- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/6/19 at 10:37 pm to Bayoubred
quote:
in ref to the audio evidence that you say has been refuted. What way was it refuted? I understood that it was, in fact, the police frequency recording. Is that in dispute? I have always held the view from the recording that the last two shots were too close together to be from one gun. Theres adequate time lapse between the first two but not two and three. Fill me in on the latest please
This is a pretty good summary on how "the recording of four gunshots on police Dictabelt" is, scientifically speaking, EXTREMELY weak.
wikipedia: John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording
quote:
The John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording was a recording from a motorcycle police officer's radio microphone stuck in the open position that became a key piece of evidence cited by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) in their conclusion that there was a conspiracy behind the assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963. Made on a common Dictaphone dictation machine that recorded sounds in grooves pressed into a thin vinyl-plastic belt, the recording gained prominence among Kennedy assassination conspiracy theorists from 1978, in which the HSCA used it to conclude that there was a "high probability" that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone and that the Kennedy assassination was the result of a conspiracy.
Later scientific examination discredited this interpretation of the evidence.
Posted on 3/7/19 at 2:06 pm to Bulldogblitz
quote:
Oswald is a sharpshooter.
Did he qualify as Sharpshooter or Marksman? There's a difference between the two in terms of skill that may be relevant to your point.
Which, I agree, is puzzling.

Back to top
