- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Boasberg at it again…
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:52 pm to Placekicker
Posted on 12/23/25 at 1:52 pm to Placekicker
explain
1
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:01 pm to Placekicker
Judge Boasberg has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:11 pm to Placekicker
Just tell blow it out your arse, it ain’t happening!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:15 pm to dafif
quote:
The body of the motion/response would be to request judge to go to El Salvador and round up all of the individuals himself that he wishes to bring back and that the government would provide an airplane for him and whoever he wants to bring to go to El Salvador.
To ensure quick compliance they can return by go fast boat. Their belongings can be put in barrels to keep them dry.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:20 pm to Placekicker
Odds that SFP thinks this is judicial overreach….
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:25 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
Odds that SFP thinks this is judicial overreach….
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say the odds are ZERO that he thinks this is overreach.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:26 pm to DawgCountry
Boasberg has reached bedrock yet insists on continued digging...
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:35 pm to Judnnc
quote:
explain
The entire Uniparty is watching everything they do, dissecting every EO and move they make. Any “I” not dotted or “T” not crossed and they will jump in and slap it down.
They try this anyway, even when everything is spot on and in compliance with the Constitution, because of the network of activist judges assigned one job- slap down anything he does.
That’s why all the activist judges’ rulings get overturned on appeal or at SCOTUS.
They’re just using a different kind of lawfare to slow down his agenda.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 2:38 pm to Placekicker
This is the lowlife judge that signed off on phone tapping, where's the plan that Cruz only seems to talk about impeaching this guy??, he who presides as a judge doesn't act like one, he's a criminal!!!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:18 pm to AlterEd
quote:Holy Hyperbole, Batman!!!
How long is the Trump administration going to allow these rogue judges to impede federal law enforcement? Invoke the insurrection act and be done with it.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:20 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Shut the frick up. It's the definition of actual insurrection
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:27 pm to Placekicker
This dude looks like Skeletor.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:29 pm to AlterEd
quote:
It's the definition of actual insurrection
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:15 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Alt Ed is correct-
insurrection
/in"s?-rek'sh?n/
noun
The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
A rising against civil or political authority, or the established government; open and active opposition to the execution of law in a city or state.
A rising in mass to oppose an enemy.
insurrection
/in"s?-rek'sh?n/
noun
The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
A rising against civil or political authority, or the established government; open and active opposition to the execution of law in a city or state.
A rising in mass to oppose an enemy.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:20 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Unlike the Left, the Trump Administration HAS to do everything by the book. There can be no mistakes or a Uniparty lawyer can undo what this Administration is building
This is something a lot of people don't understand. Our side cannot cheat or he will be impeached and it's donezo. Even Republicans would be on board with this as they don't like him either. Any legitimate chance trump gives them to attack, they will. Immediately.
Everything must be in accordance with the law.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:50 pm to Bob the Terrible
quote:
Judge Boasberg has made his decision. Now let him enforce it.
Trump just needs to ignore him...what the hell is he going to do if his order isn't followed? Call out the boy scouts?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:55 pm to DawgCountry
quote:
Odds that SFP thinks this is judicial overreach….
I would imagine he has this idiot judge's picture over his bed...probably jerks to it nightly!
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:09 pm to Placekicker
Yes, Placekicker, you were able to find the dictionary definition of "insurrection." Good boy. Have a cookie.
But a judge issuing rulings that you do not like ... does not REMOTELY fall within that definition, and thus does NOT constitute an "insurrection." HTH.
But a judge issuing rulings that you do not like ... does not REMOTELY fall within that definition, and thus does NOT constitute an "insurrection." HTH.
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:16 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Yes, Placekicker, you were able to find the dictionary definition of "insurrection." Good boy. Have a cookie.
But a judge issuing rulings that you do not like ... does not REMOTELY fall within that definition, and thus does NOT constitute an "insurrection." HTH
Only took you six hours to come up with that one. Strong work!
The judges making these rulings are out of their jurisdiction. Not to mention, their rulings have no basis in the law, only how they FEEL about the situation. SCOTUS has already ruled on this judicial overreach. Yet, they persist. This is but one part of the Deep State staging an insurrection against a sitting President. How many judges did Schumer say they appointed in Biden’s last days? 235?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:19 pm to Da #1 Stunna
Judges are supposed to interpret the law impartially and unbiasedly, subsequently upholding the Constitution. Once you fail to do that, you should be removed from your seat.
Court/ the Law has no place for "activism" which inherently breeds and invites personal bias/emotion. It no longer can even remotely be seen as impartial.
Court/ the Law has no place for "activism" which inherently breeds and invites personal bias/emotion. It no longer can even remotely be seen as impartial.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News