Started By
Message

re: I am sure the nomination of Kash Patel had nothing to do with backdating the pardon to '14

Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:39 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43929 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974

Yeah ... the entirety of his term in office. From inauguration day until the day he resigned.

So what's your point?
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
15077 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:20 pm to
So Trump got impeached for trying to shine a light on what Hunter was doing in back in’14.

He needs to stick to his guns and burn this whole mofo thing down.
This post was edited on 12/1/24 at 10:22 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477232 posts
Posted on 12/1/24 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Yeah ... the entirety of his term in office. From inauguration day until the day he resigned.

This doesn't matter in the context of your argument

Ford gave Nixon a blank pardon for crimes for which he had not been charged or indicted. The same logic applies to all the crimes Hunter has not yet been charged with or indicted for.

Clearly the pardon over the actual litigated crimes has historical precedent.

To avoid any potential crawfishing. Your comment at issue

quote:

You can't pardon someone for something they haven't been charged with.
This post was edited on 12/1/24 at 10:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram