- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is the Libertarian Party of Louisianan a real thing?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:02 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:02 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Neither does a "Republican" supporting gun control.
No one is talking about Republicans
quote:
Say it out loud. Just admit it.
Yes i dont want illegals having guns. Sorry that bothers you cuck
0
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:05 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
No one is arming them.
quote:
When it comes to self defense in this country, regardless of whom is here, theyre entitled to self defense.
People coming to visit or work should be able to defend themselves.
Not sure, but I think it is Mensa members like you.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:08 am to troyt37
quote:
Not sure, but I think it is Mensa members like you.
then go lobby for more firearm laws, chief.
Dont spout your gun control here, join and march with the white women in pussy hats.
Yall need more government to hide from Mensa members like me.
This post was edited on 3/21/24 at 8:09 am
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:12 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
then go lobby for more firearm laws, chief.
Hate to break the news to you, Skippy, but no more firearm laws are needed. Much like the border situation, the laws that have been in place for decades are more than sufficient, they just have to be enforced.
quote:
Dont spout your gun control here, join and march with the white women in pussy hats.
I used to think you were intelligent. I may not have ever been more wrong.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:15 am to troyt37
quote:
Hate to break the news to you, Skippy, but no more firearm laws are needed.
Good. Then we are in agreement.
quote:
right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:15 am to troyt37
quote:
I used to think you were intelligent.
\
Someone may have thought you werent a progressive at one time too, but here you are spouting gun control.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:18 am to BuckyCheese
quote:
Tell me this is a troll.
It is not. The Libertarian party is an open door and all drugs legal party.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:18 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Good. Then we are in agreement.
quote:
right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed
12c. Are you an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:19 am to troyt37
quote:
but no more firearm laws are needed. Much like the border situation, the laws that have been in place for decades are more than sufficient, they just have to be enforced.
shall not?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:21 am to troyt37
quote:
Why does buttbuddy Rog support and defend criminal illegals
He's only defending their rights
quote:
ut doesn't pick up that same fight for his fellow Americans?
I have yet to see Rog support gun laws, generally.
quote:
That is the important question.
A bad question built on a lack of logic and a straw man.
quote:
THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE shall not...
"The people" has never meant citizens, exclusively.
Rights specifically reserved to citizens use the language "citizen".
quote:
Criminal illegals are not citizens of that free state
Irrelevant
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
shall not?
Asked and answered, idiot. Use that little wheel on your mouse, if it isn't all jammed up with the boogers you pick.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:22 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He's only defending their rights
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He's only defending their rights
Criminals lose their rights, it's a thing.
quote:
I have yet to see Rog support gun laws, generally.
I have yet to see your buttbuddy lament the places that violated the 2A for citizens in this country.
quote:
A bad question built on a lack of logic and a straw man.
Logic dictates that if you want to arm criminal illegals, you also want to arm the law abiding. One wonders how your buttbuddy would feel seeing a busload of armed criminal illegals getting off in his hometown.
quote:
"The people" has never meant citizens, exclusively.
Right, I'm sure they were talking about the people of Britain and France too.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:30 am to troyt37
quote:
Criminals lose their rights, it's a thing.
Yay for government.
What about asylum applicants?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:31 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
What about asylum applicants?
Asylum applicants apply for asylum in the first country they come to.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:32 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Debatable.
No it isn't.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:33 am to troyt37
quote:
Criminals lose their rights, it's a thing.
Even if you want to make this argument (and it's an anti-2A argument), they lose their rights at conviction.
These people haven't been convicted, so that argument is dead.
quote:
I have yet to see your buttbuddy lament the places that violated the 2A for citizens in this country.
That's only how children and idiots engage in discussion.
There are nearly infinite examples of things you're now requiring him to respond to in order to discuss this with you. Seems illogical.
quote:
Right, I'm sure they were talking about the people of Britain and France too.
You need to read up on the Constitution, its authors, and the USSC precedents.
James Madison specifically argued that these rights and protections extended to everyone, citizen or non-citizen.
The USSC has ruled that non-citizens have Constitutional protections in the 1800s. This is not a recent development.
Your interpretation has never been the law of the land.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:33 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
No it isn't.
Evidently smore knowledgeable people disagree. And here we are.
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:34 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
No it isn't.
It's not debatable because it's always applied to non-citizens.
Our courts are just correcting bad laws infringing on the 2A, like Buren and Heller
Posted on 3/21/24 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These people haven't been convicted
I think the ruling said such. We dont remove natural rights for people who aren't convicted of a crime.
Maybe these folks didnt read it.
quote:
"The Court finds that Carbajal-Flores' criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense,"
Page 5 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News