- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: John Bolton indicted
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm so deep inside your head (my actual meaning btw) it's almost like I'm posting for you.
1
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:07 pm to boosiebadazz
Pence, too.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:07 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I'm so deep inside your head (my actual meaning btw) it's almost like I'm posting for you.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:07 pm to Bunk Moreland
If you believe John Bolton is, or ever was, a white hat, you're a fricking retard.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:08 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I showed him a few weeks ago that we were discussing Bolton 8 frickin years ago and following him this entire time.
I never trusted the guy for a second and highly doubt that I've said anything in his defense in my entire life.
quote:
Predictably he just gave some retarded response about how, "yeah, that was eight years ago (lol emoji)".
That's always a favorite. They've totally flipped their positions. 2017-2020 it was "All of this stuff you're discussing is fantasy and is never going to happen". Now that we're finally seeing building momentum toward holding these folks to account not only on the big stuff, but all the way down to mortgage fraud, it's become "Just because the same people who have been in the crosshairs for almost a decade are being pursued for crimes committed, it's been too long for this to have anything to do with anything".
As if there's a statute of limitations on suspicions.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:09 pm to AlterEd
quote:
a fricking retard.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
I know you're confused. It's ok. I'm just having fun, trying not to work. If I get too bored I'll start boozing.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:09 pm to AlterEd
OK, fren. I will enjoy the rest of Red October.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:10 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
and highly doubt that I've said anything in his defense in my entire life.
That is not the same as showing your work on how you foretold his involvement in the GTOE and this crime in particular.
quote:
"All of this stuff you're discussing is fantasy and is never going to happen".
Update: it hasn't happened.
Evidence: see above comment.
quote:
Now that we're finally seeing building momentum toward holding these folks to account
Look at this double pivot
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What does Bolton's indictment have ANYTHING to do with the GTOE?
How is Bolton involved? What did he do? What overlap do these facts have to do with the facts of the GTOE?
Just making sure we have this on the current page of the thread for the inside information types to answer, finally.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:25 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
never trusted the guy for a second and highly doubt that I've said anything in his defense in my entire life.
Right. A lot of anons thought the guy was an ally because because he was being used by the first Trump admin to "clean out" the white house or whatever, but if you look at the cast of characters Trump has to work with during his first term, every damn one of them was a deep state piece of shite. I personally have known the guy as a warhawk piece of shite since the Bush administration and have been waiting for this sack of shite to get his comeuppance for a very long time.
It's funny though how he was linked to "the pen" in the Q drops. Remember the photo of him outside the Biden Penn center holding an umbrella that read "the pen" on the canopy?
Turns out it was a reference to him writing classified information on his little yellow notebooks and selling that information.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:28 pm to Bunk Moreland
Qbots are going to have a hard time reconciling that "drop"
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:30 pm to idlewatcher
I just did. Also, Q himself celebrated Bolton being fired. So that isn't some gotcha like you guys think it is.
This post was edited on 10/17/25 at 12:32 pm
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:32 pm to AlterEd
Q says conflicting shite
News at 11
News at 11
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Speculation at the time, from some, was that he was selling classified information to Iran. It will be interesting to see if that's what it turned out to be.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
When I asked you if the Russia gate case was justified you responded “sincere? No”
You completely changed my question to give the answer you wanted. You didn’t respond yes, no , maybe or I don’t know. In the definition of justified sincere is no where to be found.
Very slick Willy of you. Hell it’s worse. You didn’t even put forth “depends on your definition of justified” lol
This is what you do to win.
You completely changed my question to give the answer you wanted. You didn’t respond yes, no , maybe or I don’t know. In the definition of justified sincere is no where to be found.
Very slick Willy of you. Hell it’s worse. You didn’t even put forth “depends on your definition of justified” lol
This is what you do to win.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
News at 11
It's "Film at 11".
Not "News at 11".
fricking millennials.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:40 pm to goatmilker
quote:
When I asked you if the Russia gate case was justified you responded “sincere? No”
You completely changed my question to give the answer you wanted.
No. You asked really 2 questions. I'll quote
quote:
The Russian fake crime to spy on a campaign was all legal to you and justified ?
I discussed the legal specifically.
Justified required you to further define. I gave one path, but I phrased it as a question to permit you to refine it as you intended. Giving you the option to refine your comment, while still commenting one possibility, is not as you described in the initial quote above.
quote:
You didn’t respond yes, no ,
Because that question required more refining for such a binary response.
Your ability to refine that is still open, FWIW.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:43 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Speculation at the time, from some, was that he was selling classified information to Iran.
At the time? Care to link that? Because I keep asking for it. Hell I was just asking for specifics on that angle prior to Trump's latest election.
Instead I got melts like this, avoiding answering like the plague
quote:
My favorite recent wrinkle is that we can't possibly be excited about the Bolton indictment because we didn't talk about wanting to see Bolton strung up by his pinkie toes the same way we have waxed eloquently about Schiff, Brennan, Clapper, Strzok, McCabe, HRC, Hussein, Lisa Monaco, Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, et al.
Posted on 10/17/25 at 12:44 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I know you're confused. It's ok. I'm just having fun, trying not to work. If I get too bored I'll start boozing.
Don't start boozing!
it is not good for you. You will end up in the hospital with an alcoholic hole in your stomach ulcer. watch a movie. stay here and debate dweebis.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News