- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:44 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Hoping he is arguing state law because clearly fed 1.9 doesn’t apply. You agree , right?
He is talking about the invocation of the state secret privilege versus executive privilege.
What are YOU talking about state law for?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:45 pm to SammyTiger
Judge Boasberg violated the rights of numerous Americans when he was on the FISA court. He should not have a security clearance. He failed to disclose a conflict of interest in the present case. He should be impeached. Don't give him jack squat.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:46 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
He is talking about the invocation of the state secret privilege versus executive privilege. What are YOU talking about state law for?
I was hoping he was talking about state law…because there is no way in any world you could argue against executive privilege here. Even a far leftist like you must recognize that.
Especially because it would only support the DOJ. I way to interpret his post otherwise.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:48 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I was hoping he was talking about state law…because there is no way in any world you could argue against executive privilege here. Even a far leftist like you must recognize that.
I was under the impression you went to law school.
Is that accurate?
Because you brought up state law, which makes no senses.
and now you clearly don’t know what is actually covered under executive privilege.
and you didn’t get that a 1.9 in Federal Civ Pro means you got a shite grade in the class.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:50 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:50 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
I was under the impression you went to law school. Is that accurate?
Likely at the same time as you. Then went on. There is no way to interpret that post as anything other than what I said. That is a far leftist like you. You think he would cite a law that supports the president not having to disclose? Occam’s razor.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:52 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
because clearly fed 1.9 doesn’t apply.
It doesn’t apply because it doesn’t exist
Are you drunk?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:53 pm to BBONDS25
None of that made sense dude.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:54 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
It doesn’t apply because it doesn’t exist Are you drunk?
Ask your boy Sammy.
quote:
you’re pretty high and mighty for a dude that just got schooled on state secret privilege. Did you 1.9 Fed Civ Pro?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:55 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
None of that made sense dude.
Your beef is with boozie. Not me.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:56 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Did you 1.9 Fed Civ Pro?
1.9 is a bad grade in law school.
Fed Civ Pro is the class they teach federal civil procedure.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:57 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
1.9 is a bad grade in law school.
Unless you had 1.8 Speight.
quote:
Fed Civ Pro is the class they teach federal civil procedure.
Easily cleared 2.0
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:57 pm to BBONDS25
Every time I think you cannot get more douchey you go ahead and surprise me. Must be a skill you pick up after your second masters degree 
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:58 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Every time I think you cannot get more douchey you go ahead and surprise me. Must be a skill you pick up after your second masters degree
Third, That one is a post doctorate master.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:59 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Third, That one is a post doctorate master.
In sniffing your own farts, no doubt
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:59 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
In sniffing you own farts, no doubt
I mean. You know what an LL.M is. Don’t be such a douche.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:01 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
If he gets it, I’ll bet the farm it ends up leaked to the NYT
Feed him false information then arrest him when it gets leaked.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:02 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
what party is currently trying to invoke the same law?
As it was intended to be used. Now answer MY question.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:02 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
In sniffing your own farts, no doubt
high level commentary there, really serious poster
Posted on 3/20/25 at 10:03 pm to antibarner
quote:
As it was intended to be used.
Insane.
like in 1798 they were sitting around saying “well what if a cartel is committing crimes here and has ties to a foreign governments shouldn’t we add a segment for that? Oh yeah that would obviously be called an invasion or predatory incursion by a foreign nation or government. Can’t think of better way to describe that situation.”
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 10:05 pm
Page 13 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News