Started By
Message

re: Hey Look! Proof Democrats Doctored J6 Evidence

Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:57 pm to
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
18114 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:57 pm to


Wait a minute - they altered the evidence videos and presented it in the committee hearings?
I swear you cannot make this stuff up if you tried?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34024 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

But, it sure does seem like a prime case of propaganda


FIFY
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
139799 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

WildT and Texdiddler


TGFN’s drag children.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:09 pm to
Did they plug in machine gun fire or an explosion?

Beethoben's 9th?

Then "sound and fury".
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34024 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Did they plug in machine gun fire or an explosion? Beethoben's 9th? Then "sound and fury".


Deflection is the tool used to defend an untenable position.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39402 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

What the American people want to know is the truth, and this was nothing but a Hollywood production


It quite literally was. They hired TV producers to help with the case. What did dems think those producers were hired for? To fetch coffee?
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39402 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:17 pm to
Doctoring video evidence in a sworn congressional hearing where hundreds of Americans were accused of and jailed for insurrection is NBD

-TexRidder
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

It quite literally was. They hired TV producers to help with the case. What did dems think those producers were hired for? To fetch coffee?

Kinda reminds you of 2000 Mules, doesn't it?

At least, the Dems did fleece the public by charging full theater price for a nothing burger.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39402 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:20 pm to
yes Tex. A private sector documentary film produced by a non-profit is exactly the same as doctoring evidence admitted in a sworn congressional hearing accusing American citizens of fricking treason. Its exactly the same.

dumbass.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

yes Tex. A private sector documentary film produced by a non-profit is exactly the same as doctoring evidence admitted in a sworn congressional hearing accusing American citizens of fricking treason.

You might have a point.

Ed; to be honest I've never seen it.
This post was edited on 6/6/23 at 4:31 pm
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22844 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:28 pm to
Holy frickinhg shite. Admins pin this thread. Wayback machine mark this date. Everyone screen shot. Texpedo had a brief moment of reason and clarity as he browsed his pedo collection.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48851 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Pretending Jan 6 was a liberal concoction and labeling it all a conspiracy theory hasn’t worked. Those idiot LARP’ers causes real damage. It was a dumb idea from the very beginning. We need a candidate that can move the party away from J6 and the stolen election rhetoric. Sununu might be that guy.


Lulz yes lets just ignore the seditious conspiracy.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

smart enough not to bring a weapon

It goes back to the statement about them not wanting to break various state firearms laws. That indicated to me they had no real no unlawful intent. To my recollection, none of them ever indicated any unlawful intent other than the vague, "stop the steal" sentiment. I hope I didn't imply they were criminal in any respect.

But neither did any of them seem to be motivated by any nefarious Democratic/CIA/BLM/FBI conspiracies.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39402 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

to be honest I've never seen it.


Yet you cavalierly suggested they deceptively doctored video in their documentary in order to defend your precious party.
Posted by 2020_reVISION
Richmond,VA
Member since Dec 2020
3031 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

This all would be very interesting - except for the fact that I actually read the Election Board on this very site which laid out exactly who was going to DC and why in the days leading up to 1/6. Kind of throws a bunch of cold water on the cries of, "Muh, the Dems did it!"

It's funny that so many who post here now never saw that board. It was quite enlightening.


If you had any proclivity for enlightenment, you wouldn't be foolish enough to post that nonsense.
To think that people that you don't know, have no proof that they attended, what their motivations would be, or even know that they actually exist, posting on this site somehow throws cold water on anything is comically absurd.
How embarrassing for you.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

and white knight for a man kept a foot by a constant IV of amphetamine salts.

You're full of crap. Try again.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
22844 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:46 pm to
herp derp
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39402 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:46 pm to
We know there were federal operatives among the protestors and the protection of Epps, a known agitator, is too glaring to ignore. The so-called bombers, the refusal of additional security, police letting people in… it’s a lot to gloss over.

Whether this was the spark that ignited this? We’ll never know, but it’s certainly real.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Deflection is the tool used to defend an untenable position.

I'm asking what they plugged in instead and no one will answer.

Yes they should have labeled it, but the question of what was added to the piece is relevant based on the allegations of deception, and not a deflection, dolt.

With all the noise being made I thought someone here would know the answer.

Typical of the depth of knowledge on this board. Just bark when told to- like trained seals.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 6/6/23 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Except he was on camera when he said it. You commies will lie and deny regardless of the evidence at your feet.

So he couldn't have been carrying out administration policy because he was on camera?

Swing and a wiff.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram