Honest Question: When articles like this are published ...

So people can't point out the glaring inaccuracies between the data and the conclusion drawn in the article. Climate change fanatics are well known for altering data and drawing false conclusions.

If the argument against global warming is saving the West Coast, the East Coast, Florida, and Memphis, I don't think you are putting forth whats known as a "winning strategy."

That’s kind of my point. Are there any studies out there which claim to offer proof that, for instance, Florida won’t exist at some point in the future? Or are we just supposed to take National Geographic’s word for it. All that article sources to are some names of people who I suppose they think are experts on the matter. But no hard data whatsoever.