Started By
Message

re: I don't understand the Georgia poll results so far.

Posted on 9/29/22 at 3:35 pm to
Posted by Goforit
Member since Apr 2019
4754 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 3:35 pm to
Polls are worthless!
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Kemp has a significant lead on Abrams, yet Walker is about 4 points behind Warnock. How could some of the same people voting for Kemp also vote for Warnock over Walker? Makes no sense to me and makes me think the fix is in again.
Spoken like someone who cannot see beyond team jerseys.

Anyone who votes straight ticket should be removed permanently from the voting rolls. They are simply too stupid to be trusted with the franchise.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 3:52 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

Democratic Party loathes the Constitution


Holy Hyperbole, Batman.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

Trump endorsed a guy that is doing good to string a sentence together…
Like draws like.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
47899 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:07 pm to
Kemp is a Democrat
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

We don't need him to draft brilliant legislation, we just need for him to vote for conservative legislation and reduce the power of the insane leftists that are eviscerating our country by every single metric possible.
Translation: “I am voting for perhaps the dumbest candidate in the history of Senatorial politics, because I think he will follow the orders given to him by his betters.”
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

he's probably the least able candidate a major party put up in modern history.
quote:

Hank Wilson would like a word.

Irony.

The man’s name is Johnson.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

If I were Independent now way would I vote anything Democratic this election cycle
If you were Independent, you would also be more open-minded and objective than the blind partisan that you actually are

Who knows how that hypothetical person might vote?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

you just invent b.s about other people.
Yep.
quote:

can't you debate?
Nope.
quote:

what a loser.
Yep.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

quote:

Sanders is very intelligent.
seriously? Some old crusty dolt who thinks socialism is more beneficial to capitalism after honeymooning in the USSR
quote:

quote:

amusing you list Warren. she's brilliant.
And wrong on every position.
You are just proving his point.

He is arguing intelligence, and your response it that the person in question does not share your opinions and ideology.

And I honestly think that you do not understand the difference.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 4:52 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

none of you even spell out your objection to swalwell
quote:

It's been a national story, mensa.

It is hilarious to watch all of you just jump to the conclusion that this guy KNEW that the chick that he was fricking was a ChiCom agent.

Psssstttt. Spies do not usually tell you that they are spies.

Complain about his ideology all you want. I will probably agree with you. But THIS issue is just painfully stupid.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

You think a smoke show Chinese spy (Christine Fang)was sleeping with him (Rep. Swalwell) because she liked him?
You seem to have a very different definition of “smoke show” than the rest of the civilized world. At best, she was marginally-cute … a high-6 or low-7.



But the real question is not whether SHE liked him. She was (allegedly) a spy. Of course not. The QUESTION is whether HE thought she was fricking him because she liked him.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 4:54 pm
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

quote:

guy who believes in abortion right up to the moment of birth
you will need a link for that. no one believes you.
The sad thing? They do.

A LOT of them think that every Dem supports abortion at any time and for any reason.

Newsflash: Most do not.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Sanders is very intelligent and so is aoc.
I guess you'd have to define "very intelligent".
quote:

its amusing you list Warren. she's brilliant.
Warren is bright. But again, you'd have to define "brilliant".

Warren graduated from a smallish OK public HS, and was neither Valedictorian or Salutatorian there. But she did kick arse on the debate team.

Meaning? Who knows?
Posted by BamaMamaof2
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2019
2390 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:14 pm to
Here is the bill he helped introduce that supports abortion right up to the moment of birth!
LINK /
Posted by BamaMamaof2
Atlanta, GA
Member since Nov 2019
2390 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:15 pm to
We believe it because it is true! Here is the proof!
LINK /
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Warren is bright. But again, you'd have to define "brilliant". Warren graduated from a smallish OK public HS, and was neither Valedictorian or Salutatorian there. But she did kick arse on the debate team.
That she is probably brighter than 90% of her critics.

Is that “bright enough” to qualify her for the job? Maybe not. “Top ten percent” is kind of the lowest level of qualification, as far as I am concerned.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

no one believes you.

Then, no one is smart!






Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

That she is probably brighter than 90% of her critics.
quote:

Is that “bright enough”
quote:

“Top ten percent” is kind of the lowest level of qualification, as far as I am concerned.
Wha'cha drinkin' friend?
Posted by Clemsontigers02
Member since Sep 2020
743 posts
Posted on 9/29/22 at 5:48 pm to
Senators vote with their party like >95% of the time. It’s voting for an ideology and not a candidate.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram