Started By
Message

re: How dumb do you have to be to fall for the Russia collusion hoax to begin with?

Posted on 5/21/23 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84151 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 1:59 pm to
Correct Obama and Hillary did Dixridder.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295829 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

I can't believe this topic has gone on for 6 pages with the usual crew desperately and maniacally holding on to this shite


Its amazing. Debunked as a fraud, and this idiot would rather by wrong than admit the truth.
Posted by 20 ton
BR
Member since Aug 2013
936 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:15 pm to
The Steele Dossier had every thing to do with lying to the FISA court and getting illegal wire taps on Page and two steps into Trumps campaign. Wasn’t attacking a political opponent what got everybody stirred up when Trump told Z about a video that looked bad.

Spending a million dollars to print lies and peddle to news media to print without verification is much worse. Hell they offered Steele a million dollars to verify it and he couldn’t. Yet they used it two or three more times. Doesn’t it piss you off for that offer to even been given? Where is your fury about that.

Many in the media have down played the investigation because the lack of convictions. Who reimburses carter page for his legal fees after exculpatory evidence was altered to keep this NO evidence narrative going.

Say what you want but Brennen’s hand written notes prove it was known to be a Hillary campaign operation in July of 16. Everything after that is BS.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Correct Obama and Hillary did Dixridder.

Wrong again, beaver teeth.

The investigation was initiated by the release of emails and the Australian ambassador's report of conversation with Papadopoulos.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15431 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Australian ambassador's report of conversation with Papadopoulos.


The ambassador that’s repeatedly stated that Papadopolus didn’t state anything of any substance?
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9284 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:25 pm to
There is nothing that can be shown or said that will get you off this lie.

And that’s why people choose to go to hell
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

The ambassador that’s repeatedly stated that Papadopolus didn’t state anything of any substance?

A. Can you prove that; and

B. Did you read Durham's report.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295829 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

The Steele Dossier had every thing to do with lying to the FISA court and getting illegal wire taps on Page and two steps into Trumps campaign.


Exactly.

They know its fake, even retard Tex is obfuscating so he doesnt have to deal with reality.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14935 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

Doesn’t it piss you off for that offer to even been given?

Yes, it did poss me off that the offer was given.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84151 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:35 pm to
Dixridder still believes.

Another fricking simp.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
85266 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:36 pm to
Just thumbing through a few random threads from 2017 or so when we realized The State had been weaponized against Trump:
quote:

Why did the liberal, lyin media so candidly reveal illegal behavior of a presidency they protect? Why didn't any conservative media recognize this obvious disclosure prior to the tweets? This is such a clearly manufactured controversy to deflect attention from 2 cabinet members having had contact with the Russians and then lying about it. If there is any media collusion it's Bannon's Breitbart - the seminal source - and Trump's tweets
-
-Cwill

quote:

Trump and you guys seem pretty desperate.

-VOR

quote:

David Frum @davidfrum · 16m Trump has brilliantly changed the subject from “Is he a Russian intelligence asset” to “Is he a dangerously violent lunatic?"


quote:

Trump hasn't "defeated" anything. The investigation simply isn't leaking. Also, is it inconceivable that folks can point out that he is an unhinged lunatic AND maintain the Russian narrative? In what world are these mutually exclusive?

- Sleauxplay

quote:

, Trumpkins should celebrate this investigation. I mean if you are a true believer and believe your choice for president is a stand up guy, then this investigation will prove that

-ASURob

quote:

Is there anyone in the Trump Admin without ties to Russia? The optics, as usual, are craptastic.

-A want

quote:

Still can't figure out why Trump even stayed in America. Should have moved to Russia a long time ago

LSU1NSEC

quote:

Robert Mueller is staffing up by hiring senior people who have experience with Watergate/Mafia/Enron type of stuff. His investigation will build slowly. There is nothing quite like Trump's known ties to the Russian mafia, and it insults our intelligence to try to argue that it's somehow normal for New York. It wasn't just some sexed-up British dossier that made international allies think something was wrong with the Trump campaign, it was other stuff as well. That's why Dutch, British, Australian, Polish, German, & French intelligence all raised alarm bells to the U.S. intelligence community in 2016. They didn't do it for nothing.


