- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hugh Hefner was into Beastiality
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:02 am to Revelator
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:02 am to Revelator
quote:I don't know why you are pretending to be oblivious to the point. It has nothing to do with Hefner. The reality is that when women do this they should be ignored if not mocked. Heck. It's precisely because he's such low-hanging fruit that makes this absurd. Ignoring this woman doesn't require you to suddenly have a good opinion of Hugh Hefner
Yeah, Heff was a paragon of virtue
1
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:04 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I don't know why you are pretending to be oblivious to the point. I
And I don’t know why you are so vociferously defending Hefner in this thread?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:05 am to Revelator
quote:this is lazy. You should be ashamed of yourself honestly. You should know better. At no point in this thread have I defended Hugh Hefner. I don't have a very high opinion of him at all. But you were effectively taking the stance that just because he wasn't a good guy it means that you should be accepting of any and all things said about him. That's toddler thinking
And I don’t know why you are so vociferously defending Hefner in this thread?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:07 am to Revelator
I mean you do realize that both things can be true right? Hugh Hefner not being a good guy and this woman being an obvious liar are not mutually exclusive.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:08 am to Revelator
All I know is Hoe's lie.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:09 am to JayDeerTay84
quote:
All I know is Hoe's lie.
How dare you? She was a Sunday School teacher!
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:09 am to ShortyRob
quote:
But you were effectively taking the stance that just because he wasn't a good guy it means that you should be accepting of any and all things said about him.
Nope. Even If the dog story was never mentioned, what was known of Hefner is enough for the Left to shun him, but they didn’t.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:10 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I mean you do realize that both things can be true right? Hugh Hefner not being a good guy and this woman being an obvious liar are not mutually exclusive.
Sure. If the woman is lying, it still doesn’t change the point of my OP
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:13 am to Revelator
quote:
Nope. Even If the dog story was never mentioned, what was known of Hefner is enough for the Left to shun him, but they didn’t
He's dead. I'm not sure exactly how you shun a dead person. Have you been seeing a bunch of super positive eulogies about Hugh Hefner recently?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:14 am to Revelator
quote:
Sure. If the woman is lying, it still doesn’t change the point of my OP
Cool. Alas. The OP wouldn't even exist but for this woman.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:19 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Cool. Alas. The OP wouldn't even exist but for this woman.
And we wouldn’t be going round and round if you hadn’t hijacked the thread. But here we are
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:24 am to Revelator
quote:it isn't hijacking your thread to point out the obvious. I didn't change the subject. The bottom line is you started a thread based on a story with a severe lack of credibility. Just because you don't like the target of the story. That is not a good Paradigm with which to live in
And we wouldn’t be going round and round if you hadn’t hijacked the thread. But here we are
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:25 am to ShortyRob
quote:
it isn't hijacking your thread to point out the obvious. I didn't change the subject. The bottom line is you started a thread based on a story with a severe lack of credibility. Just because you don't like the target of the story. That is not a good Paradigm with which to live in
So if I had instead titled my OP,” Hugh Hefner is a pervert” that would have been better?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:29 am to Revelator
quote:you seem hyper focused on the bestiality part but I am not. You started the thread because some woman came out making some accusation 40 plus years after the fact. The end. There would have been no thread absent her silliness. We flat-out do not want to live in a society where we generally accept random 40 year old accusations no matter how much we dislike the target. I can't stand Obama but if sumbitch comes out saying he raped her when he was 20 she can go f*** herself
So if I had instead titled my OP,” Hugh Hefner is a pervert” that would have been better
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:29 am to Revelator
Not going to stand up for this guy because I don’t know if this is true or not. But what a dirtbag move to come out against a guy after he’s dead.
If this were really true why not bring this up when he’s alive? Pretty sure even California has laws against this, don’t they? And even if they don’t the negative publicity would be a good way vilify him in the court of public opinion.
So are we trying to sell books or do the right thing and tell the truth about him? I think everybody can figure this out.
If this were really true why not bring this up when he’s alive? Pretty sure even California has laws against this, don’t they? And even if they don’t the negative publicity would be a good way vilify him in the court of public opinion.
So are we trying to sell books or do the right thing and tell the truth about him? I think everybody can figure this out.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:30 am to Revelator
Besides a thread that starts by saying Hugh Hefner was a pervert is right up there with water is wet in terms of threads
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:31 am to ShortyRob
quote:
you seem hyper focused on the bestiality part but I am not.
Sure I am. That’s why after the initial post, I said the dog incident was irrelevant.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:32 am to Revelator
quote:yes but you keep bringing it up as if it's what I've been talking about which clearly I have not
Sure I am. That’s why after the initial post, I said the dog incident was irrelevant
Posted on 1/25/22 at 7:48 am to ShortyRob
Well then, no one should ever read any history books, because a majority of those come out after the people have died.
Hefner was nasty. Some gross stuff. My problem with her is that she stayed with him even after knowing he got sexual with a nasty dog. Gross. How could you even touch the man after that?
Hefner was nasty. Some gross stuff. My problem with her is that she stayed with him even after knowing he got sexual with a nasty dog. Gross. How could you even touch the man after that?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:02 am to Revelator
Isn't he dead?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News