Started By
Message

re: How Do We Take The Word

Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:19 am to
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Grobins

Let me ask you a question...

What happens when you find out Mueller had confirmed within 2-3 months of starting his investigation that there was absolutely no collusion/conspiracy between Team Trump and any Russians, and yet never said anything about this and continued the investigation for another 15-16 months?

And, the 10 instances of Trump potentially “obstructing” came AFTER those 3 months?

Have you even thought about the significance of that?

You know he’s innocent 3 months in. Which means you know that he knows he’s innocent. So you know when he starts complaining and telling his surrogates to not cooperate that he’s obviously not doing so because he’s trying to hide or coverup something, you logically know he’s only doing all this because he’s pissed off he’s being railroaded for something you and he knows he didn’t do.

And yet you keep going and tallying up instances of Trump angst, and then you document them as possible instances of obstruction of an investigation that you already had a conclusion for 16 months prior.

Seriously, have you wondered why Mueller doesn’t want to go in front of Congress, while contemplating the fact he would be asked these exact questions I just mentioned?

Or do you just not care because you hate Trump too much?
This post was edited on 5/31/19 at 12:21 am
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:20 am to
quote:

I’m willing to bet I scored higher than you in English on both the ACT and SAT than you. I scored perfect in both. So unless your reading comprehension standards are different than most of academia, I suggest you pick another fight.


*on. Oh it does say ULM. You’re funny... lmao
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:20 am to
quote:

He’s adorable isn’t he?



We are told not to suffer fools, but shite, they make me laugh.
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18426 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:21 am to
I'm a fricking dumbass redneck and I am smarter than this libtard
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18717 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:22 am to
What were yours?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55438 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:22 am to
3.50, accumulative.
Posted by KCT
Psalm 23:5
Member since Feb 2010
38911 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:26 am to
quote:

Grobins


Honestly, you couldn't think of a better board name than this? It sounds like a new verb describing what Sleepy, Creepy Uncle Joe likes to do to young girls in public.
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:28 am to
quote:

Seriously, have you wondered why Mueller doesn’t want to go in front of Congress, while contemplating the fact he would be asked these exact questions I just mentioned?


Prolly the same reason Barr was afraid to go in front of the House. Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller. Or, the same reason Sessions decided to recuse himself. The reality is he will go if subpoenaed. But Trump has already led you to believe he won’t be truthful because he had a conflict, I mean wanted a job and didn’t get it or whatever else he can think of off the cuff. Smh
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18717 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:30 am to
quote:

on. Oh it does say ULM. You’re funny... lmao


I had a full ride plus to LSU. Hated the coach I’d have to compete for. I could get into any school I wanted.

I’m fine and dandy where I’m at. You seem to need help.
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:30 am to
quote:

Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller

*Trump nor his children.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79618 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:32 am to
quote:

Grobins
Number of Posts: 98
Registered on: 1/13/2004


15 years on this site. 98 posts; 17 in this thread alone.

Yeah, you don’t reek of an alter/sleeper account or anything.
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:34 am to
quote:

I had a full ride plus to LSU. Hated the coach I’d have to compete for


You, my friend, did not score perfect on the English part of the ACT or SAT.
Posted by King
Deep in the backwoods
Member since Sep 2008
18426 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:36 am to
Act and sat are not relevant to politics and common sense.
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:36 am to
quote:

Yeah, you don’t reek of an alter/sleeper account or anything.


I’m bored. Also, quantity does not always equate to quality. Oh yeah, you prolly only eat at buffets. Lol
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79618 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:37 am to
quote:

Also, quantity does not always equate to quality.


In your case, neither applies.
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:38 am to
quote:

Act and sat are not relevant to politics and common sense.



“I liiike da way you talk...” in my Billy Bob voice. Lol
Posted by DumbCollegeKid
Steens,Ms
Member since Apr 2013
1620 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:45 am to
But you assume cowardice and deify McCain. Hot take!
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:49 am to
quote:

Prolly the same reason Barr was afraid to go in front of the House. Or, the same reason Trump not his children met with Mueller. Or, the same reason Sessions decided to recuse himself. The reality is he will go if subpoenaed. But Trump has already led you to believe he won’t be truthful because he had a conflict, I mean wanted a job and didn’t get it or whatever else he can think of off the cuff. Smh

You completely avoided my main question. Why?

We already know Mueller knew Trump was innocent inside a few months of beginning as SC.

Think about that for a goddamn minute.

If you were accused of a crime, but you knew you were innocent, and the investigators knew you were innocent, how wrong would it be for the investigators to keep slandering you, and then anytime you angrily lash out and go, “frick you for this witch hunt”, they then claim everytime you did this you were trying to obstruct their investigation?

Do you care that this is what has just happened?

They know you’re innocent, but claim your angst and non-cooperation is obstruction attempts.

How is that logical? It’s not and you damn well know it.

If they know you’re innocent, they obviously know there’s no reason for you to try to hide or coverup anything.

But you won’t acknowledge this because it buttfricks all your bullshite narratives, doesn’t it.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73303 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 12:52 am to
quote:

speak to Putin by himself without any counsel despite the fact that he’s always having to be handled by his staff in order to try and stop him from putting his foot in his mouth.


What the frick
Posted by Grobins
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
154 posts
Posted on 5/31/19 at 1:02 am to
quote:

If you were accused of a crime, but you knew you were innocent, and the investigators knew you were innocent, how wrong would it be for the investigators to keep slandering you, and then anytime you angrily lash out and go, “frick you for this witch hunt”, they then claim everytime you did this you were trying to obstruct their investigation?


So you are alluding to intent or state of mind, the defense Barr provided in his “summary” briefing. The reality is that the SC office never leaked a thing during their investigation. Your reference is more in regards to media speculation, which was rampant. I think we are both in agreement that our media is biased and prefers to add opinion opposed to stating dry facts.

The reality, an innocent man would not concern himself with the opinion of sheep. If you read why their was “insufficient evidence” not “no evidence” of collusion as presented by Mueller, you would probably reconsider the premise of your argument. The appearance of cooperation is debunked when you read the collusion conclusion my friend.

Honestly, this is what frustrates me about Mueller, he assumes people will read. He needs to testify and should have been allowed to present his findings since Barr didn’t read the report before he “summarized” it. His findings have been completely opposed by Mueller and shown to be exaggerations on behalf of Barr. That should be an impeachable offense itself.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram