag80
Member since Jul 2019
19948 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:28 pm to
frick this worthless count.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8303 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:31 pm to
So the courts will allow me leeway on things I disagree with as I’m an otherwise good person?

Yes?

Cuz, the only thing keeping me in line on some things is jail time.
Posted by Deplorableinohio
Member since Dec 2018
8090 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:33 pm to
Probably disbarred? Just like the convicted FBI general counsel who was originally disbarred? And got community service? And then reinstated? That guy? Klein-something or the other?

Two tier justice system. No doubt.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38189 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

So the courts will allow me leeway on things I disagree with as I’m an otherwise good person? Yes? Cuz, the only thing keeping me in line on some things is jail time.

Yes. Most people get very lenient sentences for first time, non violent offense, or they plea and end up on probation.

Very few non-violent first time offenders get prison sentences in state or federal systems. Large drug charges or RICO type stuff would be another exception.

No one is going to serve a prison sentence for the first time offense of obstruction lol.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
11724 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:34 pm to
Judges should be held to a higher standard. That'll never happen.
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8303 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:35 pm to
Oh, because I keep hearing too many get incarcerated for dindu nuffin…good to know.

Guess all is well for lawbreakers.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38189 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Oh, because I keep hearing too many get incarcerated for dindu nuffin…good to know. Guess all is well for lawbreakers.

We agree on the point you’re making btw.

I’m just telling you how it is. A 70 year old with no record was never getting prison in this case for obstruction even if she wasn’t a judge.
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89554 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Probably disbarred?


Yeah well, I had to add the qualifier. There was a time when a felony conviction meant automatic disbarment, but with the state of the legal/judicial system today, who really knows?
Posted by prplngldtigr
just up da bayou from down
Member since Dec 2004
8303 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
Disbarment is appropriate, yes?

Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
38189 posts
Posted on 7/8/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Disbarment is appropriate, yes?

Most places it would be practically automatic. Admittedly idk how Wisconsin is set up.

The LASC would yank her shite for life immediately considering her felony conviction came while she was literally on the bench. There may even be a physical race between the disciplinary board and the judicial commission to see who could have axed her first. But maybe not there. No way to know unless there’s a Badger lawyer on here
This post was edited on 7/8/26 at 7:42 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram