- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How bad of an L are “clean energy” hags and Greta apostles taking?
Posted on 2/17/21 at 7:12 pm to MrFizzle
Posted on 2/17/21 at 7:12 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
Listen I don’t expect any Texans to have a snow blower
Nope. But a former client and I were talking about one of his utility solar projects being zero prod because of snow and we were joking around about using leaf blowers to clear them off and I’ll be damned if they didn’t and it worked.
Posted on 2/17/21 at 7:14 pm to cwill
quote:
You need to throw natty gas up on that L board, too.
Stacking Ls.
Don’t forget about coal dumping a few thousand kWhs at about the worst moment.
And all I heard about that nuke reactor going down was a sensor. Not sure if it was weather related. Certainly couldn’t have been load related.
Posted on 2/17/21 at 8:29 pm to beerJeep
quote:
In truth, the issue re: electricity in America has more to do with pussies being scared of the near limitless power we could receive via nuclear power, which, as the data in Texas shows, had absolutely ZERO fluctuation due to the cold where as every other version did.
We could easily have enough electricity for everyone to run every damn appliance and light year round without issue. We could make every street be lit up in neon and flashing lights. But nuclear baddddddd
When you're right, you're right.
To go one further, if we solve the bigger nuclear problem (fusion, which I concede may not be solvable from a technical standpoint), that effectively solves the power problem, within a generation, for all humans who will ever live. And it will only get more compact, efficient and safe as we go along.
And if, within a 40 or 50 year window from now, there is virtually unlimited, virtually free electricity for almost any demand level, anywhere on the planet, forever, then whatever will we wage wars over? Religion? Beer?
:letthatsinkin:
This post was edited on 2/17/21 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 2/17/21 at 8:33 pm to MrFizzle
quote:
maybe the Texas government should’ve thought about worst case scenarios.
Sho nuff boy. Dat why we'uns should be using all dat nat gas we's got for lectriacals.
Posted on 2/17/21 at 8:48 pm to Shamoan
No worries, thanks for clarifying.
Just wanted to add Im confident the total cost of damage to personal property (burst pipes, fires, ect) will far outweigh the cost skipped in 2011 to winterize power generation.
Just wanted to add Im confident the total cost of damage to personal property (burst pipes, fires, ect) will far outweigh the cost skipped in 2011 to winterize power generation.
Posted on 2/17/21 at 8:52 pm to 56lsu
We should have sold your state to Canada a long time ago. TX will figure shite out and there will be a bunch of blustering, but please don't compare MI to anything.
Back to top


0







