- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:15 pm to bstew3006
quote:but there's been accountability. He already gave you clinesmith
You mock anyone demanding accountability,
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:21 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Also, the FBI, during Biden's Presidency, never made any arrests of the Top 10 FBI's Most Wanted criminals in this country.
In the span of a few months, under Trump and Kash, the FBI has caught them all. No news coverage of that. Almost like they don't want anyone to know.
In the span of a few months, under Trump and Kash, the FBI has caught them all. No news coverage of that. Almost like they don't want anyone to know.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:22 pm to ezride25
quote:
ETA: whom sfp is already defending
Of course he is...
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:24 pm to ezride25
quote:
Let me guess why you think that…
Because he has a scorching case of paranoid TDS and anything that proves a criminal conspiracy against Trump by his Democrat heroes gives him the sads and TDS angries.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:24 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
but there's been accountability. He already gave you clinesmith
What a scalp on the wall! Justice served
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:27 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
quote:
but I'll clarify it fully for you
please dont.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:27 pm to bstew3006
quote:
Oh, now it’s “opinion guides the final product”? Cute pivot
No pivot
Maybe you understand the (simple) argument finally and will stop embarrassing yourself lying
quote:
When it was convenient, you framed it as a neutral process
Maybe not
I clearly used subjective. I never said neutral
quote:
now you’re defending the result as subjective judgment
That literally has always been the argument
quote:
And saying “I never claimed they were innocent” is such a weak dodge
No Dodge
You just lied and I pointed it out
quote:
You posture like you’re above it all, but your whole act is just partisan absolution
When you lie sure
Why do you continue to lie?
Why not discuss this honestly based on my actual stances and arguments?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:29 pm to bstew3006
quote:
Ah, the classic slowfanni shuffle: defend the behavior,
Never did that
quote:
justify the outcome
I never did that
quote:
But let’s be real, you spent half this thread defending Obam
I did not
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:29 pm to KCT
quote:
Why can't you just admit that you hate Trump and you've also always ran interference for Obama and his minions? (SPOILER ALERT: After all these years it's not like you're fooling anybody).
Exactly. His TDS is CRAZY.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
Why are you posting so many times in this thread? No one gives a frick what you have to say.
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:43 pm to bstew3006
quote:SpECiFiCaLLaY CoVeReD!
quote:
but there's been accountability. He already gave you clinesmith
What a scalp on the wall! Justice served
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:muh Clinesmith
quote:
justify the outcome
I never did that
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:46 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Why are you posting so many times in this thread?
Originally to educate people who clearly need assistance
Now it's addressing straw men and lies
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:47 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
muh Clinesmith
Citing the example where objective fraud occurred is not justifying anything, except the Truth
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:48 pm to UncleFestersLegs
dont believe your lying eyes!
-ShillForProgs
-ShillForProgs
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Citing the example where objective fraud occurred is not justifying anything, except the Truth
Let's review:
quote:
quote:
A “differing interpretation” doesn’t excuse altering intel, lying to a FISA court, or concealing findings that contradicted the chosen narrative or their framing…That’s not opinion, that’s misconduct
You ignored all that which I pointed out. Your response was that your specifically addressed it and presented clinesmith's prosecution as evidence... of...what exactly?
Posted on 7/24/25 at 3:58 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
You ignored all that
I specifically did not. I sided the person who actually lied to the fisa court who was prosecuted
quote:
and presented clinesmith's prosecution as evidence... of...what exactly?
See above
What Clinesmith did was actually fraud though, and it was nothing like what is in the memo. He literally edited evidence that was submitted to the court, which is an objective case of fraud where we're not revealing an opinion or subjectivity
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:you what?
specifically did not. I sided the person who actually lied to the fisa court who was prosecuted
The whole Clinesmith "prosecution" was total horseshite and you know it. I can't believe you are even pretending to hide behind that frickery
Posted on 7/24/25 at 4:12 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
you what?
*Cited
Using voice to text
quote:
The whole Clinesmith "prosecution" was total horseshite and you know it. I can't believe you are even pretending to hide behind that frickery
The point, as usual, is over your head. His example is one of actual fraud and he was prosecuted for it. Specifically lying to the fisa court, which is what I responded to specifically.
There's no such direct evidence of an objective fraud by Obama and company and their actions are shielded in subjectivity and opinion. What Clinesmith did was objective fraud because he actually edited evidence that he submitted to the court. You can't use opinion to get out of that one.
They should illustrate the difference in the two cases and why one was easy, despite what I imagine you're arguing is a light sentence, and why the prosecution against Obama and his executive agents will not be as easy. It really can't be made more simple for you
Popular
Back to top


0





