- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s baffling how Chinese construction has defied post 911 physics.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:37 pm to 3down10
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:37 pm to 3down10
quote:
I've seen the damage, it was minimal and did no damage to it's core.
There was significant damage to the base of the building. That is not minimal damage.
1
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:40 pm to Clames
quote:
Just tons of debris from the other buildings and uncontrolled fire for hours on end. You loons need to get a life and a grade-school level of physical science education.
None of those frickers have probably never been around when a tree is cut down, how much the ground shakes when it hits, not to mention two 110 floor buildings.
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:46 pm to Nurbis
quote:
There was significant damage to the base of the building. That is not minimal damage.
Yes, it's minimal damage. And if the damage was enough to collapse the building, it would have happened when it hit.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 4:47 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
None of those frickers have probably never been around when a tree is cut down, how much the ground shakes when it hits, not to mention two 110 floor buildings.
WT7 didn't fall until later in the afternoon. 30 minutes after the BBC reported it had fallen...with it in the background still standing.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 5:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Because you believe what you choose to believe.
I've been debating this topic for 23 years and I doubt you're actually saying anything new. Your claim is the same claim NIST makes.
In the end your argument is just an appeal to authority logical fallacy.
If you think I just want to believe people in the intelligence agencies of this world did this because it somehow benefits me, then you're an idiot. It's a hell of a burden to know the truth about these things.
Posted on 11/29/25 at 5:50 pm to Figgy
quote:
So who put the explosives up there and when did they do it?
Well the buildings were bought 6 months prior to them coming down. So after that.
Security was run by Marvin Bush, whose company also was in charge of security for United Airlines and Dulles International.
He also served on the board of the company that insured the WTC.
You know, Bush, son of former CIA head George Bush?
In short, carried out by Zionists as a false flag attack to sink the US into spending trillions in the middle east in bullshite preemptive wars as part of their permanent revolution strategy for global domination.
That's my best guess anyway. Like it or not, we have rogue elements in our government, and pretending they don't exist isn't helping.
Edit: Forgot to mention they have many government contracts and have national-security exemptions from investigation.
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 11/29/25 at 7:32 pm to 3down10
quote:
And if the damage was enough to collapse the building, it would have happened when it hit.
Did both towers collapse when they were hit or later?
Also, in the Oklahoma City Building, notice that the giant columns at the four corners of the building are still intact.
The OKC building and WTC 7 were built from different materials.
There was no raging fire in the Oklahoma City Building.
The OKC building was 9 floors vs 47 for the WTC 7 building, which means a frick ton more weight to carry when you start taking out its foundation.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News