- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How do so many Americans have a fundamental misunderstanding of the 2nd amendment?
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:52 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:52 pm to BamaAtl
So.....
Im still waiting on an argument that is void of logical fallacies and pleas to emotions.
I find it odd that you can't do this simple task.
Im still waiting on an argument that is void of logical fallacies and pleas to emotions.
I find it odd that you can't do this simple task.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:52 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Like frick it isn't - a Davy Crockett is a firearm.
quote:
One is banned by US law, and the others aren't, and you're struggling to define why without violating your ignorant beliefs.
My beliefs are based on facts and logic.
quote:
I wasn't looking for a response, just to make you look like more of an idiot. Thanks for complying
If only I had the same level of delusional confidence that you have. I'll pay for you to take an IQ test if you'll agree to let me post them for the entire political board to see.
quote:
Where in the 2nd Amendment does it add those qualifiers?
Where it says the right to bear ARMS I.E. FIREARMS. It doesn't say the right to bear firearms, artillery, and other WMD's. Our founders were actually intelligent guys who were rational. I'm sorry that you need to take this to the absolute most extreme possible example to not look like a complete idiot but you're still there brother.
quote:
Tell that to the 17 people who died last week in a Florida high school.
17 vs. millions in one second. Not different situations at all lol. Idiot
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:52 pm to LSUgrad08112
quote:
For a bunch of liberal blue haired Taco Bell workers
quote:
fundamental misunderstanding
Careful kettle
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:53 pm to beerJeep
quote:Bamatool's schtick.
I find it odd that you can't do this simple task.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:53 pm to narddogg81
quote:
cite [you're welcome] me any country that has done this and displayed any positive effect of crime, violent crime, or even murder rate.
Australia.
I'm not even proposing Australia-level restrictions, but jesus if you're just going to lob it up there for me like a jackass, sure, I'll swing.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:54 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Im still waiting on an argument that is void of logical fallacies and pleas to emotions.
Fewer guns mean fewer gun deaths.
Again, that's neither emotion nor fallacy.
Or are you using "devoid of emotion and fallacies" as a meaningless term you'll just keep throwing out, because you're not really grasping the argument anymore? It's okay, we get it. You need some time to catch up every now and again.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:55 pm to BamaAtl
quote:But it is a fantasy.
Again, that's neither emotion nor fallacy.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:55 pm to Jbird
quote:
So more laws to break will make people like the cockbag that shot up the school realize he shouldn't do it?
I doubt a troubled kid in a foster home with limited access to resources is going to hit up a black-market arms dealer to purchase his arsenal. That's the point - you make it harder to get the means, you reduce the chance they can go through with it.
Dumbass.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:56 pm to Humanelement
The problem with banning a certain firearm is that it does not achieve the ends that its aimed at. The bottom line is crazy people will still kill 50 people at a concert. So there is no reason to strip away a fundamental right of the citizenry for a few crazies.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:57 pm to olddawg26
quote:
Careful kettle
And here comes the token liberal idiot of the political board to really stir things up and bring in more emotional arguments
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:58 pm to LSUgrad08112
quote:
ok, guy who plays too much Metal Gear Solid.
Haven't ever played those, but shoulder-mounted nukes exist in the real world. Why can't I own one, champ?
quote:
My beliefs are based on facts and logic.
Please let us know when those beliefs get here.
quote:
Where it says the right to bear ARMS I.E. FIREARMS. It doesn't say the right to bear firearms, artillery, and other WMD's.
My shoulder-mounted nuke falls under the category of 'arms'. Where can I get one?
quote:
17 vs. millions in one second.
I'd prefer neither situation, but you're perfectly fine with the 17. I don't know how to teach you empathy, little man.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:58 pm to BamaAtl
quote:So more laws dumbass.
I doubt a troubled kid in a foster home with limited access to resources is going to hit up a black-market arms dealer to purchase his arsenal. That's the point - you make it harder to get the means, you reduce the chance they can go through with it.
So now the only way in your fricked up world to procure a weapon is a black market dealer.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 6:59 pm to Jbird
quote:
But it is a fantasy.
Fewer guns is a fantasy solely because a rump of one political party in the US has decided that they're fine with children dying so long as they get to caress their firearms before sleep every night.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:00 pm to BamaAtl
quote:God what a fricking idiotic statement. Are you suggesting outlawing weapons will make them disappear overnight? fricking Rex level retard.
Fewer guns is a fantasy solely because a rump of one political party in the US has decided that they're fine with children dying so long as they get to caress their firearms before sleep every night.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:04 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Haven't ever played those, but shoulder-mounted nukes exist in the real world. Why can't I own one, champ?
Explain the discriminant self-defense uses for a nuclear weapon. Thanks, sport.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:04 pm to Jbird
quote:
So more laws dumbass.
That's right, moron. More laws. Saves lives.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:05 pm to BamaAtl
If x happens than y will happen
If the sea rises people will drown!
If no one smoked cigarettes no one would die from cigarettes
If cars were never invented, there would be no car accidents
If the sea rises people will drown!
If no one smoked cigarettes no one would die from cigarettes
If cars were never invented, there would be no car accidents
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:05 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Haven't ever played those, but shoulder-mounted nukes exist in the real world. Why can't I own one, champ?
Uh cuz ya have to have access to a warhead to be able to operate one, champ. Want me to slowly explain the difficulties associated with that again, champ?
quote:
Please let us know when those beliefs get here.
Already there, 90 IQ state worker libtard.
quote:
My shoulder-mounted nuke falls under the category of 'arms'. Where can I get one?
Wherever. Let me know how that worked out for you after you get thrown in jail for getting 1% through the process of acquiring the ammunition for it though.
quote:
I'd prefer neither situation, but you're perfectly fine with the 17. I don't know how to teach you empathy, little man.
Why don't you go out and lobby for causes that won't lead to innocent deaths then, little mr. empathy man? Why are you obsessed with getting rid of the first line of defense for many people who could be in harm's way while ignoring issues like texting while driving? I've literally never seen you lobby for something that doesn't hurt conservatives, little man. Being a sociopath and wishing harm on 50% of the country isn't better than someone who sees that taking away a very useful tool over one tragedy that involved .0000000523% of the population is a net negative to society. I'm sorry that I'm smarter than you and that I can see the forest through the trees, little man.
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Explain the discriminant self-defense uses for a nuclear weapon
Gotta get rid of the groundhogs somehow.
And we're talking a LOT of groundhogs. Very rabid little frickers.
You're welcome, buddy.
Popular
Back to top



2



