Started By
Message

re: How can you possibly deny that healthcare is a human right?

Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:42 pm to
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

which is that the 6th (as commonly interpreted) grants the right to another's labor. This fact undermines the big argument being used in this thread.


No it doesn't (refute the big argument)

It is a very specific case. There is no compulsion for any attorney to BE a public defender. I have no issue if a physician CHOOSES to be a "public doctor". And, this is ONLY because the Gov is about to visit a terrible burden on a citizen.

I don't believe a gov woker should be able to MAKE me drive my car out of the way / onto the shoulder of a roadway, etc....EXCEPT that a fire is raging and a firetruck must get through (ambulance / police car on a call). So, the fact that there is an EXAMPLE of a specific case does not obviate the general. JEEBUS. It really isn't a very difficult nuance to get
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

As I pointed out, it actually saves forcing others to donate labor.


tell that to rural lawyers who are forced to do shite work for shite pay

because of the 6th
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44121 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

it says "assistance of counsel"



Exactly. You have a right to the assistance of counsel. Not a right to have the state provide that assistance of counsel.

quote:

Your interpretation is perfectly defensible, but you must recognize that youre in a small minority and that ship has sailed long ago.




Irrelevant. You asked how do people rectify saying you do not have a right to another man's labor with the Sixth Amendment. I pointed out why your premise was false.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44121 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

because of the 6th


Not because of the Sixth. Because of Gideon.

Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

but you didnt address the central question, which is that the 6th (as commonly interpreted) grants the right to another's labor. This fact undermines the big argument being used in this thread.



Take the "L" already.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

There is no compulsion for any attorney to BE a public defender.


au contraire

Attorneys are frequently compelled by judges to represent defendants in rural areas or areas with inadequate PD coverage.

Because of the Bill of Rights

its also why our tax dollars are taken and appropriated for PD offices
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44121 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Because of the Bill of Rights


Because of Gideon. Not the Bill of Rights.

You saying this over and over doesn't make it true.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Exactly. You have a right to the assistance of counsel. Not a right to have the state provide that assistance of counsel.


"assist" is a verb

it is the labor of another
Posted by RPC4LSU
Thibodaux, LA
Member since Jan 2006
2041 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:48 pm to
Public defenders are paid just not paid well. Very few lawyers spend their entire careers as public defenders.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44121 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

"assist" is a verb

it is the labor of another




And where in the Sixth does it say this labor is to be provided by the State?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135260 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

It clearly guarantees a "right" to the labor of an attorney.
It does not guarantee a "right" to the labor of any attorney, nor does it guarantee a right to elective counsel, as in rendering civil suit. Likewise there is no intelligent proposition holding that nonelective healthcare is denied currently in the US.

Surely those are not the arguments you are bringing.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Attorneys are frequently


An attorney would destroy you on the stand for using such imprecise language. How "frequent"? What percentage? Is that SAME percentage okay with you as it comes to medicine / physicians?


quote:

"assist" is a verb

it is the labor of another


Ugh...okay. I'd prefer to argue with a lamp. At least, I believe it is bright.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Take the "L" already.


as soon as someone can reconcile their "no right to labor" argument with "assistance of counsel" right.

Yall have danced around it but none have done it yet.

btw I totally agree about health care lol
Posted by LSUROXS
Texas
Member since Sep 2006
8486 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:52 pm to
And yet all of those countries come to US for medical care.
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

as soon as someone can reconcile their "no right to labor" argument with "assistance of counsel" right.

Yall have danced around it but none have done it yet.


We can explain it to you. We can't understand it for you
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Surely those are not the arguments you are bringing.


correct

my only point is "assistance of counsel" is another's labor, and therefore the 6th undermines the logic of this thread
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44121 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

as soon as someone can reconcile their "no right to labor" argument with "assistance of counsel" right.


You have yet to answer my question. Where in the Sixth Amendment does it say the "assistance of counsel" was to be provided by the State?
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5361 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

And where in the Sixth does it say this labor is to be provided by the State?



beside the point

assist is still a verb
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

my only point is "assistance of counsel" is another's labor, and therefore the 6th undermines the logic of this thread



Only a child has to have absolutes. No adult is battling this "nuance" as if it is a great conundrum.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 2/5/20 at 2:54 pm to
Maintenance of health /wellness is a human right centered on the decisions /lifestyle choices of the individual. The role of government should be to foster an environment that allows the individual to thrive. Precision wellness based on the individual.

Sick care is a privilege that should only be needed when above fails. Instead this model is passed off as “healthcare”. The individual defers his rights to large institutions who “know what is best” for them. They forfeit decision making to others and hope someone can fix them once they break or are unable to maintain homeostasis (“get sick”). Population based recommendations tend to be the rule as the individual is reduced to a stat in a religion of RCTs. Individuals in this model have no “right” to demand the service/time of others. Your right is to do everything you can to not “get sick”.

This discussion gets us into the themes of victimhood, individuality, mindset, decentralized power, and autonomy

Heal yourself
Help heal others
This post was edited on 2/5/20 at 2:56 pm
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram