- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Investigators for Attorney DePerno Reportedly Discover Modem Chips Embedded in Michigan Vo
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:00 pm to musick
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:00 pm to musick
quote:it would be totally overkill and technologically silly to have a modem for updates. if the device was truly designed to not connect to something as wide open as a cellular network or the internet, the device would have a physical port for someone to connect a device to it so admin mode could be accessed for the purposes of updating the machine. the update would be on that piece of hardware. no network connection needed. at all. this is 101 kind of stuff and no team would overlook this detail in the very first design meeting. tons of devices have such a port just in case the device can't access the internet for updates or configuration
They'll say it's for software/firmware "updates"
0
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:05 pm to EA6B
quote:how do you know? were you in the design meetings? have you been in testing and demonstration meetings? do you know what's going on behind closed doors? no.
The modems are used to
quote:if you think that couldn't be hijacked for other purposes, then you're naive
to report vote tally’s to central tabulations systems among a multitude of other things
quote:no they do not require that as i just explained
They require cellular modems since not every voting location has the necessary connectivity with the required security measures
quote:given that they are not necessary and complete overkill and a security risk, yes. there's pretty much only one purpose for them. you seem to forget that politicians, even democrats, were complaining for years about the security risk these devices posed.
People are acting like these modems were installed solely for the purpose of committing fraud
quote:so criminals obey the law now? well that's a revelation.
what it can be used for is regulated by the Federal Election Commission and the voting machine design must conform to the National Institute of Standards guidelines for voting machine telecommunications linked here
so you can personally guarantee that no criminals hijacked that communications system for nefarious purposes? if not, then the modems are a HUGE problem
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:09 pm to texridder
quote:not as ignorant as you, i can assure you of that
How ignorant are you fools?
quote:this has nothing to do with anything. care to comment on the huge security risk just revealed in these devices instead of changing the subject with a pointless observation?
Why do you think Trump didn't sound off against ES&S about the election.
quote:given the last thread on vote switching, do you REALLY want to go down this road again?
If ES&S was switching votes it sure as hell wasn't switching them to Biden
quote:pre-election expectations?? what the hell is this? you think that means anything irl? it's like election polls. they're throwing darts blindfolded
Trump exceeded pre-election expectations in virtually all the states that use ES&S
quote:do you want me to link the other thread?
Y'all are clueless
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:11 pm to EA6B
quote:you apparently don't realize that the people with the encryption keys are the ones alleged to have committed fraud
Maybe become familiar with the current state of data encryption
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:13 pm to mmcgrath
quote:well sure. that's the advertised design. that hardware absolutely opens up the possibility that someone could be accessing that data.
both the voting machines and servers were designed to be on a VPN and prevent access to the internet
you people are making this wayyyyyyyyyy harder than it is. hackers pull off exponentially harder tasks
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:32 pm to bfniii
quote:
given the last thread on vote switching, do you REALLY want to go down this road again?
Heh, a-hole, you following me around again.
Posted on 4/13/21 at 8:35 pm to GhostOfFreedom
Most secure election evahhhh!!!
Modems were installed to ensure the security obviously
Modems were installed to ensure the security obviously
Posted on 4/13/21 at 11:10 pm to bfniii
quote:
Why do you think Trump didn't sound off against ES&S about the election.
quote:You think the fact that ES&S, which has been linked to the Republican Party forever, had the ability to connect to the internet built into is machines, has nothing to do with anything. You are just plain ignorant.
this has nothing to do with anything. care to comment on the huge security risk just revealed in these devices instead of changing the subject with a pointless observation?
quote:You are pathological. You somehow ignore that fact that you make yourself look like a dumbass in every thread you post in.
given the last thread on vote switching, do you REALLY want to go down this road again?
This post was edited on 4/13/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:34 am to texridder
quote:still salty about the last thread?
you following me around again
Yeah, I'm following you around. Look at when I joined and how many posts I've made.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:36 am to texridder
quote:in the context of this thread, correct. Totally irrelevant.
