- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How are Bundy's statements on negroes related to the ranch standoff with BLM?
Posted on 4/24/14 at 4:53 pm to Roger Klarvin
Posted on 4/24/14 at 4:53 pm to Roger Klarvin
I can hardly wait to hear what he says at the RNC.
1
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:01 pm to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
I can hardly wait to hear what he says at the RNC.
Maybe Clint Eastwood will moderate a Bundy-Rep.AlvinHolmes debate.
Talk about praying for some empty chairs!
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:19 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The Clarke County Controversy was ALWAYS about the BLM, Period. It was always purely, simply about the BLM threatening to geaux Waco/RubyRidge over a bunch of cows.
It was a BLM "land grab" that has morphed into the above once everyone realized Bundy hadn't a leg to stand on.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 6:17 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
BLM threatening to geaux Waco/RubyRidge over a bunch of cows.
They should just wait until the cows leave to go to the store and just pick them up then.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 6:47 pm to goldennugget
His case wasn't compelling before. People are striving, beyond credibility, to make his situation into a true property rights dispute with the federal government. It isn't.
It's a guy who makes an extralegal claim based on some made-up theory about who should control land in question. I hate government overreach, but this isn't a particularly good example.
And now, he's made all of his supporters look like backward racists.
Let's just be honest, he's an idiot. Listen to him try to articulate his views.
It's a guy who makes an extralegal claim based on some made-up theory about who should control land in question. I hate government overreach, but this isn't a particularly good example.
And now, he's made all of his supporters look like backward racists.
Let's just be honest, he's an idiot. Listen to him try to articulate his views.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:15 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
It's a guy who makes an extralegal claim based on some made-up theory about who should control land in question.
He tried to claim Pollard's Lessee V. Hagan (1845) apllied.
The only problem was that US v. Gardner had already shot that down ruling that Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan does not apply to land in Nevada.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:19 pm to cwill
quote:
It was a BLM "land grab" that has morphed into the above once everyone realized
quote:Yours was a try, not a good try, but a try.
cwill
If the pipsqueak inappropriate militant BLM fricks hadn't threatened the lives of innocent citizens, this would have never """morphed""" into anything.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:25 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
If the pipsqueak inappropriate militant BLM fricks hadn't threatened the lives of innocent citizens, this would have never """morphed""" into anything.
How did the BLM threaten them?
BLM Rangers were on Federal Land rounding up the cattle. Did they force the Bundys and their supporters to show up and oppose the execution of the court order?
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:30 pm to theenemy
quote:With M-16's?
How did the BLM threaten them?
Posted on 4/24/14 at 8:34 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
What on earth did Trayvon's school records have to do with the fact that he jumped a neighborhood watchman in the dark while looking in the windows of other people's houses?
That he wasn't a choir boy and this claim of what he did is believable?
Posted on 4/28/14 at 9:04 am to goldennugget
Actually, his pro-slavery beliefs have a lot to do with the issue of state sovereignty.
He doesn't believe in the federal government's right to exist.
Therefore, he doesn't think the federal government had the right to upend southern states power to uphold slavery. Just like the federal government doesn't have the power to regulate federally owned land.
The two issues are intertwined.
He doesn't believe in the federal government's right to exist.
Therefore, he doesn't think the federal government had the right to upend southern states power to uphold slavery. Just like the federal government doesn't have the power to regulate federally owned land.
The two issues are intertwined.
Posted on 4/28/14 at 9:06 am to samson'sseed
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News