- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I don't support regime change in Venezuela
Posted on 11/30/25 at 5:36 am to SOSFAN
Posted on 11/30/25 at 5:36 am to SOSFAN
quote:
What yall don't see is this is disrupting the cartels delivery system and making them use land, which is easier to stop.
Huh? The cartels have been using land for 70 years. It is their primary path into the U.S.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:23 am to SloaneRanger
Start a war with who?
Ill equipped revolutionary force using pop guns?
Easier than taking Quebec.
Ill equipped revolutionary force using pop guns?
Easier than taking Quebec.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:34 am to ArcticTiger
quote:
F That!! I have worked with and are friends with a few that were fortunate to escape from Venezuela. Maduro must go by whatever means necessary!!
You need to read the post that is directly above yours.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:36 am to RollTide1987
quote:
I disagree 100%.
Because regime change has worked out so well for us in the past.
It is a drain on our resources, and it benefits only the global elite.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:38 am to bluedragon
quote:
Easier than taking Quebec.
Which is why Trump is picking on Venezuela.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:40 am to CCTider
If Don Jr. uses blow, it would seem to be recreational only. Hunter, on the other hand, made it a lifestyle.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:45 am to RollTide1987
quote:
are heavily in bed with the Russians and the Chinese
Have you thought about how that happened?
It isn't because Russia and China are constantly bullying them.
Same goes for countries in African where the Russians and Chinese have gained footholds.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:52 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
Because regime change has worked out so well for us in the past.
It has in the western world. We carried out regime changes in Germany, Panama, Grenada, and Japan (heavily westernized) quite successfully in the past. It is in the Middle East, where the culture is so alien to us, that we have struggled. Despite this, however, Iraq has turned into something of a success story. Afghanistan was our only true L in the regime change department.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 7:57 am to scrooster
quote:
I was involved in two. Urgent Fury and Just Cause.
Thank you for your service, but those were like an FBS team playing an HBCU team.
Fortunately, we lost very few soldiers, and the monetary cost was minimal.
Invading Venezuela would be more on the scale of the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:16 am to Capitalist
quote:
The only good communist is a dead one.
This is not a "regime change". This is taking out of a communist regime that has killed millions of Americans with the funneling of fentanyl into our country.
This is taking out of regime and restoring a democratically elected Republic.
Hopefully the Mexican Cartels and Castro Cuba is next on the list.
Those are noble causes, but history shows it never works out that way.
We lose hundreds, if not thousands, of young American soldier lives.
We spend billions of dollars supporting the inevitable occupation.
The people who we "liberate" will eventually come to hate us.
And the global elite profit off the sacrifices of our soldiers and tax payers.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:23 am to PurpleCrush
quote:
Maybe some oil, black gold? Texas tea
Venezuela is home to the world's largest known reserves. Larger even than Saudi Arabia's known reserves.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:27 am to Tiger985
quote:
We have a border. Secure it.
There is very little global elite profit to be made from that tactic.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:29 am to goldennugget
quote:
The Bush neocon warmongering never seemed to have left the GOP sycophants.
The irony is, Dick Cheney despised Trump, but now Trump is doing his bidding.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:31 am to goldennugget
Might be easier to deal with now than in a decade when our enemies are more involved and our president ends up being some progressive jackass.
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 9:33 am
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:37 am to RollTide1987
quote:
It has in the western world. We carried out regime changes in Germany, Panama, Grenada, and Japan (heavily westernized) quite successfully in the past. It is in the Middle East, where the culture is so alien to us, that we have struggled. Despite this, however, Iraq has turned into something of a success story. Afghanistan was our only true L in the regime change department.
You seem to have forgotten about Iran.
Did you say Iraq has turned into something of a success story?
In what sense?
Grenada and Panama? Come on. That was like a grown man beating up children.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:43 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
You seem to have forgotten about Iran.
Once again...a culture and religion that is foreign to western values.
quote:
Grenada and Panama? Come on. That was like a grown man beating up children.
What do you think Venezuela will be?
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 9:45 am
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:44 am to goldennugget
Why not. Seems they need it.
If we can help bring it about without firing a shot?
If we can help bring it about without firing a shot?
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:48 am to RollTide1987
quote:Germany and Japan weren’t ‘regime change.’ They were the product of total war. That means unconditional surrender, every institution shattered, every military unit dismantled, borders redrawn, and the victors occupying the country with absolute authority. You’re comparing a situation where the old state was razed to the ground with modern regime change, where the goal is to swap governments without burning the entire society to the ground.
It has in the western world. We carried out regime changes in Germany, Panama, Grenada, and Japan (heavily westernized) quite successfully in the past. It is in the Middle East, where the culture is so alien to us, that we have struggled. Despite this, however, Iraq has turned into something of a success story. Afghanistan was our only true L in the regime change department.
One is renovating the bathroom. The other is bulldozing the house and starting over. They do not belong in the same conversation.
Regime change is the opposite approach: keep the country standing, pull out the leadership, and hope the rest doesn’t collapse. That model has never worked consistently because you’re trying to swap the software without reinstalling the operating system.
Panama and Grenada were small, contained operations. If those are your ‘success stories,’ your bar is set below ground level.
So if your plan is to speed-run WWII every time you want a new government somewhere, go ahead and say that. But don’t pretend Iraq is evidence of success. It gave us civil war, sectarian cleansing, ISIS, and a permanently fractured state that only stabilized once we half-accidentally drifted into a quasi-occupation anyway.
If the only examples you can point to require world-ending war, total surrender, and generational rebuilding, congratulations you just proved the strategy doesn’t work under any conditions short of total war, which I assume is the opposite of what you were going for.
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:50 am to rtr72
Golden Nugget is a complete fraud and always has been. He doesn’t know what he believes but is certain Trump isn’t the answer but Democrats might be. Homeboy is utterly lost
Posted on 11/30/25 at 9:56 am to northshorebamaman
quote:
Germany and Japan weren’t ‘regime change.’ They were the product of total war. That means unconditional surrender, every institution shattered, every military unit dismantled, borders redrawn, and the victors occupying the country with absolute authority.
You’re comparing a situation where the old state was razed to the ground with modern regime change, where the goal [Iraq] is to swap governments without burning the entire society to the ground.
Well stated truth of the matter.
quote:
One is renovating the bathroom. The other is bulldozing the house and starting over. They do not belong in the same conversation.
Great analogy
quote:
So if your plan is to speed-run WWII every time you want a new government somewhere, go ahead and say that. But don’t pretend Iraq is evidence of success. It gave us civil war, sectarian cleansing, ISIS, and a permanently fractured state that only stabilized once we half-accidentally drifted into a quasi-occupation anyway.
Ooof. Bullseye.
This post was edited on 11/30/25 at 9:57 am
Popular
Back to top


0