You think the fact that ES&S, which has been linked to the Republican Party forever, had the ability to connect to the internet built into is machines, has nothing to do with anything
quote:lol. Go look at the last responses in the previous thread. Apparently other people think YOU were the one who looked stupid
You are pathological. You somehow ignore that fact that you make yourself look like a dumbass in every thread you post in.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 10:48 am to texridder
quote:
You somehow ignore that fact that you make yourself look like a dumbass in every thread you post in.
Diddler frustrated and talking about himself again. Must be a day that ends in y.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 2:42 pm to bfniii
quote:
Go look at the last responses in the previous thread. Apparently other people think YOU were the one who looked stupid
That must be the one where I told you to GFY. That still goes.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:01 pm to texridder
Ok. Well that's unfortunate. I presented a reasonable case based on facts. I asked you straightforward questions that you didn't answer. Instead of trying to be open minded, this is the garbage I get. You post frequently but why should anyone take you seriously on any topic? You know your performance was embarrassing so I can only conclude that your intention is nothing more than to be adversarial. You have no beneficial purpose.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:12 pm to bfniii
quote:
I presented a reasonable case based on facts.
You never present a reasonable case based on facts.
Come on. Post an example right here. An actual example. Not your usual bullshite describing your post and how great it was and how everyone else was wrong.
Just the post itself.
Not a chance.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 3:18 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
That's nice. Since I am just quoting the report that was written by the "Stop the Steal" guy I guess you think he is full of shite and should be ignored. So maybe just delete this thread since it is based on his report?
I don’t give a shite what he said. If he thinks you can’t get data in or out of a machine over the internet with that modem he is full of shite... and if you believe him so are you. Did you even read the data sheet for the modem? It’s internet friendly and IOT ready. INTERNET of things ready.
This post was edited on 4/14/21 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:30 pm to texridder
quote:1. FACT - Vote switching videos (you ran from that thread)
Post an example right here
2. FACT - modems in voting machines
3. FACT - the cyber report detailing the connections with foreign countries
4. FACT - fanning's data which hasn't been debunked
5. FACT - hearings with experts detailing precisely how the vote switching was likely perpetrated, i.e. the "algorithm" among other things
6. FACT - antrim county
Now let's hear yours. Or at least your response to the above. You never do either. All you do is criticize people posting REAL information and post some irrelevant bullcrap like es&s to distract from the damage
You know this is becoming a habit. You ask for readily available info. I post it. You leave with your tail between your legs and people mocking you as you exit. It's pathetic.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 4:35 pm to RoyalAir
The ones used to execute justice for treason.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 7:45 pm to bfniii
quote:
1. FACT - Vote switching videos
2. FACT - modems in voting machines
3. FACT - the cyber report detailing the connections with foreign countries
4. FACT - fanning's data which hasn't been debunked
5. FACT - hearings with experts detailing precisely how the vote switching was likely perpetrated, i.e. the "algorithm" among other things
6. FACT - antrim county
No. No. No. slimball.
This is what you posted:
quote:
I presented a reasonable case based on facts.
I asked for you to post an example of one of YOUR posts of a reasonable case based on facts. Not a lists of bullshite generic topics for me to refute.
Of course you won't do that. Post one of of your "fact based" posts.
It will never happen. You are too much of a chickenshit to make an actual responsive post.
Posted on 4/14/21 at 7:56 pm to texridder
Texretard arrives!
Posted on 4/14/21 at 8:54 pm to texridder
quote:the specific case i have made on this topic is that the machines were capable of being connected to the internet despite statements to the contrary by dominion and krebs. that statement has now been substantiated by the fact that cellular modems were found in the machines. this is further bolstered by the data in the cyber report and fanning's information and the story with the italians. do you have a refutation, yes or no? if you don't, why don't you either be open minded to the possibility that you were wrong or STOP WASTING EVERYONE'S TIME
I asked for you to post an example of one of YOUR posts of a reasonable case based on facts
quote:so you can't refute it. that's all you had to say. just admit you're a fraud. everyone knows it already
Not a lists of bullshite generic topics for me to refute
quote:tex, what i just stated is IN THIS THREAD. all you had to do was just go back a few posts. wow
Post one of of your "fact based" posts
quote:tex, i don't even know what to say. honestly, you may be mentally deficient.
You are too much of a chickenshit to make an actual responsive post
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News