- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How Do We Take The Word
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:19 am to Grobins
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:19 am to Grobins
quote:
Grobins
Let me ask you a question...
What happens when you find out Mueller had confirmed within 2-3 months of starting his investigation that there was absolutely no collusion/conspiracy between Team Trump and any Russians, and yet never said anything about this and continued the investigation for another 15-16 months?
And, the 10 instances of Trump potentially “obstructing” came AFTER those 3 months?
Have you even thought about the significance of that?
You know he’s innocent 3 months in. Which means you know that he knows he’s innocent. So you know when he starts complaining and telling his surrogates to not cooperate that he’s obviously not doing so because he’s trying to hide or coverup something, you logically know he’s only doing all this because he’s pissed off he’s being railroaded for something you and he knows he didn’t do.
And yet you keep going and tallying up instances of Trump angst, and then you document them as possible instances of obstruction of an investigation that you already had a conclusion for 16 months prior.
Seriously, have you wondered why Mueller doesn’t want to go in front of Congress, while contemplating the fact he would be asked these exact questions I just mentioned?
Or do you just not care because you hate Trump too much?
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 12:21 am
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:20 am to indianswim
quote:
I’m willing to bet I scored higher than you in English on both the ACT and SAT than you. I scored perfect in both. So unless your reading comprehension standards are different than most of academia, I suggest you pick another fight.
*on. Oh it does say ULM. You’re funny... lmao
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:20 am to fr33manator
quote:
He’s adorable isn’t he?
We are told not to suffer fools, but shite, they make me laugh.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:21 am to indianswim
I'm a fricking dumbass redneck and I am smarter than this libtard
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:26 am to Grobins
quote:
Grobins
Honestly, you couldn't think of a better board name than this? It sounds like a new verb describing what Sleepy, Creepy Uncle Joe likes to do to young girls in public.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:28 am to BeefDawg
quote:
Seriously, have you wondered why Mueller doesn’t want to go in front of Congress, while contemplating the fact he would be asked these exact questions I just mentioned?
Prolly the same reason Barr was afraid to go in front of the House. Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller. Or, the same reason Sessions decided to recuse himself. The reality is he will go if subpoenaed. But Trump has already led you to believe he won’t be truthful because he had a conflict, I mean wanted a job and didn’t get it or whatever else he can think of off the cuff. Smh
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:30 am to Grobins
quote:
on. Oh it does say ULM. You’re funny... lmao
I had a full ride plus to LSU. Hated the coach I’d have to compete for. I could get into any school I wanted.
I’m fine and dandy where I’m at. You seem to need help.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:30 am to Grobins
quote:
Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller
*Trump nor his children.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:32 am to Grobins
quote:
Grobins
Number of Posts: 98
Registered on: 1/13/2004
15 years on this site. 98 posts; 17 in this thread alone.
Yeah, you don’t reek of an alter/sleeper account or anything.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:34 am to indianswim
quote:
I had a full ride plus to LSU. Hated the coach I’d have to compete for
You, my friend, did not score perfect on the English part of the ACT or SAT.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:36 am to Grobins
Act and sat are not relevant to politics and common sense.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:36 am to Godfather1
quote:
Yeah, you don’t reek of an alter/sleeper account or anything.
I’m bored. Also, quantity does not always equate to quality. Oh yeah, you prolly only eat at buffets. Lol
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:37 am to Grobins
quote:
Also, quantity does not always equate to quality.
In your case, neither applies.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:38 am to King
quote:
Act and sat are not relevant to politics and common sense.
“I liiike da way you talk...” in my Billy Bob voice. Lol
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:45 am to Grobins
But you assume cowardice and deify McCain. Hot take!
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:49 am to Grobins
quote:
Prolly the same reason Barr was afraid to go in front of the House. Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller. Or, the same reason Sessions decided to recuse himself. The reality is he will go if subpoenaed. But Trump has already led you to believe he won’t be truthful because he had a conflict, I mean wanted a job and didn’t get it or whatever else he can think of off the cuff. Smh
You completely avoided my main question. Why?
We already know Mueller knew Trump was innocent inside a few months of beginning as SC.
Think about that for a goddamn minute.
If you were accused of a crime, but you knew you were innocent, and the investigators knew you were innocent, how wrong would it be for the investigators to keep slandering you, and then anytime you angrily lash out and go, “frick you for this witch hunt”, they then claim everytime you did this you were trying to obstruct their investigation?
Do you care that this is what has just happened?
They know you’re innocent, but claim your angst and non-cooperation is obstruction attempts.
How is that logical? It’s not and you damn well know it.
If they know you’re innocent, they obviously know there’s no reason for you to try to hide or coverup anything.
But you won’t acknowledge this because it buttfricks all your bullshite narratives, doesn’t it.
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:52 am to Grobins
quote:
speak to Putin by himself without any counsel despite the fact that he’s always having to be handled by his staff in order to try and stop him from putting his foot in his mouth.
What the frick
Posted on 5/31/19 at 1:02 am to BeefDawg
quote:
If you were accused of a crime, but you knew you were innocent, and the investigators knew you were innocent, how wrong would it be for the investigators to keep slandering you, and then anytime you angrily lash out and go, “frick you for this witch hunt”, they then claim everytime you did this you were trying to obstruct their investigation?
So you are alluding to intent or state of mind, the defense Barr provided in his “summary” briefing. The reality is that the SC office never leaked a thing during their investigation. Your reference is more in regards to media speculation, which was rampant. I think we are both in agreement that our media is biased and prefers to add opinion opposed to stating dry facts.
The reality, an innocent man would not concern himself with the opinion of sheep. If you read why their was “insufficient evidence” not “no evidence” of collusion as presented by Mueller, you would probably reconsider the premise of your argument. The appearance of cooperation is debunked when you read the collusion conclusion my friend.
Honestly, this is what frustrates me about Mueller, he assumes people will read. He needs to testify and should have been allowed to present his findings since Barr didn’t read the report before he “summarized” it. His findings have been completely opposed by Mueller and shown to be exaggerations on behalf of Barr. That should be an impeachable offense itself.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News