- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
January 6 panel staff reportedly angry at Rep. Liz Cheney
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:28 am
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:28 am
Shocker
Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.
Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the Jan. 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined militia groups and extremism.
LINK
Several committee staff members were floored earlier this month when they were told that a draft report would focus almost entirely on Trump and the work of the committee’s “Gold Team,” excluding reams of other investigative work.
Potentially left on the cutting room floor, or relegated to an appendix, were many revelations from the “Blue Team” — the group that dug into the law enforcement and intelligence community’s failure to assess the looming threat and prepare for the well-forecast attack on the Capitol. The proposed report would also cut back on much of the work of the Green Team, which looked at financing for the Jan. 6 attack, and the Purple Team, which examined militia groups and extremism.
LINK
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:29 am to Jbird
quote:
which looked at financing for the Jan. 6 attack
Audit the pentagon to find out where the funding came from. Oh wait
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:32 am to Jbird
LMAO. Did these people seriously not understand this whole shite show was, from the start, 100% about taking down Trump? Like, are they really stupid enough to have the absurd idea they were taking part in a legitimate investigation?
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:35 am to Jbird
I want to know why Pelousy was fully prepared and had a camera crew on site.
PD1/6.
PD1/6.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:36 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:this
I want to know why Pelousy was fully prepared and had a camera crew on site.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:37 am to Jbird
... makes you wonder now doesn't it ...
Are they getting ready for Team UP-YOUR-arse ???
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:38 am to Bunk Moreland
The J6 committee is completely and absolutely illegitimate.
This post was edited on 11/24/22 at 8:39 am
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:38 am to Jbird
Why are they angry? It was clear early on that the Jan 6th committee was purely for political purposes. It's why most of the Jan 6th footage has been hidden. Only a very tiny portion of that shite has been released.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:42 am to Plx1776
quote:This makes the Decatur class happy.
It was clear early on that the Jan 6th committee was purely for political purposes. It's why most of the Jan 6th footage has been hidden. Only a very tiny portion of that shite has been released.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:42 am to Jbird
Trump must’ve given that loony the mushroom
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:47 am to Jbird
So, IOW, exculpatory "evidence" that could exonerate Trump is being omitted while only "evidence" that say OMB is included.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:48 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:Like I said, why the Decatur class cheers shite like this.
So, IOW, exculpatory "evidence" that could exonerate Trump is being omitted while only "evidence" that say OMB is included.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:52 am to Jbird
Her name was Rosanne Boyland.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:55 am to Jbird
All these colors. Sounds like some sort of color revolution.
https://www.e-ir.info/2009/07/31/explaining-the-color-revolutions/
https://www.e-ir.info/2009/07/31/explaining-the-color-revolutions/
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:57 am to Bunk Moreland
"Chaney", not "Cheney"?
Does he misspell her name on purpose?
Does he misspell her name on purpose?
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:58 am to LookSquirrel
I'm pretty sure it's on purpose. He called Maggie Haberman "Hagerman" a few weeks ago.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:59 am to Jbird
Liz Cheney is one of the good Republicans. I like her a lot.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 9:00 am to NPC
Member since Nov 2022
2 posts
fricking alters
2 posts
fricking alters
Posted on 11/24/22 at 9:01 am to Jbird
This is why on Jan 1 the House Republicans should investigate the Jan 6 committee.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News