re: If 1/6 was an “insurrection”, why wasn’t the 2011 storming of Madison WI by union goons?

No, they didn’t challenge the monopoly of power of the centralized government and put sitting members of Congress in danger.

But I wouldn’t have shed a tear if a US Marshal smoked the first Ashley Babbitt ANTIFA goon to breach the doorway of the federal courthouse in Portland.

Find you some principles and stand by them.

Then tell me why the LA riots and numerous other riots throughout US history have necessitated the invocation of the insurrection act!

I’ll give you time to pursue one of your far-left lunatic sites you get your talking points from to formulate an answer.

boosiecuck is melting all over the board because she wanted to keep Muh insurrection talking points going into next year’s election. She knows dems are going to get mopped across the floor if they have to run on their record.

quote:

---

I was in 4th grade when he did it.

---

Found your problem

quote:

---

Find you some principles and stand by them.

---

Boos, I see you're making the effort to have a consistent position, but I just think you're taking the wrong position. There would be no two situations that are completely alike, that would both demand the exact same approach. Waay too nuanced. To me it's simple: police use of deadly force is ONLY justified in the case that the officer or someone else within his immediate area of view is clearly at IMMINENT risk of DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM. Imminent. You won't honestly attempt to make the argument that Babbitt posed that officer IMMINENT RISK OF DEATH OR GREAT BODILY HARM, would you?? Using the most strict interpretation of each of those pivotal terms and words......

Talk to LSU about my history and political science degrees.

But more to the point, what does the insurrection act have to do with the riots in the summer or January 6th. I can spit our random laws just as good as the next guy, but you’ve yet to tell us why the Insurrection Act is germane to the ANTIFA riots or The Ron Watkins Insurrectionary Riot of January 6th

quote:

---

boosiecuck is melting all over the board because she wanted to keep Muh insurrection talking points going into next year’s election. She knows dems are going to get mopped across the floor if they have to run on their record.

---

It's amazing to witness. Such a clown poster

CHOP or whatever it was called sure seemed insurrectiony and revolty to me. I believe one of the key components of an outright case of insurrection is indeed revolt, which itself requires the overt renunciation of allegiance to the U.S. government (and by extension, Constitution). The CHOP thing seemed closest to that strict interpretation of "insurrection" and "revolt" than anything else seen thus far. They literally declared themselves no longer under the control of the U.S. government. And it was an organized effort.

quote:

---

It's amazing to witness. Such a clown poster

---

She just argued that last summer’s riots weren’t an insurrection, even though the insurrection act has been invoked throughout US history for riots.

She has a history degree from LSU too, ask her professors how smart she is.

You should square up your comma splices and general coherency of your argument before we go any further with this tap dance.