- Doc Fenton

quote:

Thank God. Good investigative work has led to the indictment of a likely Russian spy at the highest level of the Trump campaign. Great job by the Obama/Trump justice department!


- JuiceTerry

quote:

How else was Obama supposed to know if bmhe was really a Russian spy?

-oklahomgjr




And then what I said in March 2017 :

quote:

If I were to speculate I would guess You are looking at this backwards . Trump has something. There is a lot of smoke, a lot of supporting evidence about leaks and Eight years of Obama lawlessness to reflect on. I think that Obama bet on HRC winning and subsequent Democratic DOJ quashing any record of it. I think there is a paper trail leading right back to the Obama Administration , it's probably going to be "strictly legal" but historically unethical and will reveal that intelligence and the Dems are actively targeting their domestic enemies using the Russians as a ruse/cover story to collect domestic intelligence . I think it's plausible that all the "Russian " hysteria might be a defensive effort to undermine Trump prior to all this leaking out. Again, I would bet there is an irrefutable paper trail leading to an actual wiretapping that is impossible to refute so they had to shift the argument prior to it being released. That's my guess.


quote:

The level of coordination required , at the highest levels, between the intelligence community agencies and the Administration to do this would make me consider whether the country is already lost after eight years of post- constitutionalism. And whether this cold cultural war is about to go hot. We can either have The Left or the Constitution, but not both


If you go back and read these thread the stridency of the true moral idiots ( Cwill, A Want etc) is directly proportional to how wrong they were. There seems to be some cosmic connection, some force in the Universe, that gives those who are the most catastrophically wrong about a thing, the most certainly that they are correct. From topic to topic, it’s the same clowns , mocking the board, who are always proven wrong by the facts. It’s a Foolishness in the biblical meaning of the word, where hubris meets falsehood.











Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
84151 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:46 pm to
Man there's some names.

Almost as full of shite as the current crop of Dixridder class
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66555 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:48 pm to
Excellent work, detective pimp.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295829 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:52 pm to
Most of those people are gone off the board, probably realized they had made fools of themselves.

At least some of them might have had self awareness. Tex is still digging.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66555 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

If I were to speculate I would guess You are looking at this backwards . Trump has something. There is a lot of smoke, a lot of supporting evidence about leaks and Eight years of Obama lawlessness to reflect on. I think that Obama bet on HRC winning and subsequent Democratic DOJ quashing any record of it. I think there is a paper trail leading right back to the Obama Administration , it's probably going to be "strictly legal" but historically unethical and will reveal that intelligence and the Dems are actively targeting their domestic enemies using the Russians as a ruse/cover story to collect domestic intelligence . I think it's plausible that all the "Russian " hysteria might be a defensive effort to undermine Trump prior to all this leaking out. Again, I would bet there is an irrefutable paper trail leading to an actual wiretapping that is impossible to refute so they had to shift the argument prior to it being released. That's my guess.



Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
15431 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

Can you prove tha


His own words prove it. He’s on tape saying such.

quote:

Did you read Durham’s report


Yes, Durham interviewed him as well and he once again said that PapaD didn’t offer anything of substance.
Posted by bamadontcare
Member since Jun 2013
3574 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

If I were to speculate I would guess You are looking at this backwards . Trump has something. There is a lot of smoke, a lot of supporting evidence about leaks and Eight years of Obama lawlessness to reflect on. I think that Obama bet on HRC winning and subsequent Democratic DOJ quashing any record of it. I think there is a paper trail leading right back to the Obama Administration , it's probably going to be "strictly legal" but historically unethical and will reveal that intelligence and the Dems are actively targeting their domestic enemies using the Russians as a ruse/cover story to collect domestic intelligence . I think it's plausible that all the "Russian " hysteria might be a defensive effort to undermine Trump prior to all this leaking out. Again, I would bet there is an irrefutable paper trail leading to an actual wiretapping that is impossible to refute so they had to shift the argument prior to it being released. That's my guess.



NostraPimpus
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66555 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

PapaD


This post was edited on 5/21/23 at 3:28 pm
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
24599 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

How dumb do you have to be to fall for the Russia collusion hoax to begin with?


Celticdog level stupid.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42319 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:35 pm to
Maddow & Olbermann fans.

Drinkers of Bud Light. That’s who.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram