- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hillary Clinton spent $10 million dollars for Obama to approve fake Russia investigation
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 12/30/25 at 8:59 am to SlowFlowPro
I've never shied away from stating quite clearly that Obama, a Democrat, was in office when Trump was running for President. This is only germane to the conversation as far as the conspiracy against Trump goes. The Jan 5th Oval office meeting is further proof of a conspiracy of sedition. It was used as a formal means to further the lie of Russian Trump collusion to affect the 2016 election.
Again, you know this, but because you don't like the facts being uncovered, you act stupid and pretend "So what?".
Again, you know this, but because you don't like the facts being uncovered, you act stupid and pretend "So what?".
1
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:02 am to Jbird
quote:
How about the IC itself?
Following direct orders form the President to craft intel?
Where do you think that will go, especially under the Unified Executive Theory being pushed in 2025?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:04 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
This is only germane to the conversation as far as the conspiracy against Trump goes.
You are connecting unrelated dots to form that conspiracy. That's the issue.
quote:
The Jan 5th Oval office meeting is further proof of a conspiracy of sedition.
a. Was HRC part of this meeting? Was anyone from her campaign part of this meeting?
b. How can Obama engage in sedition against himself? He was President on January 5, 2017, as well.
quote:
It was used as a formal means to further the lie of Russian Trump collusion to affect the 2016 election.
A meeting on January 5, 2017 was part of a conspiracy to affect the election that happened 2 months prior? Was a time machine involved?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
That's irrelevant, and you know it. It was a Catch 22 scenario. Trump doesn't follow through, he's hiding something. He does, there's a chance the investigation will find SOMETHING. To the chagrin of all Dems, it didn't. But you'll never hear the MSM or Dems apologize.
Your game is insufferable and lame.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Now you're just in full denial and acting like a 5 yr old.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:07 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
That's irrelevant,
No it's very relevant to the GTOE, just damning for the theory.
As I have said for months, the Meuller investigation guts the GTOE. You just don't like that fact.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:08 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Now you're just in full denial
Says the guy who won't answer questions that are bad for his argument
I'll let you try again
a. Was HRC part of this meeting? Was anyone from her campaign part of this meeting?
b. How can Obama engage in sedition against himself? He was President on January 5, 2017, as well.
A meeting on January 5, 2017 was part of a conspiracy to affect the election that happened 2 months prior? Was a time machine involved?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:09 am to SouthEasternKaiju
We all know this. Hillary is above a deposition at the congressional level So why bother repeating this ad nauseam when nothing is ever going to be done about it?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:I was following orders!
Following direct orders form the President to craft intel?
quote:Hmm....something seems chronologically odd here.
Unified Executive Theory being pushed in 2025?
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:10 am to SlowFlowPro
I'll just summarize this quickly. The problem with your argument is that you're just engaging in dot-connecting. You're not relying on facts or logic to connect the various points of your argument necessary to completely defend your full point. You are just picking random points and saying "AHA!" without any logical/factual connective tissue. That is bad rhetoric.
*ETA: it's why you're having such difficulty defending your argument and have to rely on another random dot to connect instead (with the associated "AHA!")
Example:
SEK: HRC was part of a conspiracy to overthrow Trump as President
SFP: What evidence do you have of her participation while Trump was actually President?
SEK: PETER STROZK! AHA!
You've done that twice now ITT. It makes no sense
*ETA: it's why you're having such difficulty defending your argument and have to rely on another random dot to connect instead (with the associated "AHA!")
Example:
SEK: HRC was part of a conspiracy to overthrow Trump as President
SFP: What evidence do you have of her participation while Trump was actually President?
SEK: PETER STROZK! AHA!
You've done that twice now ITT. It makes no sense
This post was edited on 12/30/25 at 9:15 am
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:11 am to Jbird
quote:
Hmm....something seems chronologically odd here.
The analysis would apply to 2016
Just like how criminal immunity was only putative in 2016 but is concrete in 2025. If called to task, that putative nature would become concrete.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:So Obama would have invoked that argument?
The analysis would apply to 2016
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:17 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
quote:
The collusion occurred months before the election while Obama was President. The only President they could have overthrown was....Obama
You really are quite stupid.
Nuh uh, he's the smartest person on this board. Just ask him.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:18 am to Jbird
There's a reason he wasn't prosecuted for murder of Anwar al-Awlaki and his sone
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:18 am to moneyg
quote:
noted
Not going to let you back off that.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's a reason he wasn't prosecuted for murder of Anwar al-Awlaki and his sone
Black Jesus?Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:19 am to Jbird
quote:
SlowPagePro protecting the team.
Always.
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:20 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Now you're just in full denial and acting like a 5 yr old.
"NUH UH!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!! OMB!!!!
"
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
Braindead idiot gomer
Posted on 12/30/25 at 9:22 am to SlowFlowPro
No idea what you mean by GTOE, but I don't care.
Hillary wasn't a part of government in Jan 5, 2017, so her attendance to the Oval Office meeting would have been meaningless as well as a massive red flag. The meeting was set up to sabotage the incoming admin. using the FBI under the delusional lie of Trump + Russia collusion to fix the 2016 election.
You keep trying to toss out there red herring deflections because you internally can't face the facts.
No time travel was required. Just dirty gov bureaucracy and judges to play their part. And they did.
And I'm tired of you pretending this didn't happen.
Hillary wasn't a part of government in Jan 5, 2017, so her attendance to the Oval Office meeting would have been meaningless as well as a massive red flag. The meeting was set up to sabotage the incoming admin. using the FBI under the delusional lie of Trump + Russia collusion to fix the 2016 election.
You keep trying to toss out there red herring deflections because you internally can't face the facts.
No time travel was required. Just dirty gov bureaucracy and judges to play their part. And they did.
And I'm tired of you pretending this didn't happen.
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News