Started By
Message

re: If (God willing) EPA gets slapped down, SOTU could get spicy

Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by LSUfor8
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2018
323 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:25 pm to
Your posts today regarding the issues before the Supreme Court, their decisions and ultimate ramifications are so enlightening for this non-lawyer. Thank you so much.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67074 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:28 pm to
Your posts today regarding the issues before the Supreme Court, their decisions and ultimate ramifications are so enlightening for this non-lawyer. Thank you so much

That makes me very happy to read.

Being a Constitutional Law professor is sorta my dream job, but I didn't have the grades to get an affordable scholarship for an LLM or the right clerkships, and I've never been able to get a job where I could get first hand paid experience litigating those kinds of issues. I did TA Constitutional Law back when I was in Law School.
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 4:29 pm
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
1914 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:32 pm to
All the goods that we import from China that uses modern day slavery & pollution that truly is a long-term environmental issue In China where they are basically held to no laws remotely close to what we have to abide by, so it becomes impossible to compete.

It’s like fighting with one hand tied behind our backs.

China gets a free environmental pass, while we have to be part of this Paris Climate BS that TRUMP PULLED US OUT OF, only for the Dementia Patient to re-sign us up to the money laundering scheme of “climate hoax”

But I will say, China & India & other big countries with industrial revolutions etc…. do need some regulations, they are the ones destroying the world and over fishing the seas as well
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
49169 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:39 pm to
Wickard was an FDR era decision.

No real big surprise there.

quote:

By the time that the case reached the high court, eight out of the nine justices had been appointed by President Franklin Roosevelt, the architect of the New Deal legislation. In addition, the case was heard during wartime, shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor galvanized the United States to enter the Second World War.[5][6] The decision supported the President by holding that the Constitution allowed the federal government to regulate economic activity that was only indirectly related to interstate commerce.
This post was edited on 6/25/22 at 4:42 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57205 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:43 pm to
So he'll need several Depends changes during his speech?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67074 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 4:44 pm to
It also said that a farmer who grew wheat on his own farm for his own personal consumption (i.e. not selling it), was somehow bound by the Agricultural Adjustment Act because growing your own crops for your own consumption, never selling it, impacts interstate commerce in the aggregate (i.e. if everyone did that).

It's literally the worst decision in the history of the Supreme Court which still has not been overturned.
Posted by LSUfor8
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2018
323 posts
Posted on 6/25/22 at 8:34 pm to
This makes me very sad. Keep doing what you’re doing and you’ll be happy. Grades do not reflect true intelligence or morality. I’d rather have the latter than the former.

IRL, you’ve impacted a lot of people today. At the end of the day, that’s the true measure of intelligence.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram